Techno-Economic Evaluation of Iron and Aluminum Coagulants on Se(IV) Removal

被引:14
|
作者
Kalaitzidou, Kyriaki [1 ]
Bakouros, Loukas [1 ]
Mitrakas, Manassis [1 ]
机构
[1] Aristotle Univ Thessaloniki, Dept Chem Engn, Thessaloniki 54124, Greece
关键词
tetravalent selenium Se(IV); Fe-based coagulants; PACl; polluted waters; cost estimation; SELENIUM REMOVAL; ARSENIC REMOVAL; OXY-HYDROXIDES; WATER; SE(VI); ADSORPTION;
D O I
10.3390/w12030672
中图分类号
X [环境科学、安全科学];
学科分类号
08 ; 0830 ;
摘要
Research on selenium pollution in natural waters is continuous and discouraging. In this study, coagulation/precipitation was applied with the use of Fe(II), Fe(III), and poly-aluminum chloride (PACl) salts for Se(IV) removal at concentration range 10-100 mu g Se(IV)/L that is commonly found in drinking waters. Prehydrolyzed Fe(III)-FeCl3 delivered the best uptake capacity (Q(10) = 8.9 mg Se(IV)/g Fe(III) at pH 6) at the residual concentration equal to the drinking water regulation limit of 10 mu g/L. This was much higher than the efficiencies achieved when applying the other coagulants: i.e., Q(10) = 7.3 mg Se(IV)/g Fe3+-FeClSO4, Q(10) = 6.4 mg Se(IV)/g prehydrolyzed Fe(III)-Fe-2(SO4)(3) and 0.7 mg Se(IV)/g Al-PACl at pH 6, and Q(10) = 0.45 mg Se(IV)/g Fe(II) at pH 7.2. Comparing the different sources of Fe(III), it is apparent that Se(IV) uptake capacity is inhibited by the presence of SO42- in crystal structure of prehydrolyzed Fe-2(SO4)(3), while prehydrolyzed FeCl3 favors Se(IV) uptake. Temperature effect data showed that coagulation/precipitation is exothermic. In techno-economic terms, the optimal conditions for Se(IV) removal are coagulation/precipitation at pH values lower than 7 using prehydrolyzed Fe(III)-FeCl3, which provides a combination of minimum sludge production and lower operating cost.
引用
收藏
页数:10
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [31] Techno-Economic Evaluation of Phosphorous Recovery in Soybean Biodiesel Process
    Juneja, Ankita
    Kurambhatti, Chinmay
    Kumar, Deepak
    Singh, Vijay
    PROCESSES, 2022, 10 (08)
  • [32] TECHNO-ECONOMIC EVALUATION OF AN IGCC POWER PLANT WITH CARBON CAPTURE
    Majoumerd, Mohammad Mansouri
    Assadi, Mohsen
    Breuhaus, Peter
    PROCEEDINGS OF THE ASME TURBO EXPO: TURBINE TECHNICAL CONFERENCE AND EXPOSITION, 2013, VOL 2, 2013,
  • [33] Biomass pellets for power generation in India: a techno-economic evaluation
    Purohit, Pallav
    Chaturvedi, Vaibhav
    ENVIRONMENTAL SCIENCE AND POLLUTION RESEARCH, 2018, 25 (29) : 29614 - 29632
  • [34] Techno-economic evaluation of flexible CCS concepts in a CHP system
    Kujanpaa, Lauri
    Pursiheimo, Esa
    13TH INTERNATIONAL CONFERENCE ON GREENHOUSE GAS CONTROL TECHNOLOGIES, GHGT-13, 2017, 114 : 6638 - 6649
  • [35] Techno-economic evaluation for the improvement of MSW collection in Somaliland and Puntland
    Collivignarelli, Carlo
    Vaccari, Mentore
    Di Bella, Veronica
    Giardina, Daniela
    WASTE MANAGEMENT & RESEARCH, 2011, 29 (05) : 521 - 531
  • [36] A techno-economic evaluation of utility scale solar power generation
    Shakeel, Mohammad Raghib
    Mokheimer, Esmail M. A.
    ENERGY, 2022, 261
  • [37] Furfural to FDCA: systematic process design and techno-economic evaluation
    Dubbink, Guus H. C.
    Geverink, Thomas R. J.
    Haar, Bas
    Koets, Harald W.
    Kumar, Abhay
    van den Berg, Henk
    van der Ham, Aloijsius G. J.
    Lange, Jean-Paul
    BIOFUELS BIOPRODUCTS & BIOREFINING-BIOFPR, 2021, 15 (04): : 1021 - 1030
  • [38] Techno-economic evaluation of a solar powered water desalination plant
    Fiorenza, G
    Sharma, VK
    Braccio, G
    ENERGY CONVERSION AND MANAGEMENT, 2003, 44 (14) : 2217 - 2240
  • [39] A techno-economic evaluation of utility scale solar power generation
    Mechanical Engineering Department, King Fahd University of Petroleum & Minerals, Dhahran, Saudi Arabia
    不详
    不详
    Energy,
  • [40] Techno-economic evaluation of commercially available high fogging systems
    Savic, Sasha M.
    Rostek, Katharina E.
    Klaesson, Daniel K.
    Proceedings of the ASME Turbo Expo 2005, Vol 4, 2005, : 99 - 107