Nerve-sparing in salvage robot-assisted prostatectomy: surgical technique, oncological and functional outcomes at a single high-volume institution

被引:17
|
作者
Bonet, Xavier [1 ,2 ]
Ogaya-Pinies, Gabriel [2 ]
Woodlief, Tracey [2 ]
Hernandez-Cardona, Eduardo [2 ]
Ganapathi, Hariharan [2 ]
Rogers, Travis [2 ]
Coelho, Rafael F. [2 ,4 ]
Rocco, Bernardo [2 ,3 ]
Vigues, Francesc
Patel, Vipul [2 ]
机构
[1] Hosp Univ Bellvitge, Barcelona, Spain
[2] Florida Hosp, Global Robot Inst, Celebration, FL USA
[3] Fdn IRCCS Ca Grande Osped Maggiore Policlin, Milan, Italy
[4] Univ Sao Paulo, Sch Med, Sao Paulo, Brazil
关键词
salvage robot-assisted prostatectomy; nerve-sparing; neurovascular bundle; surgical technique; erectile function; continence; RADICAL PROSTATECTOMY; RADIATION-THERAPY; CANCER; FAILURE;
D O I
10.1111/bju.14517
中图分类号
R5 [内科学]; R69 [泌尿科学(泌尿生殖系疾病)];
学科分类号
1002 ; 100201 ;
摘要
ObjectivePatients and MethodsTo show the feasibility, oncological and functional outcomes of neurovascular bundle (NVB) preservation during salvage robot-assisted radical prostatectomy (RARP). In the present institutional review board-approved retrospective analysis, between January 2008 and March 2016, 80 patients underwent salvage RARP, performed by a single surgeon (V.P), because of local recurrence after primary treatment. These patients were categorized into two groups depending on the degree of nerve-sparing (NS) performed: a good-NS group (50% of NVB preservation) and a poor-NS group (<50% of NVB preservation). A standard transperitoneal six-port technique, using the DaVinci Surgical System (Intuitive Surgical, Sunnyvale, CA, USA), was performed, and either an anterograde or a retrograde approach was used for NVB preservation. Validated questionnaires were used preoperatively (Sexual Health Inventory for Men [SHIM] and American Urological Association scores). Potency after salvage RARP was defined as the ability to achieve a successful erection with penetration >50% of the time, while full continence after salvage RARPwas defined as 0 pads used. The Kaplan-Meier method was used for survival and predictive estimations, and regression models were used to identify the predictors of potency, continence and biochemical failure (BCF). ResultsConclusionsThe potency rate at 12months was higher in the good-NS group (25.6% vs 4.3%; P = 0.036) regardless of previous SHIM score, and good NS tended to be predictive of potency after salvage RARP (P = 0.065). The full continence rate at 12months and BCF rate were similar in the two groups, and non-radiation primary treatment was the only predictor of continence at 12months after salvage RARP (P = 0.033). Our data support the feasibility and safety of NVB preservation for salvage RARP conducted in select patients in a high-volume institution and the subsequent better recovery of adequate erections for intercourse.
引用
收藏
页码:837 / 844
页数:8
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [1] Robot-assisted Sacrocolpopexy for Pelvic Organ Prolapse: Surgical Technique and Outcomes at a Single High-volume Institution
    Ploumidis, Achilles
    Spinoit, Anne-Francoise
    De Naeyer, Geert
    Schatteman, Peter
    Gan, Melanie
    Ficarra, Vincenzo
    Volpe, Alessandro
    Mottrie, Alexandre
    EUROPEAN UROLOGY, 2014, 65 (01) : 138 - 145
  • [2] NERVE-SPARING ROBOT-ASSISTED RADICAL PROSTATECTOMY: THE AALST-TECHNIQUE
    Borghese, M.
    Ficarra, V.
    Schatteman, P.
    Mottrie, A.
    JOURNAL OF ENDOUROLOGY, 2012, 26 : A521 - A522
  • [3] Robot-assisted radical prostatectomy: surgical, oncological, and functional outcomes
    Boylu, Ugur
    Basatac, Cem
    Turan, Turgay
    Onol, Fikret Fatih
    Gumus, Eyup
    TURKISH JOURNAL OF UROLOGY, 2012, 38 (01): : 8 - 13
  • [4] Nerve-sparing technique and urinary control after robot-assisted laparoscopic prostatectomy
    Choi, Wesley W.
    Freire, Marcos P.
    Soukup, Jane R.
    Yin, Lei
    Lipsitz, Stuart R.
    Carvas, Fernando
    Williams, Stephen B.
    Hu, Jim C.
    WORLD JOURNAL OF UROLOGY, 2011, 29 (01) : 21 - 27
  • [5] Nerve-sparing technique and urinary control after robot-assisted laparoscopic prostatectomy
    Wesley W. Choi
    Marcos P. Freire
    Jane R. Soukup
    Lei Yin
    Stuart R. Lipsitz
    Fernando Carvas
    Stephen B. Williams
    Jim C. Hu
    World Journal of Urology, 2011, 29 : 21 - 27
  • [6] Intrafascial Nerve-Sparing Radical Prostatectomy with a Laparoscopic Robot-Assisted Extraperitoneal Approach: Early Oncological and Functional Results
    Xylinas, Evanguelos
    Ploussard, Guillaume
    Salomon, Laurent
    Paul, Alexandre
    Gillion, Norman
    De Laet, Kevin
    Vordos, Dimitri
    Hoznek, Andras
    Abbou, Clement-Claude
    de la Taille, Alexandre
    JOURNAL OF ENDOUROLOGY, 2010, 24 (04) : 577 - 582
  • [7] Techniques of Nerve-Sparing and Potency Outcomes Following Robot-Assisted Laparoscopic Prostatectomy
    Chauhan, Sanket
    Coelho, Rafael F.
    Rocco, Bernardo
    Palmer, Kenneth J.
    Orvieto, Marcelo A.
    Patel, Vipul R.
    INTERNATIONAL BRAZ J UROL, 2010, 36 (03): : 259 - 271
  • [8] Nerve-sparing robot-assisted radical prostatectomy with the HUGO™ robot-assisted surgery system using the 'Aalst technique'
    Paciotti, Marco
    Bravi, Carlo A.
    Mottaran, Angelo
    Nocera, Luigi
    Sarchi, Luca
    Piro, Adele
    Farinha, Rui
    Peraire Lores, Maria
    Balestrazzi, Eleonora
    Piramide, Federico
    Roussel, Eduard
    De Backer, Pieter
    D'Hondt, Frederiek
    De Naeyer, Geert
    De Groote, Ruben
    Mottrie, Alexandre
    BJU INTERNATIONAL, 2023, 132 (02) : 227 - 230
  • [9] Nerve-sparing robot-assisted radical prostatectomy: Current perspectives
    Kumar, Anup
    Patel, Vipul R.
    Panaiyadiyan, Sridhar
    Bhat, Kulthe Ramesh Seetharam
    Moschovas, Marcio Covas
    Nayak, Brusabhanu
    ASIAN JOURNAL OF UROLOGY, 2021, 8 (01) : 2 - 13
  • [10] Nerve-sparing robot-assisted radical prostatectomy: Current perspectives
    Anup Kumar
    Vipul RPatel
    Sridhar Panaiyadiyan
    Kulthe Ramesh Seetharam Bhat
    Marcio Covas Moschovas
    Brusabhanu Nayak
    Asian Journal of Urology, 2021, (01) : 2 - 13