Metabolic biomarker signature to differentiate pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma from chronic pancreatitis

被引:201
|
作者
Mayerle, Julia [1 ,2 ]
Kalthoff, Holger [3 ]
Reszka, Regina [4 ]
Kamlage, Beate [4 ]
Peter, Erik [4 ]
Schniewind, Bodo [3 ]
Maldonado, Sandra Gonzalez [5 ]
Pilarsky, Christian [6 ]
Heidecke, Claus-Dieter [7 ]
Schatz, Philipp [4 ]
Distler, Marius [8 ]
Scheiber, Jonas A. [1 ]
Mahajan, Ujjwal M. [1 ,2 ]
Weiss, F. Ulrich [1 ]
Gruetzmann, Robert [6 ]
Lerch, Markus M. [1 ]
机构
[1] Ernst Moritz Arndt Univ Greifswald, Dept Med A, Univ Med, Greifswald, Germany
[2] Klinikum LMU Munchen Grosshadern, Med Klin & Poliklin 2, Munich, Germany
[3] UKSH, Inst Expt Canc Res IET, Sect Mol Oncol, Kiel, Germany
[4] Metan Hlth GmbH, Berlin, Germany
[5] Metanomics GmbH, Berlin, Germany
[6] Univ Hosp, Dept Surg, Erlangen, Germany
[7] Ernst Moritz Arndt Univ Greifswald, Dept Gen Visceral Thorac & Vasc Surg, Univ Med Greifswald, Greifswald, Germany
[8] Tech Univ Dresden, Clin & Outpatient Clin Visceral Thorax & Vasc Sur, Med Fak, Dresden, Germany
关键词
HEREDITARY PANCREATITIS; DIAGNOSTIC-APPROACH; SERUM METABOLOMICS; CANCER; RISK; PERFORMANCE; MARKERS; CA19-9; BURDEN; MODELS;
D O I
10.1136/gutjnl-2016-312432
中图分类号
R57 [消化系及腹部疾病];
学科分类号
摘要
Objective Current non-invasive diagnostic tests can distinguish between pancreatic cancer (pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma (PDAC)) and chronic pancreatitis (CP) in only about two thirds of patients. We have searched for blood-derived metabolite biomarkers for this diagnostic purpose. Design For a case-control study in three tertiary referral centres, 914 subjects were prospectively recruited with PDAC (n=271), CP (n=282), liver cirrhosis (n=100) or healthy as well as non-pancreatic disease controls (n=261) in three consecutive studies. Metabolomic profiles of plasma and serum samples were generated from 477 metabolites identified by gas chromatography-mass spectrometry and liquid chromatography-tandem mass spectrometry. Results A biomarker signature (nine metabolites and additionally CA19-9) was identified for the differential diagnosis between PDAC and CP. The biomarker signature distinguished PDAC from CP in the training set with an area under the curve (AUC) of 0.96 (95% CI 0.93-0.98). The biomarker signature cut-off of 0.384 at 85% fixed specificity showed a sensitivity of 94.9% (95% CI 87.0%-97.0%). In the test set, an AUC of 0.94 (95% CI 0.91-0.97) and, using the same cut-off, a sensitivity of 89.9% (95% CI 81.0%-95.5%) and a specificity of 91.3% (95% CI 82.8%-96.4%) were achieved, successfully validating the biomarker signature. Conclusions In patients with CP with an increased risk for pancreatic cancer (cumulative incidence 1.95%), the performance of this biomarker signature results in a negative predictive value of 99.9% (95% CI 99.7%-99.9%) (training set) and 99.8% (95% CI 99.6%-99.9%) (test set). In one third of our patients, the clinical use of this biomarker signature would have improved diagnosis and treatment stratification in comparison to CA19-9.
引用
收藏
页码:128 / 137
页数:10
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [21] Differentiation of Pancreatic Ductal Adenocarcinoma From Chronic Pancreatitis by PAM4 Immunohistochemistry
    Shi, Chanjuan
    Merchant, Nipun
    Newsome, Guy
    Goldenberg, David M.
    Gold, David V.
    ARCHIVES OF PATHOLOGY & LABORATORY MEDICINE, 2014, 138 (02) : 220 - 228
  • [22] Comparative Characterization of Stroma Cells and Ductal Epithelium in Chronic Pancreatitis and Pancreatic Ductal Adenocarcinoma
    Helm, Ole
    Mennrich, Ruben
    Petrick, Domantas
    Goebel, Lisa
    Freitag-Wolf, Sandra
    Roeder, Christian
    Kalthoff, Holger
    Roecken, Christoph
    Sipos, Bence
    Kabelitz, Dieter
    Schaefer, Heiner
    Oberg, Hans-Heinrich
    Wesch, Daniela
    Sebens, Susanne
    PLOS ONE, 2014, 9 (05):
  • [23] Two nomograms for differentiating mass-forming chronic pancreatitis from pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma in patients with chronic pancreatitis
    Zhang, Hao
    Meng, Yinghao
    Li, Qi
    Yu, Jieyu
    Liu, Fang
    Fang, Xu
    Li, Jing
    Feng, Xiaochen
    Zhou, Jian
    Zhu, Mengmeng
    Li, Na
    Lu, Jianping
    Shao, Chengwei
    Bian, Yun
    EUROPEAN RADIOLOGY, 2022, 32 (09) : 6336 - 6347
  • [24] Two nomograms for differentiating mass-forming chronic pancreatitis from pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma in patients with chronic pancreatitis
    Hao Zhang
    Yinghao Meng
    Qi Li
    Jieyu Yu
    Fang Liu
    Xu Fang
    Jing Li
    Xiaochen Feng
    Jian Zhou
    Mengmeng Zhu
    Na Li
    Jianping Lu
    Chengwei Shao
    Yun Bian
    European Radiology, 2022, 32 : 6336 - 6347
  • [25] Utility of CT to Differentiate Pancreatic Parenchymal Metastasis from Pancreatic Ductal Adenocarcinoma
    Barat, Maxime
    Aldhaheri, Rauda
    Dohan, Anthony
    Fuks, David
    Kedra, Alice
    Hoeffel, Christine
    Oudjit, Ammar
    Coriat, Romain
    Barret, Maximilien
    Terris, Benoit
    Marchese, Ugo
    Soyer, Philippe
    CANCERS, 2021, 13 (13)
  • [26] An Extremely Rare Variant of Pancreatic Ductal Adenocarcinoma Masquerading as Chronic Pancreatitis
    Smith, C. J.
    Scott, K.
    Parrett, T.
    Rao, D.
    AMERICAN JOURNAL OF CLINICAL PATHOLOGY, 2022, 158 (SUPP 1) : S58 - S59
  • [27] Biomarker detection in pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma
    Klett, H.
    Klose, M.
    Kowar, S.
    Bronsert, P.
    Kuesters, S.
    Werner, M.
    Christoph, P.
    Busch, H.
    Boerries, M.
    EUROPEAN JOURNAL OF CANCER, 2016, 61 : S177 - S178
  • [28] Markers of Bone Metabolism in Patients With Chronic Pancreatitis and Pancreatic Ductal Adenocarcinoma
    Pezzilli, Raffaele
    d'Eril, Gian Vico Melzi
    Barassi, Alessandra
    MEDICINE, 2015, 94 (42) : e1754
  • [29] Protein biomarker for pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma
    Burki, Talha K.
    LANCET ONCOLOGY, 2017, 18 (09): : E511 - E511
  • [30] The mTOR Pathway is Frequently Activated in Pancreatic Ductal Adenocarcinoma and Chronic Pancreatitis
    Bellizzi, Andrew M.
    Bloomston, Mark
    Zhou, Xiao-Ping
    Iwenofu, Obiajulu Hans
    Frankel, Wendy L.
    APPLIED IMMUNOHISTOCHEMISTRY & MOLECULAR MORPHOLOGY, 2010, 18 (05) : 442 - 447