Nerve-sparing in salvage robot-assisted prostatectomy: surgical technique, oncological and functional outcomes at a single high-volume institution

被引:17
|
作者
Bonet, Xavier [1 ,2 ]
Ogaya-Pinies, Gabriel [2 ]
Woodlief, Tracey [2 ]
Hernandez-Cardona, Eduardo [2 ]
Ganapathi, Hariharan [2 ]
Rogers, Travis [2 ]
Coelho, Rafael F. [2 ,4 ]
Rocco, Bernardo [2 ,3 ]
Vigues, Francesc
Patel, Vipul [2 ]
机构
[1] Hosp Univ Bellvitge, Barcelona, Spain
[2] Florida Hosp, Global Robot Inst, Celebration, FL USA
[3] Fdn IRCCS Ca Grande Osped Maggiore Policlin, Milan, Italy
[4] Univ Sao Paulo, Sch Med, Sao Paulo, Brazil
关键词
salvage robot-assisted prostatectomy; nerve-sparing; neurovascular bundle; surgical technique; erectile function; continence; RADICAL PROSTATECTOMY; RADIATION-THERAPY; CANCER; FAILURE;
D O I
10.1111/bju.14517
中图分类号
R5 [内科学]; R69 [泌尿科学(泌尿生殖系疾病)];
学科分类号
1002 ; 100201 ;
摘要
ObjectivePatients and MethodsTo show the feasibility, oncological and functional outcomes of neurovascular bundle (NVB) preservation during salvage robot-assisted radical prostatectomy (RARP). In the present institutional review board-approved retrospective analysis, between January 2008 and March 2016, 80 patients underwent salvage RARP, performed by a single surgeon (V.P), because of local recurrence after primary treatment. These patients were categorized into two groups depending on the degree of nerve-sparing (NS) performed: a good-NS group (50% of NVB preservation) and a poor-NS group (<50% of NVB preservation). A standard transperitoneal six-port technique, using the DaVinci Surgical System (Intuitive Surgical, Sunnyvale, CA, USA), was performed, and either an anterograde or a retrograde approach was used for NVB preservation. Validated questionnaires were used preoperatively (Sexual Health Inventory for Men [SHIM] and American Urological Association scores). Potency after salvage RARP was defined as the ability to achieve a successful erection with penetration >50% of the time, while full continence after salvage RARPwas defined as 0 pads used. The Kaplan-Meier method was used for survival and predictive estimations, and regression models were used to identify the predictors of potency, continence and biochemical failure (BCF). ResultsConclusionsThe potency rate at 12months was higher in the good-NS group (25.6% vs 4.3%; P = 0.036) regardless of previous SHIM score, and good NS tended to be predictive of potency after salvage RARP (P = 0.065). The full continence rate at 12months and BCF rate were similar in the two groups, and non-radiation primary treatment was the only predictor of continence at 12months after salvage RARP (P = 0.033). Our data support the feasibility and safety of NVB preservation for salvage RARP conducted in select patients in a high-volume institution and the subsequent better recovery of adequate erections for intercourse.
引用
收藏
页码:837 / 844
页数:8
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [21] Retrograde versus Antegrade Nerve-Sparing During Robot-Assisted Radical Prostatectomy: Which Is Better for Early Functional Outcomes?
    Ko, Y.
    Coelho, R.
    Orvieto, M.
    Sivaraman, A.
    Schatloff, O.
    Chauhan, S.
    Carrion, R.
    Palmer, K.
    Cheon, J.
    Patel, V
    UROLOGY, 2012, 80 (03) : S159 - S159
  • [22] Complications and outcomes of salvage robot-assisted radical prostatectomy: a single-institution experience
    Yuh, Bertram
    Ruel, Nora
    Muldrew, Shantel
    Mejia, Rosa
    Novara, Giacomo
    Kawachi, Mark
    Wilson, Timothy
    BJU INTERNATIONAL, 2014, 113 (05) : 769 - 776
  • [23] Extraperitoneal robot-assisted radical prostatectomy: a high-volume surgical center experience
    Scarcia, Marcello
    Zazzara, Michele
    Divenuto, Lucia
    Cardo, Giuseppe
    Portoghese, Filippo
    Romano, Michele
    Ludovico, Giuseppe M.
    MINERVA UROLOGICA E NEFROLOGICA, 2018, 70 (05) : 479 - 485
  • [24] Does The Learning Curve Affect the Surgical, Functional, and Oncologic Outcomes in Bilateral Nerve-Sparing Robot Assisted Laparoscopic Prostatectomy?
    Ucar, Murat
    Varol, Alkim T.
    Gulkesen, Kemal H.
    Caylan, Ahmet E.
    Kutlu, Omer
    Guntekin, Erol
    CUREUS JOURNAL OF MEDICAL SCIENCE, 2019, 11 (07)
  • [25] Randomized Comparison between Laparoscopic and Robot-Assisted Nerve-Sparing Radical Prostatectomy
    Asimakopoulos, Anastasios D.
    Fraga, Clovis T. Pereira
    Annino, Filippo
    Pasqualetti, Patrizio
    Calado, Adriano A.
    Mugnier, Camille
    JOURNAL OF SEXUAL MEDICINE, 2011, 8 (05): : 1503 - 1512
  • [26] Surgery Illustrated - Surgical Atlas Robot-assisted ascending-descending laparoscopic nerve-sparing prostatectomy
    Gillitzer, Rolf
    Thueroff, Joachim W.
    Neisius, Andreas
    Woellner, Jens
    Hampel, Christian
    BJU INTERNATIONAL, 2009, 104 (01) : 128 - 153
  • [27] Feasibility of robot-assisted radical prostatectomy in men at senior age ≥75 years: perioperative, functional, and oncological outcomes of a high-volume center
    Leyh-Bannurah, Sami-Ramzi
    Wagner, Christian
    Schuette, Andreas
    Liakos, Nikolaos
    Karagiotis, Theodoros
    Mendrek, Mikolaj
    Rachubinski, Pawel
    Oelke, Matthias
    Tian, Zhe
    Witt, Jorn H.
    AGING MALE, 2022, 25 (01): : 8 - 16
  • [28] FASCIA-SPARING INTRAFASCIAL NERVE-SPARING ROBOT-ASSISTED RADICAL PROSTATECTOMY AND ANATOMIC VESICOURETHRAL ANASTOMOSIS: POINT OF TECHNIQUE
    Tasci, Ali Ihsan
    Simsek, Abdulmuttalip
    Torer, Bugra Dogukan
    Sokmen, Dogukon
    Sahin, Selcuk
    Tugcu, Volkan
    ARCHIVOS ESPANOLES DE UROLOGIA, 2014, 67 (09): : 731 - 739
  • [29] Robot-assisted radical prostatectomy in elderly patients. Surgical, oncological and functional outcomes
    Porres, D.
    Pfister, D.
    Labanaris, A. P.
    Zugor, V.
    Witt, J. H.
    Heidenreich, A.
    UROLOGE, 2012, 51 (10): : 1424 - +
  • [30] Robot-assisted simple prostatectomy for treatment of large prostatic adenomas: surgical technique and outcomes from a high-volume robotic centre
    Antonio Cardi
    Giovanni Palleschi
    Giulio Patruno
    Giovanni Tuffu
    Francesco Emilio D’Amico
    Antonio De Vico
    Marco Carilli
    Patrizio Pacini
    Simone Pletto
    Gianluca D’Elia
    World Journal of Urology, 2023, 41 : 515 - 520