Endoscopic Full Thickness Resection: A Systematic Review

被引:1
|
作者
Pal, Partha [1 ]
Ramchandani, Mohan [1 ]
Inavolu, Pradev [1 ]
Reddy, Duvvuru Nageshwar [1 ]
Tandan, Manu [1 ]
机构
[1] Asian Inst Gastroenterol, Dept Intervent Endoscopy, Hyderabad, Telangana, India
关键词
endoscopic full thickness resection; full thickness resection device; sub-epithelial lesions; over the scope dips; THE-SCOPE CLIP; GASTRIC SUBEPITHELIAL TUMORS; GASTROINTESTINAL STROMAL TUMOR; PUNCTURE-SUTURE DEVICE; MUSCULARIS PROPRIA; DEFECT CLOSURE; INCOMPLETE RESECTION; SUBMUCOSAL TUMORS; NEUROENDOCRINE TUMOR; APPENDICEAL ORIFICE;
D O I
10.1055/s-0042-1755304
中图分类号
R57 [消化系及腹部疾病];
学科分类号
摘要
Background Endoscopic full thickness resection (EFTR) is an emerging therapeutic option for resecting subepithelial lesions (SELs) and epithelial neoplasms. We aimed to systematically review the techniques, applications, outcomes, and complications of EFIR. Methods A systematic literature search was performed using PubMed. All relevant original research articles involving EFTR were included for the review along with case report/series describing novel/rare techniques from 2001 to February 2022. Results After screening 7,739 citations, finally 141 references were included. Non-exposed EFTR has lower probability of peritoneal contamination or tumor seeding compared with exposed EFTR. Among exposed EFTR, tunneled variety is associated with lower risk of peritoneal seeding or contamination compared with non-tunneled approach. Closure techniques involve though the scope (ITS) dips, loop and dips, over the scope dips (OTSC), full thickness resection device (FTRD), and endoscopic suturing/plicating/stapling devices. The indications of EFTR range from esophagus to rectum and include SELs arising from muscularis propria (MP), non-lifting adenoma, recurrent adenoma, and even early gastric cancer (EGC) or superficial colorectal carcinoma. Other indications include difficult locations (involving appendicular orifice or diverticulum) and full thickness biopsy for motility disorders. The main limitation of FTRD is feasibility in smaller lesions (<20-25 mm), which can be circumvented by hybrid EFTR techniques. Oncologic resection with lymphadencetomy for superficial GI malignancy can be accomplished by hybrid natural orifice transluminal endoscopic surgery (NOTES) combining EFTR and NOTES. Bleeding, perforation, appendicitis, enterocolonic fistula, FTRD malfunction, peritoneal tumor seeding, and contamination are among various adverse events. Post OTSC artifacts need to be differentiated from recurrent/residual lesions to avoid re-FTRD/surgery. Conclusion EFTR is safe and effective therapeutic option for SELs, recurrent and non-lifting adenomas, tumors in difficult locations and selected cases of superficial GI carcinoma.
引用
收藏
页码:152 / 169
页数:18
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [1] SYSTEMATIC REVIEW OF ENDOSCOPIC FULL THICKNESS RESECTION (EFTR) TECHNIQUES FOR COLONIC LESIONS
    Brigic, A.
    Symons, N. R. A.
    Faiz, O.
    Fraser, C.
    Clark, S. K.
    Kennedy, R. H.
    GUT, 2013, 62 : A48 - A49
  • [2] ENDOSCOPIC FULL THICKNESS RESECTION OF COLORECTAL LESIONS: A SYSTEMATIC REVIEW AND META-ANALYSIS
    Bazarbashi, Ahmad Najdat
    McCarty, Thomas R.
    Dolan, Russell D.
    Hathorn, Kelly
    Thompson, Christopher C.
    Aihara, Hiroyuki
    GASTROINTESTINAL ENDOSCOPY, 2020, 91 (06) : AB462 - AB462
  • [3] ENDOSCOPIC FULL THICKNESS RESECTION FOR COLORECTAL LESIONS: A SYSTEMATIC REVIEW AND META-ANALYSIS.
    McKechnie, T.
    Govind, S.
    Lee, J.
    Lee, Y.
    Hong, D.
    Eskicioglu, C.
    DISEASES OF THE COLON & RECTUM, 2022, 65 (05) : 156 - 157
  • [4] Endoscopic Full Thickness Resection
    Rajan, Elizabeth
    Song, Louis M. Wong Kee
    GASTROENTEROLOGY, 2018, 154 (07) : 1925 - +
  • [5] Efficacy and Safety of Endoscopic Full Thickness Resection (EFTR) of Colorectal Neoplasms Using the Full Thickness Resection Device (FTRD): A Systematic Review and Pooled Analysis
    Dasari, Chandra S.
    Nutalapati, Venkat
    Duvvuri, Abhiram
    Chandrasekar, Viveksandeep Thoguluva
    Malik, Afeerah
    Kohli, Divyanshoo
    Sharma, Prateek
    AMERICAN JOURNAL OF GASTROENTEROLOGY, 2019, 114 : S542 - S542
  • [6] Endoscopic Full-Thickness Resection for Colorectal Lesions: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis
    McKechnie, Tyler
    Govind, Shaylan
    Lee, Jay
    Lee, Yung
    Hong, Dennis
    Eskicioglu, Cagla
    JOURNAL OF SURGICAL RESEARCH, 2022, 280 : 440 - 449
  • [7] A systematic review regarding the feasibility and safety of endoscopic full thickness resection (EFTR) for colonic lesions
    Brigic, Adela
    Symons, Nicholas R. A.
    Faiz, Omar
    Fraser, Chris
    Clark, Susan K.
    Kennedy, Robin H.
    SURGICAL ENDOSCOPY AND OTHER INTERVENTIONAL TECHNIQUES, 2013, 27 (10): : 3520 - 3529
  • [8] Endoscopic full-thickness resection of colorectal lesions: a systematic review and meta-analysis
    Dolan, Russell D.
    Bazarbashi, Ahmad Najdat
    McCarty, Thomas R.
    Thompson, Christopher C.
    Aihara, Hiroyuki
    GASTROINTESTINAL ENDOSCOPY, 2022, 95 (02) : 216 - +
  • [9] DEVICE ASSISTED ENDOSCOPIC FULL THICKNESS RESECTION IN COLORECTUM: A SYSTEMATIC REVIEW AND META-ANALYSIS
    Nabi, Zaheer
    Dhar, Jahnvi
    Samanta, Jayanta
    Duvvur, Nageshwar
    GASTROINTESTINAL ENDOSCOPY, 2023, 97 (06) : AB721 - AB722
  • [10] A systematic review regarding the feasibility and safety of endoscopic full thickness resection (EFTR) for colonic lesions
    Adela Brigic
    Nicholas R. A. Symons
    Omar Faiz
    Chris Fraser
    Susan K. Clark
    Robin H. Kennedy
    Surgical Endoscopy, 2013, 27 : 3520 - 3529