The Nagoya Protocol and Its Implications on the EU Atlantic Area Countries

被引:10
|
作者
Martins, Joana [1 ,2 ]
Cruz, Diogo [1 ,2 ]
Vasconcelos, Vitor [1 ,2 ]
机构
[1] Univ Porto, Fac Sci, Rua Campo Alegre, P-4169007 Porto, Portugal
[2] Univ Porto, Terminal Cruzeiros Porto Leixoes, Interdisciplinary Ctr Marine & Environm Res, CIIMAR CIMAR, Ave Gen Norton Matos S-N, P-4450208 Matosinhos, Portugal
关键词
biodiversity; genetic resources; regulation (EU) No; 511; 2014; access and benefit-sharing; Interreg Atlantic Area;
D O I
10.3390/jmse8020092
中图分类号
U6 [水路运输]; P75 [海洋工程];
学科分类号
0814 ; 081505 ; 0824 ; 082401 ;
摘要
The Nagoya Protocol on Access to Genetic Resources and Fair and Equitable Sharing of Benefits Arising from their Utilization came into force in October 2014. In the European Union (EU), new legislation had to be developed in order to apply the mandatory elements of the Protocol, namely, the Regulation (EU) No 511/2014 (ABS Regulation) and the Implementing Regulation (EU) 2015/1866, laying down detailed rules for the implementation of Regulation ABS with regard to the register of collection, monitor user compliance, and best practices. As a consequence, EU countries had to develop their own legislation in order to implement the Nagoya Protocol (NP), as well as the EU regulations. One important fact that distinguishes the national legislation of the EU countries is that some countries choose to control access to genetic resources (GR), while others do not apply access measures. The Atlantic Area countries in the EU share an attractive coastline with regard to the potential of their GR. In addition, the microalgae industry has been identified as a business sector with high potential. Therefore, it is important for GR users to be informed about the existing regulations and the national differences that may occur within EU countries. In this article, the origins and main content of the Nagoya Protocol are described, together with their implications at the EU level and particularly in the countries of the Atlantic Area region. As a result, a decision framework is proposed in order to support the GR users among this region.
引用
收藏
页数:20
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [41] EU Cohesion and Its Evaluation in the Case of Visegrad Four Countries
    Melecky, Lukas
    Skokan, Karel
    LIBEREC ECONOMIC FORUM 2011, 2011, : 314 - 326
  • [42] Performance of EU Countries over Time and Its Spatial Autocorrelation
    Vavrek, Roman
    Benkova, Eva
    PROCEEDINGS OF THE 4TH INTERNATIONAL CONFERENCE ON EUROPEAN INTEGRATION 2018 (ICEI 2018), PTS 1-3, 2018, : 1563 - 1570
  • [43] The mining industry and its position in the economic cycle of the EU countries
    Gavurova, Beata
    Behunova, Annamaria
    Tkacova, Andrea
    Perzel'ova, Ivana
    ACTA MONTANISTICA SLOVACA, 2017, 22 (03) : 278 - 286
  • [44] Wind Energy Potential of Turkey and its Place in EU Countries
    Cakir, Mutlu Tarik
    JOURNAL OF POLYTECHNIC-POLITEKNIK DERGISI, 2010, 13 (04): : 287 - 293
  • [45] THE MEANING OF BUSINESS REPUTATION AND THE WAYS OF ITS PROTECTION IN THE EU COUNTRIES
    Bazhanov, Valentyn
    Byelova, Lyudmyla
    Nakonechna, Oksana
    Kruhlenko, Lyudmyla
    Petrenko, Oksana
    AD ALTA-JOURNAL OF INTERDISCIPLINARY RESEARCH, 2022, 12 (01): : 71 - 75
  • [46] IFRS 9 and its behavior in the cycle: The evidence on EU countries
    Pastiranova, Olga
    Witzany, Jiri
    JOURNAL OF INTERNATIONAL FINANCIAL MANAGEMENT & ACCOUNTING, 2022, 33 (01) : 5 - 17
  • [47] Financial Situation and Its Consequences on the Quality of Life in the EU Countries
    Virag Havasi
    Social Indicators Research, 2013, 113 : 17 - 35
  • [48] Financial Situation and Its Consequences on the Quality of Life in the EU Countries
    Havasi, Virag
    SOCIAL INDICATORS RESEARCH, 2013, 113 (01) : 17 - 35
  • [49] Feasibility of hydrogen corridors between the EU and its neighbouring countries
    Wietschel, Martin
    Hasenauer, Ulrike
    RENEWABLE ENERGY, 2007, 32 (13) : 2129 - 2146
  • [50] EU28 COUNTRIES' COMPETITIVENESS AND ITS DRIVING FORCES
    Richterova, Eva
    Richter, Martin
    Sojkova, Zlata
    AGRARIAN PERSPECTIVES XXVIII: BUSINESS SCALE IN RELATION TO ECONOMICS, 2019, : 232 - 240