MONITORING THE URBAN TREE COVER FOR URBAN ECOSYSTEM SERVICES - THE CASE OF LEIPZIG, GERMANY

被引:10
|
作者
Banzhaf, E. [1 ]
Kollai, H. [1 ]
机构
[1] UFZ Helmholtz, Environm Res Ctr, Dept Urban & Environm Sociol, Working Grp Geomat, Permoserstr 15, D-04318 Leipzig, Germany
关键词
Mapping Urban Tree Cover; Urban Ecosystem Functions; Urban Ecosystem Services (urban ESS); Digital Ortho Photos (DOP); Digital Surface Model (DSM); Object-based Image Analysis (OBIA); Inner Urban Differentiation;
D O I
10.5194/isprsarchives-XL-7-W3-301-2015
中图分类号
X [环境科学、安全科学];
学科分类号
08 ; 0830 ;
摘要
Urban dynamics such as (extreme) growth and shrinkage bring about fundamental challenges for urban land use and related changes. In order to achieve a sustainable urban development, it is crucial to monitor urban green infrastructure at microscale level as it provides various urban ecosystem services in neighbourhoods, supporting quality of life and environmental health. We monitor urban trees by means of a multiple data set to get a detailed knowledge on its distribution and change over a decade for the entire city. We have digital orthophotos, a digital elevation model and a digital surface model. The refined knowledge on the absolute height above ground helps to differentiate tree tops. Grounded on an object-based image analysis scheme a detailed mapping of trees in an urbanized environment is processed. Results show high accuracy of tree detection and avoidance of misclassification due to shadows. The study area is the City of Leipzig, Germany. One of the leading German cities, it is home to contiguous community allotments that characterize the configuration of the city. Leipzig has one of the most well-preserved floodplain forests in Europe.
引用
下载
收藏
页码:301 / 305
页数:5
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [21] Enabling ecosystem services at the neighborhood scale while allowing for urban regrowth: the case of Halle, Germany
    Haase, Dagmar
    Wolff, Manuel
    ECOLOGY AND SOCIETY, 2022, 27 (01):
  • [22] The urban political ecology of ecosystem services: The case of Barcelona
    Depietri, Yaella
    Kallis, Giorgos
    Baro, Francesc
    Cattaneo, Claudio
    ECOLOGICAL ECONOMICS, 2016, 125 : 83 - 100
  • [23] Urban ecosystem services: tree diversity and stability of tropospheric ozone removal
    Manes, Fausto
    Incerti, Guido
    Salvatori, Elisabetta
    Vitale, Marcello
    Ricotta, Carlo
    Costanza, Robert
    ECOLOGICAL APPLICATIONS, 2012, 22 (01) : 349 - 360
  • [24] Urban tree measurement variability and the contribution to uncertainty in estimates of ecosystem services
    Westfall, James A.
    Henning, Jason G.
    Edgar, Christopher B.
    URBAN FORESTRY & URBAN GREENING, 2021, 64
  • [25] Community perceptions of ecosystem services and disservices linked to urban tree plantings
    Drew-Smythe, Jessi J.
    Davila, Yvonne C.
    McLean, Christopher M.
    Hingee, Matthew C.
    Murray, Megan L.
    Webb, Jonathan K.
    Krix, Daniel W.
    Murray, Brad R.
    URBAN FORESTRY & URBAN GREENING, 2023, 82
  • [26] Tree cover is crucial but riparian areas provide a strategic focus for preserving an urban avoider in a fragmented urban ecosystem
    Connelly, Christine A.
    Lennox, Erin
    Isaac, Bronwyn
    Aulich, Vincent
    Cooke, Raylene
    Weston, Michael A.
    White, John G.
    EMU-AUSTRAL ORNITHOLOGY, 2020, 120 (04): : 304 - 312
  • [27] Ecosystem services in urban areas
    Bolund, P
    Hunhammar, S
    ECOLOGICAL ECONOMICS, 1999, 29 (02) : 293 - 301
  • [28] GEODESIGN FOR URBAN ECOSYSTEM SERVICES
    La Rosa, Daniele
    TEMA-JOURNAL OF LAND USE MOBILITY AND ENVIRONMENT, 2014, : 557 - 565
  • [29] The impact of land use/land cover scale on modelling urban ecosystem services
    Darren R. Grafius
    Ron Corstanje
    Philip H. Warren
    Karl L. Evans
    Steven Hancock
    Jim A. Harris
    Landscape Ecology, 2016, 31 : 1509 - 1522
  • [30] The impact of land use/land cover scale on modelling urban ecosystem services
    Grafius, Darren R.
    Corstanje, Ron
    Warren, Philip H.
    Evans, Karl L.
    Hancock, Steven
    Harris, Jim A.
    LANDSCAPE ECOLOGY, 2016, 31 (07) : 1509 - 1522