Interindividual variability in response to protein and fish oil supplementation in older adults: a randomized controlled trial

被引:10
|
作者
Murphy, Caoileann H. [1 ,2 ]
Connolly, Claire [1 ]
Flanagan, Ellen M. [1 ]
Mitchelson, Kathleen A. J. [1 ]
Castro, Elena de Marco [1 ]
Egan, Brendan [3 ]
Brennan, Lorraine [1 ]
Roche, Helen M. [1 ,4 ]
机构
[1] Univ Coll Dublin UCD, Sch Publ Hlth Physiotherapy & Sport Sci, UCD Conway Inst, UCD Inst Food & Hlth, Dublin, Ireland
[2] Teagasc Food Res CentreDublin, Dublin, Ireland
[3] Dublin City Univ, Sch Hlth & Human Performance, Dublin, Ireland
[4] Queens Univ Belfast, Inst Global Food Secur, Belfast, Antrim, North Ireland
基金
爱尔兰科学基金会;
关键词
Sarcopenia; Protein; Leucine; Fish oil; Interindividual variability; Personalized nutrition; VITAMIN-D SUPPLEMENTATION; MUSCLE MASS; WHEY-PROTEIN; DOUBLE-BLIND; STRENGTH; LEUCINE; SARCOPENIA; NUTRITION; INSULIN; METAANALYSIS;
D O I
10.1002/jcsm.12936
中图分类号
R592 [老年病学]; C [社会科学总论];
学科分类号
03 ; 0303 ; 100203 ;
摘要
Background Precision nutrition is highly topical. However, no studies have explored the interindividual variability in response to nutrition interventions for sarcopenia. The purpose of this study was to determine the magnitude of interindividual variability in response to two nutrition supplementation interventions for sarcopenia and metabolic health, after accounting for sources of variability not attributable to supplementation. Methods A 24 week, randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled trial tested the impact of leucine-enriched protein (LEU-PRO), LEU-PRO plus long-chain n-3 PUFA (LEU-PRO+n-3) or control (CON) supplementation in older adults (n = 83, 71 +/- 6 years) at risk of sarcopenia. To estimate the true interindividual variability in response to supplementation (free of the variability due to measurement error and within-subject variation), the standard deviation of individual responses (SDR) was computed and compared with the minimally clinically important difference (MCID) for appendicular lean mass (ALM), leg strength, timed up-and-go (TUG), and serum triacylglycerol (TG) concentration. Clinically meaningful interindividual variability in response to supplementation was deemed to be present when the SDR positively exceeded the MCID. The probability that individual responses were clinically meaningful, and the phenotypic, dietary, and behavioural determinants of response to supplementation were examined. Results The SDR was below the MCID for ALM (LEU-PRO: -0.12 kg [90% CI: -0.38, 0.35], LEU-PRO+n-3: -0.32 kg [-0.45, 0.03], MCID: 0.21 kg), TUG (LEU-PRO: 0.58 s [0.18, 0.80], LEU-PRO+n-3: 0.73 s [0.41, 0.95], MCID: 0.9 s) and TG (LEU-PRO: -0.38 mmol/L [-0.80, 0.25], LEU-PRO+n-3: -0.44 mmol/L [-0.63, 0.06], MCID: 0.1 mmol/L), indicating no meaningful interindividual variability in response to either supplement. The SDR exceeded the MCID (19 Nm) for strength in response to LEU-PRO (25 Nm [-29, 45]) and LEU-PRO+n-3 (23 Nm [-29, 43]) supplementation but the effect was uncertain, evidenced by wide confidence intervals. In the next stage of analysis, similar proportions of participant responses were identified as very likely, likely, possibly, unlikely, and very unlikely to represent clinically meaningful improvements across the LEU-PRO, LEU-PRO+n-3, and CON groups (P > 0.05). Baseline LC n-3 PUFA status, habitual protein intake, and numerous other phenotypic and behavioural factors were not determinants of response to LEU-PRO or LEU-PRO+n-3 supplementation. Conclusions Applying a novel, robust methodological approach to precision nutrition, we show that there was minimal interindividual variability in changes in ALM, muscle function, and TG in response to LEU-PRO and LEU-PRO+n-3 supplementation in older adults at risk of sarcopenia.
引用
收藏
页码:872 / 883
页数:12
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [41] Fish oil supplementation and risk of ventricular tachycardia and ventricular fibrillation in patients with implantable defibrillators - A randomized controlled trial
    Raitt, MH
    Connor, WE
    Morris, C
    Kron, J
    Halperin, B
    Chugh, SS
    McClelland, J
    Cook, J
    MacMurdy, K
    Swenson, R
    Connor, SL
    Gerhard, G
    Kraemer, DF
    Oscran, D
    Marchant, C
    Calhoun, D
    Shnider, R
    McAnulty, J
    JAMA-JOURNAL OF THE AMERICAN MEDICAL ASSOCIATION, 2005, 293 (23): : 2884 - 2891
  • [42] Prenatal Fish Oil Supplementation and Allergy: 6-Year Follow-up of a Randomized Controlled Trial
    Best, Karen P.
    Sullivan, Thomas
    Palmer, Debra
    Gold, Michael
    Kennedy, Declan
    Martin, James
    Makrides, Maria
    PEDIATRICS, 2016, 137 (06)
  • [43] EFFECT OF FISH OIL SUPPLEMENTATION ON BLOOD-PRESSURE - A DOUBLE-BLIND RANDOMIZED CONTROLLED CROSSOVER TRIAL
    WILT, TJ
    LOFGREN, RP
    NICHOL, KN
    ECKFELDT, J
    CLINICAL RESEARCH, 1989, 37 (02): : A784 - A784
  • [44] Randomized Controlled Trial of Calcium Supplementation in Healthy, Nonosteoporotic, Older Men
    Reid, Ian R.
    Ames, Ruth
    Mason, Barbara
    Reid, Helen E.
    Bacon, Catherine J.
    Bolland, Mark J.
    Gamble, Gregory D.
    Grey, Andrew
    Horne, Anne
    ARCHIVES OF INTERNAL MEDICINE, 2008, 168 (20) : 2276 - 2282
  • [45] Randomized Controlled Trial of Exercise and Nutrition Supplementation on Physical and Cognitive Function in Older Chinese Adults Aged 50 Years and Older
    Woo, Jean
    Chan, Ruth
    Ong, Sherlin
    Bragt, Marjolijn
    Bos, Rolf
    Parikh, Panam
    de Groot, Lisette C. P. G. M.
    JOURNAL OF THE AMERICAN MEDICAL DIRECTORS ASSOCIATION, 2020, 21 (03) : 395 - 403
  • [46] A randomized controlled trial of mailed osteoporosis education to older adults
    Solomon, DH
    Finkelstein, JS
    Polinski, JM
    Arnold, M
    Licari, A
    Cabral, D
    Canning, C
    Avorn, J
    Katz, JN
    OSTEOPOROSIS INTERNATIONAL, 2006, 17 (05) : 760 - 767
  • [47] RANDOMIZED CONTROLLED TRIAL OF LAYDELIVERED INTERVENTION FOR DEPRESSED OLDER ADULTS
    Gum, Amber
    Conner, Kyaien
    Crawford, Nicole
    Raue, Patrick
    Sirey, Jo Anne
    INNOVATION IN AGING, 2023, 7 : 406 - 406
  • [48] Mood and Influenza Vaccination in Older Adults: A Randomized Controlled Trial
    Ayling, Kieran
    Fairclough, Lucy
    Buchanan, Heather
    Wetherell, Mark A.
    Vedhara, Kavita
    HEALTH PSYCHOLOGY, 2019, 38 (11) : 984 - 996
  • [49] A randomized controlled trial of mailed osteoporosis education to older adults
    D. H. Solomon
    J. S. Finkelstein
    J. M. Polinski
    M. Arnold
    A. Licari
    D. Cabral
    C. Canning
    J. Avorn
    J. N. Katz
    Osteoporosis International, 2006, 17 : 760 - 767
  • [50] A Randomized Controlled Trial of an Automated Exercise Coach for Older Adults
    Bickmore, Timothy W.
    Silliman, Rebecca A.
    Nelson, Kerrie
    Cheng, Debbie M.
    Winter, Michael
    Henault, Lori
    Paasche-Orlow, Michael K.
    JOURNAL OF THE AMERICAN GERIATRICS SOCIETY, 2013, 61 (10) : 1676 - 1683