Survival Analysis and Interpretation of Time-to-Event Data: The Tortoise and the Hare

被引:145
|
作者
Schober, Patrick [1 ]
Vetter, Thomas R. [2 ]
机构
[1] Vrije Univ Amsterdam, Med Ctr, Dept Anesthesiol, Boelelaan 1117, NL-1081 HV Amsterdam, Netherlands
[2] Univ Texas Austin, Dell Med Sch, Dept Surg & Perioperat Care, Austin, TX 78712 USA
来源
ANESTHESIA AND ANALGESIA | 2018年 / 127卷 / 03期
关键词
MULTIVARIATE DATA-ANALYSIS; SURGERY; TUTORIAL; MODELS; OXYGEN;
D O I
10.1213/ANE.0000000000003653
中图分类号
R614 [麻醉学];
学科分类号
100217 ;
摘要
Survival analysis, or more generally, time-to-event analysis, refers to a set of methods for analyzing the length of time until the occurrence of a well-defined end point of interest. A unique feature of survival data is that typically not all patients experience the event (eg, death) by the end of the observation period, so the actual survival times for some patients are unknown. This phenomenon, referred to as censoring, must be accounted for in the analysis to allow for valid inferences. Moreover, survival times are usually skewed, limiting the usefulness of analysis methods that assume a normal data distribution. As part of the ongoing series in Anesthesia & Analgesia, this tutorial reviews statistical methods for the appropriate analysis of time-to-event data, including nonparametric and semiparametric methods-specifically the Kaplan-Meier estimator, log-rank test, and Cox proportional hazards model. These methods are by far the most commonly used techniques for such data in medical literature. Illustrative examples from studies published in Anesthesia & Analgesia demonstrate how these techniques are used in practice. Full parametric models and models to deal with special circumstances, such as recurrent events models, competing risks models, and frailty models, are briefly discussed.
引用
收藏
页码:792 / 798
页数:7
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [21] Competing risks analysis for discrete time-to-event data
    Schmid, Matthias
    Berger, Moritz
    [J]. WILEY INTERDISCIPLINARY REVIEWS-COMPUTATIONAL STATISTICS, 2021, 13 (05)
  • [22] Sensitivity Analysis for Withdrawals in Grouped Time-to-Event Data
    Zhao, Yue
    Preisser, John S.
    Koch, Gary G.
    [J]. STATISTICS IN BIOPHARMACEUTICAL RESEARCH, 2014, 6 (01): : 41 - 54
  • [23] Bayesian Approach for Joint Longitudinal and Time-to-Event Data with Survival Fraction
    Abu Bakar, Mohd Rizam
    Salah, Khalid A.
    Ibrahim, Noor Akma
    Haron, Kassim
    [J]. BULLETIN OF THE MALAYSIAN MATHEMATICAL SCIENCES SOCIETY, 2009, 32 (01) : 75 - 100
  • [24] Network estimation for censored time-to-event data for multiple events based on multivariate survival analysis
    Kim, Yoojoong
    Seok, Junhee
    [J]. PLOS ONE, 2020, 15 (10):
  • [25] Time-to-event analyses of ecotoxicity data
    Newman, MC
    McCloskey, JT
    [J]. ECOTOXICOLOGY, 1996, 5 (03) : 187 - 196
  • [26] Modeling Discrete Time-to-Event Data
    Beyersmann, Jan
    [J]. BIOMETRICS, 2018, 74 (01) : 378 - 379
  • [27] Modeling Discrete Time-to-Event Data
    Bringe, Arnaud
    [J]. POPULATION, 2018, 73 (02): : 406 - 407
  • [28] Cure Models for the Analysis of Time-to-Event Data in Cancer Studies
    Jia, Xiaoyu
    Sima, Camelia S.
    Brennan, Murray F.
    Panageas, Katherine S.
    [J]. JOURNAL OF SURGICAL ONCOLOGY, 2013, 108 (06) : 342 - 347
  • [29] Statistical issues in the analysis of adverse events in time-to-event data
    Allignol, Arthur
    Beyersmann, Jan
    Schmoor, Claudia
    [J]. PHARMACEUTICAL STATISTICS, 2016, 15 (04) : 297 - 305
  • [30] Competing risks analysis of time-to-event data for cardiovascular surgeons
    Staffa, Steven J.
    Zurakowski, David
    [J]. JOURNAL OF THORACIC AND CARDIOVASCULAR SURGERY, 2020, 159 (06): : 2459 - +