Utilization of a Linear Solver for Multiscale Design and Optimization of Microstructures

被引:30
|
作者
Acar, Pinar [1 ]
Sundararaghavan, Veera [1 ]
机构
[1] Univ Michigan, Dept Aerosp Engn, Ann Arbor, MI 48109 USA
基金
美国国家科学基金会;
关键词
SENSITIVE DESIGN;
D O I
10.2514/1.J054822
中图分类号
V [航空、航天];
学科分类号
08 ; 0825 ;
摘要
Microstructures have a significant effect on the performance of critical components in numerous aerospace metallic material applications. Examples include panels in airframes that are exposed to high temperatures and sensors used for vibration tuning. This paper addresses the techniques to optimize the microstructure design for polycrystalline metals. The microstructure is quantified with the orientation distribution function that determines the volume densities of crystals that make up the polycrystal microstructure. The orientation distribution function of polycrystalline alloys (e.g., hexagonal close-packed titanium) is represented in a discrete form, and the volume-averaged properties are computed through the orientation distribution function. The optimization is performed using the space of all possible volume-averaged macroproperties (stiffness and thermal expansion). A direct linear solver is employed to find the optimal orientation distribution functions. The direct solver is capable of finding exact solutions even for problems with multiple or infinite solutions. It is first applied to the optimization of the panel-buckling problem. The objective of the buckling optimization problem is to find the best microstructure design that maximizes the critical buckling temperature. The optimum solution computed with this approach is found to be same as the optimum solution of a global approach that uses a genetic algorithm. The linear solver methodology is extended to plastic properties and applied to explore the design of a Galfenol beam microstructure for vibration tuning with a yielding objective. The design approach is shown to lead to multiple optimum solutions.
引用
收藏
页码:1751 / 1759
页数:9
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [31] Bayesian Optimization for Design of Multiscale Biological Circuits
    Merzbacher, Charlotte
    Mac Aodha, Oisin
    Oyarzun, Diego A.
    ACS SYNTHETIC BIOLOGY, 2023, 12 (07): : 2073 - 2082
  • [32] Multiscale optimization in VLSI physical design automation
    Chan, TF
    Cong, J
    Shinnerl, JR
    Sze, K
    Xie, M
    Zhang, Y
    MULTISCALE OPTIMIZATION METHODS AND APPLICATIONS, 2006, 82 : 1 - +
  • [33] Parallel linear solver under PVM for electric machine design
    Kim, HJ
    Kim, HS
    Choi, K
    Lee, HB
    Jung, HK
    Hahn, SY
    NONLINEAR ELECTROMAGNETIC SYSTEMS, 1996, 10 : 128 - 131
  • [34] Design, visualization, and utilization of enzyme microstructures built on solid surfaces
    Gáspár, S
    Schuhmann, W
    Laurell, T
    Csöregi, E
    REVIEWS IN ANALYTICAL CHEMISTRY, 2002, 21 (04): : 245 - 266
  • [35] A MULTISCALE METHOD FOR POROUS MICROSTRUCTURES
    Brown, Donald L.
    Peterseim, Daniel
    MULTISCALE MODELING & SIMULATION, 2016, 14 (03): : 1123 - 1152
  • [36] Dynamic Optimization of Linear Solver Parameters in Mathematical Modelling of Unsteady Processes
    Bagaev, Dmitry
    Konshin, Igor
    Nikitin, Kirill
    SUPERCOMPUTING, RUSCDAYS 2017, 2017, 793 : 54 - 66
  • [37] A Novel Connectivity Index for Microstructures Imperfection Detection and Rectification in a Multiscale Structure Design
    Rastegarzadeh, Sina
    Huang, Jida
    Journal of Mechanical Design, 2025, 147 (05)
  • [38] Design and optimization of a SiC thermal emitter/absorber composed of periodic microstructures based on a non-linear method
    王卫杰
    赵振国
    赵艺
    周海京
    符策基
    Chinese Physics B, 2015, 24 (09) : 280 - 287
  • [39] Design and optimization of a SiC thermal emitter/absorber composed of periodic microstructures based on a non-linear method
    Wang Wei-Jie
    Zhao Zhen-Guo
    Zhao Yi
    Zhou Hai-Jing
    Fu Ce-Ji
    CHINESE PHYSICS B, 2015, 24 (09)
  • [40] Topological optimization for the design of microstructures of isotropic cellular materials
    Radman, A.
    Huang, X.
    Xie, Y. M.
    ENGINEERING OPTIMIZATION, 2013, 45 (11) : 1331 - 1348