Comparison of an extended-release formulation of granisetron (APF530) versus palonosetron for the prevention of chemotherapy-induced nausea and vomiting associated with moderately or highly emetogenic chemotherapy: results of a prospective, randomized, double-blind, noninferiority phase 3 trial

被引:35
|
作者
Raftopoulos, Harry [1 ]
Cooper, William [2 ]
O'Boyle, Erin [3 ]
Gabrail, Nashat [4 ]
Boccia, Ralph [5 ]
Gralla, Richard J. [6 ]
机构
[1] Hofstra North Shore LIJ Sch Med, Lake Success, NY 11042 USA
[2] TFS Int, Flemington, NJ 08822 USA
[3] FibroGen Inc, San Francisco, CA 94158 USA
[4] Gabrail Canc Ctr, Canton, OH 44718 USA
[5] Ctr Canc & Blood Disorders, Bethesda, MD 20819 USA
[6] Albert Einstein Coll Med, Jacobi Med Ctr, Bronx, NY 10461 USA
关键词
Cancer; Chemotherapy-induced nausea and vomiting (CINV); Extended-release; Granisetron; Subcutaneous; APF530; 5-HT3 RECEPTOR ANTAGONIST; GUIDELINE UPDATE; DELAYED EMESIS; ONDANSETRON; ANTIEMETICS;
D O I
10.1007/s00520-014-2400-3
中图分类号
R73 [肿瘤学];
学科分类号
100214 ;
摘要
Subcutaneous APF530 provides controlled sustained release of granisetron to prevent acute (0-24 h) and delayed (24-120 h) chemotherapy-induced nausea and vomiting (CINV). This randomized, double-blind phase 3 trial compared APF530 and palonosetron in preventing acute and delayed CINV after moderately (MEC) or highly emetogenic chemotherapy (HEC). Patients receiving single-day MEC or HEC received single-dose APF530 250 or 500 mg subcutaneously (SC) (granisetron 5 or 10 mg) or intravenous palonosetron 0.25 mg. Primary objectives were to establish APF530 noninferiority to palonosetron for preventing acute CINV following MEC or HEC and delayed CINV following MEC and to determine APF530 superiority to palonosetron for preventing delayed CINV following HEC. The primary efficacy end point was complete response (CR [using CI difference for APF530 -aEuro parts per thousand palonosetron]). A lower confidence bound greater than -15 % indicated noninferiority. In the modified intent-to-treat population (MEC = 634; HEC = 707), both APF530 doses were noninferior to palonosetron in preventing acute CINV after MEC (CRs 74.8 % [-9.8, 9.3] and 76.9 % [-7.5, 11.4], respectively, vs. 75.0 % palonosetron) and after HEC (CRs 77.7 % [-11.5, 5.5] and 81.3 % [-7.7, 8.7], respectively, vs. 80.7 % palonosetron). APF530 500 mg was noninferior to palonosetron in preventing delayed CINV after MEC (CR 58.5 % [-9.5, 12.1] vs. 57.2 % palonosetron) but not superior in preventing delayed CINV after HEC. Adverse events were generally mild and unrelated to treatment, the most common (excluding injection-site reactions) being constipation. A single subcutaneous APF530 injection offers a convenient alternative to palonosetron for preventing acute and delayed CINV after MEC or HEC.
引用
收藏
页码:723 / 732
页数:10
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [31] Granisetron extended-release subcutaneous injection versus palonosetron infusion for preventing chemotherapy-induced nausea and vomiting: A cost analysis.
    Kumar, Vikas
    Barnes, Martin
    Calcanes, George
    Mosier, Michael
    Virgilio, Danille
    Vacirca, Jeffrey L.
    JOURNAL OF CLINICAL ONCOLOGY, 2021, 39 (15)
  • [32] A phase III, randomized, double-blind study of single-dose intravenous fosaprepitant in preventing chemotherapy-induced nausea and vomiting associated with moderately emetogenic chemotherapy
    Rapoport, Bernardo Leon
    Weinstein, Cindy
    Camacho, Elber S.
    Khanani, Saleem A.
    Beckford-Brathwaite, Elizabeth
    Kevill, Lydia
    Vallejos, Waldimir
    Liang, Li Wen
    Noga, Stephen Joseph
    JOURNAL OF CLINICAL ONCOLOGY, 2015, 33 (15)
  • [33] Comparison of single-dose oral granisetron versus intravenous ondansetron in the prevention of nausea and vomiting induced by moderately emetogenic chemotherapy: A multicenter, double-blind, randomized parallel study
    Perez, EA
    Hesketh, P
    Sandbach, J
    Reeves, J
    Chawla, S
    Markman, M
    Hainsworth, J
    Bushnell, W
    Friedman, C
    JOURNAL OF CLINICAL ONCOLOGY, 1998, 16 (02) : 754 - 760
  • [34] Palonosetron versus Granisetron in Combination with Aprepitant and Dexamethasone for the Prevention of Chemotherapy-Induced Nausea and Vomiting after Moderately Emetogenic Chemotherapy: A Single-Institutional Retrospective Cohort Study
    Miyoshi, Takanori
    Miyashita, Hiroo
    Matsuo, Naomi
    Odawara, Miki
    Hori, Minako
    Hiraki, Yoichi
    Kawanaka, Hirofumi
    BIOLOGICAL & PHARMACEUTICAL BULLETIN, 2021, 44 (10) : 1413 - 1418
  • [35] Exploratory Analysis Comparing Fosnetupitant Versus Fosaprepitant for Prevention of Highly Emetogenic Chemotherapy-Induced Nausea and Vomiting (CINV): A Randomized, Double-Blind, Phase 3 Study (CONSOLE)
    Hata, Akito
    Shiraishi, Yoshimasa
    Inui, Naoki
    Okada, Morihito
    Morise, Masahiro
    Akiyoshi, Kohei
    Takeda, Masayuki
    Watanabe, Yasutaka
    Sugawara, Shunichi
    Shinagawa, Naofumi
    Kubota, Kaoru
    Saeki, Toshiaki
    Tamura, Tomohide
    ONCOLOGY AND THERAPY, 2022, 10 (01) : 253 - 262
  • [36] Exploratory Analysis Comparing Fosnetupitant Versus Fosaprepitant for Prevention of Highly Emetogenic Chemotherapy-Induced Nausea and Vomiting (CINV): A Randomized, Double-Blind, Phase 3 Study (CONSOLE)
    Akito Hata
    Yoshimasa Shiraishi
    Naoki Inui
    Morihito Okada
    Masahiro Morise
    Kohei Akiyoshi
    Masayuki Takeda
    Yasutaka Watanabe
    Shunichi Sugawara
    Naofumi Shinagawa
    Kaoru Kubota
    Toshiaki Saeki
    Tomohide Tamura
    Oncology and Therapy, 2022, 10 : 253 - 262
  • [37] Aprepitant for the prevention of chemotherapy-induced nausea and vomiting in children: a randomised, double-blind, phase 3 trial
    Kang, Hyoung Jin
    Loftus, Susan
    Taylor, Arlene
    DiCristina, Cara
    Green, Stuart
    Zwaan, Christian Michel
    LANCET ONCOLOGY, 2015, 16 (04): : 385 - 394
  • [38] Sustainability of antiemetic responses with APF530 (sustained-release granisetron) during multiple cycles of moderately (MEC) and highly (HEC) emetogenic chemotherapy regimens: Results of a randomized phase III trial.
    Boccia, Ralph V.
    Cooper, William
    O'Boyle, Erin
    JOURNAL OF CLINICAL ONCOLOGY, 2013, 31 (15)
  • [39] Economic analysis of palonosetron versus granisetron in the standard triplet regimen for preventing chemotherapy-induced nausea and vomiting in patients receiving highly emetogenic chemotherapy in Japan (TRIPLE phase III trial)
    Shimizu, Hisanori
    Suzuki, Kenichi
    Uchikura, Takeshi
    Tsuji, Daiki
    Yamanaka, Takeharu
    Hashimoto, Hironobu
    Goto, Koichi
    Matsui, Reiko
    Seki, Nobuhiko
    Shimada, Toshikazu
    Ikeda, Shunya
    Ikegami, Naoki
    Hama, Toshihiro
    Yamamoto, Nobuyuki
    Sasaki, Tadanori
    JOURNAL OF PHARMACEUTICAL HEALTH CARE AND SCIENCES, 2018, 4
  • [40] Risk factors associated with chemotherapy-induced nausea and vomiting in the triplet antiemetic regimen including palonosetron or granisetron for cisplatin-based chemotherapy: analysis of a randomized, double-blind controlled trial
    Daiki Tsuji
    Kenichi Suzuki
    Yohei Kawasaki
    Koichi Goto
    Reiko Matsui
    Nobuhiko Seki
    Hironobu Hashimoto
    Toshihiro Hama
    Takeharu Yamanaka
    Nobuyuki Yamamoto
    Kunihiko Itoh
    Supportive Care in Cancer, 2019, 27 : 1139 - 1147