Cost-effectiveness of a behavioral intervention for persistent urinary incontinence in prostate cancer patients

被引:11
|
作者
Zhang, Amy Y. [1 ]
Fu, Alex Z. [2 ]
机构
[1] Case Western Reserve Univ, Frances Payne Bolton Sch Nursing, 10900 Euclid Ave, Cleveland, OH 44106 USA
[2] Georgetown Univ, Med Ctr, Dept Oncol, Washington, DC 20007 USA
基金
美国国家卫生研究院;
关键词
HEALTH-CARE UTILIZATION; OVERACTIVE BLADDER; RADICAL PROSTATECTOMY; SAMPLE; STATES; EQ-5D;
D O I
10.1002/pon.3849
中图分类号
R73 [肿瘤学];
学科分类号
100214 ;
摘要
ObjectiveThe aim of this study was to evaluate the cost-effectiveness of a behavioral intervention for urinary incontinence of prostate cancer patients. Study subjects were either participating in or eligible but declined (i.e., nonparticipating) the active intervention study. MethodsThe intervention-participating subjects were randomized into three groups, including two intervention groups (support and telephone groups) and a usual care reference group. Intervention-nonparticipating subjects were concurrently enrolled. Intervention effectiveness was assessed on the EQ-5D measure. The costs included direct healthcare cost from medical billing data, patient out-of-pocket expense, caregiver expense, patient loss-of-work cost, and intervention cost. We calculated incremental cost-effectiveness ratios (ICERs) from societal, provider, and patient perspectives. ResultsTwo hundred and sixty-seven intervention-participating and 69 intervention-nonparticipating post-cancer treatment patients were included. The support and telephone groups, but not the usual care group, had significantly higher EQ-5D index scores (0.054, p=0.033, and 0.057, p=0.026, respectively) than the intervention-nonparticipating group at month 6. Within 6months, intervention cost per subject was $252 and $484, respectively, for providers, and $564 and $203, respectively, for the support and phone group subjects. The final ICERs were $16,759 per quality-adjusted life year (QALY) and $12,561/QALY for support and telephone groups, compared with those of the intervention-nonparticipating group. These ICERs are much smaller than $50,000/QALY, the consensus threshold to determine cost-effectiveness for society. ConclusionsThe study interventions are cost-effective in consideration of eligible patients who declined the interventions. The interventions can provide meaningful outcome improvement on urinary continence at a low cost. This evidence provides critical information for future health policy decision-making of healthcare providers and payers. Copyright (c) 2015 John Wiley & Sons, Ltd.
引用
收藏
页码:421 / 427
页数:7
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [41] The cost-effectiveness of treatment with desloratadine in patients with persistent allergic rhinitis
    Sullivan, Patrick W.
    Navaratnam, Prakash
    Lorber, Richard
    Shekar, Tulin
    CURRENT MEDICAL RESEARCH AND OPINION, 2010, 26 (06) : 1389 - 1397
  • [42] Re: Cost-effectiveness of a pro-active approach of urinary incontinence in women Reply
    Vermeulen, Karin M.
    Visser, Els
    Messelink, Embert J.
    Berger, Marjolein Y.
    de Bock, Gertruida H.
    Dekker, Janny H.
    BJOG-AN INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF OBSTETRICS AND GYNAECOLOGY, 2016, 123 (13) : 2229 - 2230
  • [43] Cost-effectiveness analysis of the surgical treatment of female urinary incontinence using slings and meshes
    Montesino-Semper, Manuel F.
    Jimenez-Calvo, Jesus M.
    Cabases, Juan M.
    Sanchez-Iriso, Eduardo
    Hualde-Alfaro, Antonio
    Garcia-Garcia, Diego
    EUROPEAN JOURNAL OF OBSTETRICS & GYNECOLOGY AND REPRODUCTIVE BIOLOGY, 2013, 171 (01) : 180 - 186
  • [44] The cost-effectiveness of laparoscopic versus abdominal Burch procedures in women with urinary stress incontinence
    Kung, RC
    Lie, K
    Lee, P
    Drutz, HP
    JOURNAL OF THE AMERICAN ASSOCIATION OF GYNECOLOGIC LAPAROSCOPISTS, 1996, 3 (04): : 537 - 544
  • [45] Cost-Effectiveness of Including a Nurse Specialist in the Treatment of Urinary Incontinence in Primary Care in the Netherlands
    Holtzer-Goor, K. M.
    Gaultney, J. G.
    van Houten, P.
    Wagg, A. S.
    Huygens, S. A.
    Nielen, M. M. J.
    Albers-Heitner, C. P.
    Redekop, W. K.
    Rutten-van Molken, M. P.
    Al, M. J.
    PLOS ONE, 2015, 10 (10):
  • [47] Cost-effectiveness of MR Lymphography for the Detection of Lymph Node Metastases in Patients with Prostate Cancer
    Hovels, Anke M.
    Heesakkers, Roel A. M.
    Adang, Eddy M. M.
    Barentsz, Jelle O.
    Jager, Gerrit J.
    Severens, Johan L.
    RADIOLOGY, 2009, 252 (03) : 729 - 736
  • [48] EFFECTS AND COST-EFFECTIVENESS OF PROTOCOLIZED ASSESSMENT AND EVIDENCE-BASED TREATMENT OF URINARY INCONTINENCE: THE URINARY INCONTINENCE IN OLDER WOMEN TRIAL (URINO)
    Dekker, J. H.
    Visser, E.
    Vermeulen, K. M.
    Messelink, E. J.
    Schram, A. J.
    Kollen, B. J.
    Berger, M.
    de Bock, G. H.
    NEUROUROLOGY AND URODYNAMICS, 2012, 31 (06) : 733 - 734
  • [49] Cost-effectiveness of denosumab as a bone protective agent for patients with castration resistant prostate cancer
    Dellis, Athanasios
    Papatsoris, Athanasios
    EXPERT REVIEW OF PHARMACOECONOMICS & OUTCOMES RESEARCH, 2016, 16 (01) : 5 - 10
  • [50] Cost-effectiveness in the management of patients with oesophageal cancer
    Farndon, MA
    Wayman, J
    Clague, MB
    Griffin, SM
    BRITISH JOURNAL OF SURGERY, 1998, 85 (10) : 1394 - 1398