Diffusion auction design

被引:8
|
作者
Li, Bin [1 ,2 ]
Hao, Dong [2 ]
Gao, Hui [2 ]
Zhao, Dengji [3 ]
机构
[1] Nanjing Univ Sci & Technol, Sch Comp Sci & Engn, Nanjing, Peoples R China
[2] Univ Elect Sci & Technol China, Sch Comp Sci & Engn, Chengdu, Peoples R China
[3] ShanghaiTech Univ, Sch Informat Sci & Technol, Shanghai, Peoples R China
关键词
Mechanism design; Auction; Information diffusion; Social network; Revenue optimization; MECHANISMS; REVENUE; COST;
D O I
10.1016/j.artint.2021.103631
中图分类号
TP18 [人工智能理论];
学科分类号
081104 ; 0812 ; 0835 ; 1405 ;
摘要
This paper studies an auction design problem for a seller to sell a single commodity in a social network, where each individual (the seller or a buyer) can only communicate with her neighbors. The challenge is to design a mechanism to incentivize the buyers, who are aware of the auction, to further propagate the information to their neighbors, so that more buyers can participate in the auction and hence, the seller will be able to make a higher revenue and a higher welfare. We build a general framework for this new scenario and propose several novel diffusion auctions, which not only incentivize the buyers to report their valuations on the commodity truthfully, but also to propagate the auction information to all their neighbors. Particularly, the direct extension of the well-known Vickrey-Clarke-Groves (VCG) mechanism on social networks can have the incentives, but it will decrease the seller's revenue or even lead to a deficit. We also show that in the social network setting all efficient mechanisms that are individually rational and incentive compatible can lead to a deficit. The goal in this article is to increase the seller's revenue by attracting more buyers, so we give up welfare maximization and propose a class of mechanisms called critical diffusion mechanisms. It is proved that both the seller's revenue and the social welfare achieved in critical diffusion mechanisms are not less than that given in the VCG mechanism before attracting new buyers. The intuition behind the proposed mechanisms is that buyers who join the mechanism earlier have higher priorities to buy the commodity. If a buyer does not win the commodity because of her propagation, then she will be compensated. The formalization of the problem has not been well-studied in the literature of mechanism design, and there are many open problems worth further investigation. The study of this problem will provide insights for the emerging market based on the participants' recommendations via their social networks. (C) 2021 Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.
引用
收藏
页数:20
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [21] Mode Connectivity in Auction Design
    Hertrich, Christoph
    Tao, Yixin
    Vegh, Laszlo A.
    [J]. ADVANCES IN NEURAL INFORMATION PROCESSING SYSTEMS 36 (NEURIPS 2023), 2023,
  • [22] On Auction Design for Crowd Sensing
    Chen, Kewei
    Gupta, Vijay
    Huang, Yih-Fang
    [J]. 2016 19TH INTERNATIONAL CONFERENCE ON INFORMATION FUSION (FUSION), 2016, : 334 - 339
  • [23] A parametrization of the auction design space
    Wurman, PR
    Wellman, MP
    Walsh, WE
    [J]. GAMES AND ECONOMIC BEHAVIOR, 2001, 35 (1-2) : 304 - 338
  • [24] Central counterparty auction design
    Ferrara, Gerardo
    Li, Xin
    Marszalec, Daniel
    [J]. JOURNAL OF FINANCIAL MARKET INFRASTRUCTURES, 2019, 8 (02): : 47 - 58
  • [25] Auction Design with a Revenue Target
    Goldberg, Paul W.
    Tang, Bo
    [J]. ALGORITHMIC GAME THEORY, SAGT 2015, 2015, 9347 : 137 - 149
  • [26] Auction design with opportunity cost
    Lu, Jingfeng
    [J]. ECONOMIC THEORY, 2009, 38 (01) : 73 - 103
  • [27] Frontiers in spectrum auction design
    Bichler, Martin
    Goeree, Jacob K.
    [J]. INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF INDUSTRIAL ORGANIZATION, 2017, 50 : 372 - 391
  • [28] Auction design with opportunity cost
    Jingfeng Lu
    [J]. Economic Theory, 2009, 38 : 73 - 103
  • [30] Buyers' welfare maximizing auction design
    Bauer, Sebastian D.
    [J]. INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF GAME THEORY, 2023, 52 (02) : 555 - 567