Do Community Health Worker Interventions Improve Rates of Screening Mammography in the United States? A Systematic Review

被引:112
|
作者
Wells, Kristen J. [1 ,2 ]
Luque, John S. [2 ,3 ]
Miladinovic, Branko [1 ]
Vargas, Natalia [2 ]
Asvat, Yasmin [1 ,2 ]
Roetzheim, Richard G. [1 ,2 ]
Kumar, Ambuj [1 ,2 ]
机构
[1] Univ S Florida, Tampa, FL 33612 USA
[2] Univ S Florida, H Lee Moffitt Canc Ctr, Tampa, FL 33682 USA
[3] Georgia So Univ, Statesboro, GA 30460 USA
关键词
CLUSTER RANDOMIZED-TRIALS; AFRICAN-AMERICAN WOMEN; BREAST-CANCER; PROMOTE MAMMOGRAPHY; DISPARITIES; INCOME; IMPACT; RACE; CARE; POPULATION;
D O I
10.1158/1055-9965.EPI-11-0276
中图分类号
R73 [肿瘤学];
学科分类号
100214 ;
摘要
Background: Community health workers (CHW) are lay individuals who are trained to serve as liaisons between members of their communities and health care providers and services. Methods: A systematic review was conducted to synthesize evidence from all prospective controlled studies on effectiveness of CHW programs in improving screening mammography rates. Studies reported in English and conducted in the United States were included if they: (i) evaluated a CHW intervention designed to increase screening mammography rates in women 40 years of age or older without a history of breast cancer; (ii) were a randomized controlled trial (RCT), case-controlled study, or quasi-experimental study; and (iii) evaluated a CHW intervention outside of a hospital setting. Results: Participation in a CHW intervention was associated with a statistically significant increase in receipt of screening mammography [risk ratio (RR): 1.06 (favoring intervention); 95% CI: 1.02-1.11, P = 0.003]. The effect remained when pooled data from only RCTs were included in meta-analysis (RR: 1.07; 95% CI: 1.03-1.12, P = 0.0005) but was not present using pooled data from only quasi-experimental studies (RR: 1.03; 95% CI: 0.89-1.18, P = 0.71). In RCTs, participants recruited from medical settings (RR: 1.41; 95% CI: 1.09-1.82, P = 0.008), programs conducted in urban settings (RR: 1.23; 95% CI: 1.09, 1.39, P = 0.001), and programs where CHWs were matched to intervention participants on race or ethnicity (RR: 1.58, 95% CI: 1.29-1.93, P = 0.0001) showed stronger effects on increasing mammography screening rates. Conclusions: CHW interventions are effective for increasing screening mammography in certain settings and populations. Impact: CHW interventions are especially associated with improvements in rate of screening mammography in medical settings, urban settings, and in participants who are racially or ethnically concordant with the CHW. Cancer Epidemiol Biomarkers Prev; 20(8); 1580-98. (C)2011 AACR.
引用
收藏
页码:1580 / 1598
页数:19
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [21] Evaluation of Interventions Intended to Increase Colorectal Cancer Screening Rates in the United States A Systematic Review and Meta-analysis
    Dougherty, Michael K.
    Brenner, Alison T.
    Crockett, Seth D.
    Gupta, Shivani
    Wheeler, Stephanie B.
    Coker-Schwimmer, Manny
    Cubillos, Laura
    Malo, Teri
    Reuland, Daniel S.
    [J]. JAMA INTERNAL MEDICINE, 2018, 178 (12) : 1645 - 1658
  • [22] Sexual Health Interventions for Black Women in the United States: a Systematic Review of Literature
    Ware, Samuella
    Thorpe, Shemeka
    Tanner, Amanda E.
    [J]. INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF SEXUAL HEALTH, 2019, 31 (02) : 196 - 215
  • [23] Interventions to Increase Mammography Rates Among US Latinas: A Systematic Review
    Corcoran, Jacqueline
    Dattalo, Patrick
    Crowley, Meghan
    [J]. JOURNAL OF WOMENS HEALTH, 2010, 19 (07) : 1281 - 1288
  • [24] Interventions to improve the health of the homeless - A systematic review
    Hwang, SW
    Tolomiczenko, G
    Kouyoumdjian, FG
    Garner, RE
    [J]. AMERICAN JOURNAL OF PREVENTIVE MEDICINE, 2005, 29 (04) : 311 - 319
  • [25] Effects of Community-Based Health Worker Interventions to Improve Chronic Disease Management and Care Among Vulnerable Populations: A Systematic Review
    Kim, Kyounghae
    Choi, Janet S.
    Choi, Eunsuk
    Nieman, Carrie L.
    Joo, Jin Hui
    Lin, Frank R.
    Gitlin, Laura N.
    Han, Hae-Ra
    [J]. AMERICAN JOURNAL OF PUBLIC HEALTH, 2016, 106 (04) : E3 - E28
  • [26] Who is a community health worker? - a systematic review of definitions
    Olaniran, Abimbola
    Smith, Helen
    Unkels, Regine
    Bar-Zeev, Sarah
    van den Broek, Nynke
    [J]. GLOBAL HEALTH ACTION, 2017, 10
  • [27] Community Pharmacist-Led Interventions to Improve Preconception and Pregnancy Health: A Systematic Review
    Scott, Polly A.
    Quotah, Ola F.
    Dalrymple, Kathryn V.
    White, Sara L.
    Poston, Lucilla
    Farebrother, Jessica
    Lakhani, Shivali
    Alter, Marsha
    Blair, Mitch
    Weinman, John
    Flynn, Angela C.
    [J]. PHARMACY, 2021, 9 (04)
  • [28] Screening tools to address social determinants of health in the United States: A systematic review
    Neshan, Mahdi
    Padmanaban, Vennila
    Tsilimigras, Diamantis I.
    Obeng-Gyasi, Samilia
    Fareed, Naleef
    Pawlik, Timothy M.
    [J]. JOURNAL OF CLINICAL AND TRANSLATIONAL SCIENCE, 2024, 8 (01)
  • [29] UNDERUTILIZATION OF IMPLANTABLE CARDIOVERTER DEFIBRILLATORS IN THE UNITED STATES: A SYSTEMATIC REVIEW OF RATES, RISK FACTORS, AND INTERVENTIONS
    Habib, Ashkan
    Hardison, Rachel
    Chang, Albert
    Day, Gabriella
    Simpson, Ross J., Jr.
    [J]. JOURNAL OF THE AMERICAN COLLEGE OF CARDIOLOGY, 2024, 83 (13) : 95 - 95
  • [30] Associations of County-level Radiologist and Mammography Facility Supply with Screening Mammography Rates in the United States
    Rosenkrantz, Andrew B.
    Moy, Linda
    Fleming, Margaret M.
    Duszak, Richard, Jr.
    [J]. ACADEMIC RADIOLOGY, 2018, 25 (07) : 883 - 888