Benefit-cost analysis of variable pricing projects: QuickRide HOT lanes

被引:16
|
作者
Burris, M
Sullivan, E
机构
[1] Texas A&M Univ, Dept Civil Engn, College Stn, TX 77843 USA
[2] Calif Polytech State Univ San Luis Obispo, Dept Civil & Environm Engn, San Luis Obispo, CA 93407 USA
关键词
D O I
10.1061/(ASCE)0733-947X(2006)132:3(183)
中图分类号
TU [建筑科学];
学科分类号
0813 ;
摘要
Researchers identified a potential methodology for obtaining the incremental societal costs and benefits from a variable pricing project and applied that methodology to the QuickRide high occupancy/toll (HOT) lanes in Texas. This is one of the longest running variable pricing projects in the United States and, as such, it provided useful historical data and trends upon which to estimate future benefits and costs. This analysis found that the incremental societal benefits of QuickRide exceeded incremental societal costs for the time period considered. A companion paper that used the same methodology to examine the benefits and costs of the SR-91 Express Lanes found similar results. However, the differences between the benefits and costs were dramatically different for the two projects, indicative of the relative size of the two projects and the number of travelers impacted. On SR-91, tens of thousands of travelers were impacted on a daily basis where QuickRide's impact was limited to approximately 400 travelers per day. Interestingly, the benefit-cost ratios of the two projects were similar, both between 1.5 and 1.7.
引用
收藏
页码:183 / 190
页数:8
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [1] Benefit-cost analysis of variable pricing projects: SR-91 express lanes
    Sullivan, E
    Burris, M
    [J]. JOURNAL OF TRANSPORTATION ENGINEERING-ASCE, 2006, 132 (03): : 191 - 198
  • [2] Toll-managed lanes: A simplified benefit-cost analysis of seven US projects
    Casady, Carter B.
    Gomez-Ibanez, Jose A.
    Schwimmer, Emily
    [J]. TRANSPORT POLICY, 2020, 89 : 38 - 53
  • [3] Benefit-Cost Analysis of Rail Projects: A Commentary
    Schweitzer, Lisa
    [J]. PUBLIC WORKS MANAGEMENT & POLICY, 2011, 16 (02) : 129 - 131
  • [4] BENEFIT-COST ANALYSIS OF IRRIGATION PROJECTS IN AUSTRALIA
    DAVIDSON, B
    [J]. JOURNAL OF THE AUSTRALIAN INSTITUTE OF AGRICULTURAL SCIENCE, 1969, 35 (04): : 254 - &
  • [5] PUBLIC ENTERPRISE PRICING AND SOCIAL BENEFIT-COST ANALYSIS
    ACHARYA, SN
    [J]. OXFORD ECONOMIC PAPERS-NEW SERIES, 1972, 24 (03): : 36 - 53
  • [6] Issues in benefit-cost analysis of agricultural research projects
    Marshall, GR
    Brennan, JP
    [J]. AUSTRALIAN JOURNAL OF AGRICULTURAL AND RESOURCE ECONOMICS, 2001, 45 (02) : 195 - 213
  • [7] RANKING COMPETING NOISE PROJECTS USING BENEFIT-COST ANALYSIS
    WARD, TL
    [J]. JOURNAL OF THE ACOUSTICAL SOCIETY OF AMERICA, 1975, 57 : S4 - S5
  • [8] Benefit-cost analysis
    Kingston, G
    [J]. ECONOMIC RECORD, 2004, 80 (251) : 468 - 469
  • [9] Benefit-cost analysis
    Dorman, P
    [J]. JOURNAL OF ECONOMIC PERSPECTIVES, 1997, 11 (02): : 188 - 190
  • [10] Benefit-cost analysis of non-marginal climate and energy projects
    Dietz, Simon
    Hepburn, Cameron
    [J]. ENERGY ECONOMICS, 2013, 40 : 61 - 71