Toll-managed lanes: A simplified benefit-cost analysis of seven US projects

被引:6
|
作者
Casady, Carter B. [1 ]
Gomez-Ibanez, Jose A. [2 ]
Schwimmer, Emily [3 ]
机构
[1] Stanford Univ, Civil & Environm Engn, Stanford, CA 94305 USA
[2] Harvard Univ, Urban Planning & Publ Policy, Cambridge, MA 02115 USA
[3] Harvard Univ, Urban Planning, Cambridge, MA 02115 USA
关键词
Managed lanes; Transportation; Public-private partnerships (PPPs); Tolls; Benefit-cost analysis (BCA); Value of time (VOT); VARIABLE PRICING PROJECTS; OPTIMAL ROAD CAPACITY; TRAVEL-TIME;
D O I
10.1016/j.tranpol.2020.02.001
中图分类号
F [经济];
学科分类号
02 ;
摘要
Toll managed lanes are expressway lanes where tolls are used-often in combination with preferred access for high occupancy vehicles and other special traffic management techniques-to improve the highway's capacity, speed or reliability. Such lanes have become popular with transportation policymakers as a way of maintaining free-flowing traffic on certain sections of the highway while also, in some cases, financing the construction of new lanes in congested urban areas. This study examines whether toll-managed lanes are as beneficial as they are popular. The heart of the analysis is the application of a simplified social benefit-cost analysis (BCA) to seven projects. In brief, our results paint a complicated picture of toll-managed lane efficacy. Only two of the seven projects have benefit-cost (B/C) ratios above 1.0 using our base case assumptions about the value of travel time saved and the discount rate, although three others approach or exceed 1.0 with more optimistic but plausible assumptions. The most successful generate not only a significant savings of around 4-5 min per trip for motorists who switch to the managed lane but also smaller per-trip savings for the large majority of motorists who continue to use the general-purpose lanes. It is important to acknowledge, however, that these calculations depend upon some uncertain assumptions about the value of travel time savings and improved reliability.
引用
收藏
页码:38 / 53
页数:16
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [1] Benefit-cost analysis of variable pricing projects: QuickRide HOT lanes
    Burris, M
    Sullivan, E
    [J]. JOURNAL OF TRANSPORTATION ENGINEERING, 2006, 132 (03) : 183 - 190
  • [2] Benefit-cost analysis of variable pricing projects: SR-91 express lanes
    Sullivan, E
    Burris, M
    [J]. JOURNAL OF TRANSPORTATION ENGINEERING-ASCE, 2006, 132 (03): : 191 - 198
  • [3] Benefit-Cost Analysis of Rail Projects: A Commentary
    Schweitzer, Lisa
    [J]. PUBLIC WORKS MANAGEMENT & POLICY, 2011, 16 (02) : 129 - 131
  • [4] BENEFIT-COST ANALYSIS OF IRRIGATION PROJECTS IN AUSTRALIA
    DAVIDSON, B
    [J]. JOURNAL OF THE AUSTRALIAN INSTITUTE OF AGRICULTURAL SCIENCE, 1969, 35 (04): : 254 - &
  • [5] US benefit-cost analysis requires revision
    Howard, Peter H.
    Sarinsky, Max
    Bauer, Michael
    Cecot, Caroline
    Cropper, Maureen
    Drupp, Moritz
    Freeman, Mark
    Gillingham, Kenneth T.
    Gollier, Christian
    Groom, Ben
    Li, Qingran
    Livermore, Michael
    Newell, Richard
    Pizer, William A.
    Prest, Brian
    Rudebusch, Glenn
    Sterner, Thomas
    Wagne, Gernot
    [J]. SCIENCE, 2023, 380 (6647)
  • [6] Issues in benefit-cost analysis of agricultural research projects
    Marshall, GR
    Brennan, JP
    [J]. AUSTRALIAN JOURNAL OF AGRICULTURAL AND RESOURCE ECONOMICS, 2001, 45 (02) : 195 - 213
  • [7] Toll-managed lane pioneers: Lessons from five US states
    Swimmer, Emily
    Gomez-Ibanez, Jose A.
    Casady, Carter
    [J]. CASE STUDIES ON TRANSPORT POLICY, 2019, 7 (03) : 655 - 666
  • [8] A Benefit-Cost Analysis of US Agricultural Trade Promotion
    Kinnucan, Henry W.
    Cai, Hailong
    [J]. AMERICAN JOURNAL OF AGRICULTURAL ECONOMICS, 2011, 93 (01) : 194 - 208
  • [9] RANKING COMPETING NOISE PROJECTS USING BENEFIT-COST ANALYSIS
    WARD, TL
    [J]. JOURNAL OF THE ACOUSTICAL SOCIETY OF AMERICA, 1975, 57 : S4 - S5
  • [10] Benefit-cost analysis
    Kingston, G
    [J]. ECONOMIC RECORD, 2004, 80 (251) : 468 - 469