Software Model Checking Using Languages of Nested Trees

被引:17
|
作者
Alur, Rajeev [1 ]
Chaudhuri, Swarat [2 ]
Madhusudan, P. [3 ]
机构
[1] Univ Penn, Dept Comp & Informat Sci, Philadelphia, PA 19104 USA
[2] Rice Univ, Dept Comp Sci, Houston, TX 77005 USA
[3] Univ Illinois, Champaign, IL 61802 USA
基金
美国国家科学基金会;
关键词
Algorithms; Theory; Verification; Logic; specification; verification; mu-calculus; infinite-state; model-checking; games; pushdown systems; interprocedural analysis; TEMPORAL LOGIC;
D O I
10.1145/2039346.2039347
中图分类号
TP31 [计算机软件];
学科分类号
081202 ; 0835 ;
摘要
While model checking of pushdown systems is by now an established technique in software verification, temporal logics and automata traditionally used in this area are unattractive on two counts. First, logics and automata traditionally used in model checking cannot express requirements such as pre/post-conditions that are basic to analysis of software. Second, unlike in the finite-state world, where the mu-calculus has a symbolic model-checking algorithm and serves as an "assembly language" to which temporal logics can be compiled, there is no common formalism-either fixpoint-based or automata-theoretic-to model-check requirements on pushdown models. In this article, we introduce a new theory of temporal logics and automata that addresses the above issues, and provides a unified foundation for the verification of pushdown systems. The key idea here is to view a program as a generator of structures known as nested trees as opposed to trees. A fixpoint logic (called NT-mu) and a class of automata (called nested tree automata) interpreted on languages of these structures are now defined, and branching-time model-checking is phrased as language inclusion and membership problems for these languages. We show that NT-mu and nested tree automata allow the specification of a new frontier of requirements usable in software verification. At the same time, their model checking problem has the same worst-case complexity as their traditional analogs, and can be solved symbolically using a fixpoint computation that generalizes, and includes as a special case, "summary"-based computations traditionally used in interprocedural program analysis. We also show that our logics and automata define a robust class of languages-in particular, just as the mu-calculus is equivalent to alternating parity automata on trees, NT-mu is equivalent to alternating parity automata on nested trees. Categories and Subject Descriptors: D. 2.4 [Software Engineering]: Software/Program Verification-Model checking; F. 1.1 [Computation by abstract devices]: Models of computation-Automata; F. 3.1 [Theory of Computation]: Specifying and Verifying and Reasoning about Programs; F. 4.1 [Theory of Computation]: Mathematical Logic-Temporal logic
引用
收藏
页数:45
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [31] Towards Automated Software Verification Using Model Checking Techniques
    Asadollahi, Somayeh
    Rafe, Vahid
    Rafeh, Reza
    Rahmani, Adel T.
    THIRD INTERNATIONAL SYMPOSIUM ON THEORETICAL ASPECTS OF SOFTWARE ENGINEERING, PROCEEDINGS, 2009, : 305 - +
  • [32] Model checking on trees with path equivalences
    Alur, Rajeev
    Cerny, Pavol
    Chaudhuri, Swarat
    TOOLS AND ALGORITHMS FOR THE CONSTRUCTION AND ANALYSIS OF SYSTEMS, PROCEEDINGS, 2007, 4424 : 664 - +
  • [33] On the Model Checking of the Graded μ-calculus on Trees
    Barcenas, Everardo
    Benitez-Guerrero, Edgard
    Lavalle, Jesus
    ADVANCES IN ARTIFICIAL INTELLIGENCE AND SOFT COMPUTING, MICAI 2015, PT I, 2015, 9413 : 178 - 189
  • [34] MODEL CHECKING OF COMPONENT BASED SOFTWARE USING COMPOSITIONAL REDUCTIONS
    Izadi, Mohammad
    Movaghar, Ali
    INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF SOFTWARE ENGINEERING AND KNOWLEDGE ENGINEERING, 2008, 18 (05) : 683 - 712
  • [35] Model-Checking Parse Trees
    Boral, Anudhyan
    Schmitz, Sylvain
    2013 28TH ANNUAL IEEE/ACM SYMPOSIUM ON LOGIC IN COMPUTER SCIENCE (LICS), 2013, : 153 - 162
  • [36] Symbolic model checking with rich assertional languages
    Kesten, Y
    Maler, O
    Marcus, M
    Pnueli, A
    Shahar, E
    THEORETICAL COMPUTER SCIENCE, 2001, 256 (1-2) : 93 - 112
  • [37] Using Composition Trees to Model and Compare Software Process
    Wen, Lian
    Tuffley, David
    Rout, Terry
    SOFTWARE PROCESS IMPROVEMENT AND CAPABILITY DETERMINATION, 2011, 155 : 1 - 15
  • [38] Symbolic model checking with rich assertional languages
    Kesten, Y
    Maler, O
    Marcus, M
    Pnueli, A
    Shahar, E
    COMPUTER AIDED VERIFICATION, 1997, 1254 : 424 - 435
  • [40] A model driven software factory using domain specific languages
    Warmer, Jos
    Model Driven Architecture - Foundations and Applications, 2007, 4530 : 194 - 203