Endoscopic Full Thickness Resection: A Systematic Review

被引:1
|
作者
Pal, Partha [1 ]
Ramchandani, Mohan [1 ]
Inavolu, Pradev [1 ]
Reddy, Duvvuru Nageshwar [1 ]
Tandan, Manu [1 ]
机构
[1] Asian Inst Gastroenterol, Dept Intervent Endoscopy, Hyderabad, Telangana, India
关键词
endoscopic full thickness resection; full thickness resection device; sub-epithelial lesions; over the scope dips; THE-SCOPE CLIP; GASTRIC SUBEPITHELIAL TUMORS; GASTROINTESTINAL STROMAL TUMOR; PUNCTURE-SUTURE DEVICE; MUSCULARIS PROPRIA; DEFECT CLOSURE; INCOMPLETE RESECTION; SUBMUCOSAL TUMORS; NEUROENDOCRINE TUMOR; APPENDICEAL ORIFICE;
D O I
10.1055/s-0042-1755304
中图分类号
R57 [消化系及腹部疾病];
学科分类号
摘要
Background Endoscopic full thickness resection (EFTR) is an emerging therapeutic option for resecting subepithelial lesions (SELs) and epithelial neoplasms. We aimed to systematically review the techniques, applications, outcomes, and complications of EFIR. Methods A systematic literature search was performed using PubMed. All relevant original research articles involving EFTR were included for the review along with case report/series describing novel/rare techniques from 2001 to February 2022. Results After screening 7,739 citations, finally 141 references were included. Non-exposed EFTR has lower probability of peritoneal contamination or tumor seeding compared with exposed EFTR. Among exposed EFTR, tunneled variety is associated with lower risk of peritoneal seeding or contamination compared with non-tunneled approach. Closure techniques involve though the scope (ITS) dips, loop and dips, over the scope dips (OTSC), full thickness resection device (FTRD), and endoscopic suturing/plicating/stapling devices. The indications of EFTR range from esophagus to rectum and include SELs arising from muscularis propria (MP), non-lifting adenoma, recurrent adenoma, and even early gastric cancer (EGC) or superficial colorectal carcinoma. Other indications include difficult locations (involving appendicular orifice or diverticulum) and full thickness biopsy for motility disorders. The main limitation of FTRD is feasibility in smaller lesions (<20-25 mm), which can be circumvented by hybrid EFTR techniques. Oncologic resection with lymphadencetomy for superficial GI malignancy can be accomplished by hybrid natural orifice transluminal endoscopic surgery (NOTES) combining EFTR and NOTES. Bleeding, perforation, appendicitis, enterocolonic fistula, FTRD malfunction, peritoneal tumor seeding, and contamination are among various adverse events. Post OTSC artifacts need to be differentiated from recurrent/residual lesions to avoid re-FTRD/surgery. Conclusion EFTR is safe and effective therapeutic option for SELs, recurrent and non-lifting adenomas, tumors in difficult locations and selected cases of superficial GI carcinoma.
引用
收藏
页码:152 / 169
页数:18
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [21] Current status of endoscopic full-thickness resection with the full-thickness resection device
    Mueller, Julius
    Kuellmer, Armin
    Schiemer, Moritz
    Thimme, Robert
    Schmidt, Arthur
    DIGESTIVE ENDOSCOPY, 2023, 35 (02) : 232 - 242
  • [22] Endoscopic full thickness resection versus submucosal tunneling endoscopic resection for removal of submucosal tumors: a review article
    Dellatore, Peter
    Bhagat, Vicky
    Kahaleh, Michel
    TRANSLATIONAL GASTROENTEROLOGY AND HEPATOLOGY, 2019, 4
  • [23] Endoscopic full-thickness resection for upper gastrointestinal tract lesions: a systematic review and meta-analysis
    Mohamed Abdallah
    Gaurav Suryawanshi
    Nicholas McDonald
    Saurabh Chandan
    Shifa Umar
    Nabeel Azeem
    Mohammad Bilal
    Surgical Endoscopy, 2023, 37 : 3293 - 3305
  • [24] Device-assisted endoscopic full-thickness resection in colorectum: Systematic review and meta-analysis
    Nabi, Zaheer
    Samanta, Jayanta
    Dhar, Jahnvi
    Mohan, Babu P.
    Facciorusso, Antonio
    Reddy, D. Nageshwar
    DIGESTIVE ENDOSCOPY, 2024, 36 (02) : 116 - 128
  • [25] Efficacy and safety of gastric exposed endoscopic full-thickness resection without laparoscopic assistance: a systematic review
    Granata, Antonino
    Martino, Alberto
    Amata, Michele
    Ligresti, Dario
    Tuzzolino, Fabio
    Traina, Mario
    ENDOSCOPY INTERNATIONAL OPEN, 2020, 08 (09) : E1173 - E1182
  • [26] Endoscopic full-thickness resection for upper gastrointestinal tract lesions: a systematic review and meta-analysis
    Abdallah, Mohamed
    Suryawanshi, Gaurav
    McDonald, Nicholas
    Chandan, Saurabh
    Umar, Shifa
    Azeem, Nabeel
    Bilal, Mohammad
    SURGICAL ENDOSCOPY AND OTHER INTERVENTIONAL TECHNIQUES, 2023, 37 (05): : 3293 - 3305
  • [27] ENDOSCOPIC FULL-THICKNESS RESECTION FOR UPPER GASTROINTESTINAL TRACT LESIONS: A SYSTEMATIC REVIEW AND META-ANALYSIS
    Abdallah, Mohamed
    Suryawanshi, Gaurav
    McDonald, Nicholas M.
    Rosenberg, Carly
    Umar, Shifa
    Chandan, Saurabh
    Reardon, Erin E.
    Azeem, Nabeel
    Bilal, Mohammad
    GASTROINTESTINAL ENDOSCOPY, 2022, 95 (06) : AB215 - AB215
  • [28] Efficacy of Endoscopic Full-Thickness Resection for Duodenal Subepithelial Lesions: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis
    Ginnaram, Shravya
    Yarra, Pradeep
    Nugooru, Sudeep
    Thomas, Alexander J.
    Kiwan, Wissam
    Cheesman, Antonio R.
    Kim, Marina
    AMERICAN JOURNAL OF GASTROENTEROLOGY, 2024, 119 (10S): : S1142 - S1143
  • [29] Training and development in endoscopic full thickness resection
    Bazarbashi, Ahmad Najdat
    Thompson, Christopher C.
    TECHNIQUES IN GASTROINTESTINAL ENDOSCOPY, 2019, 21 (01) : 38 - 42
  • [30] Pathology perspective on endoscopic full thickness resection
    Fazlollahi, Ladan
    Remotti, Helen E.
    TECHNIQUES IN GASTROINTESTINAL ENDOSCOPY, 2019, 21 (01) : 7 - 12