Do Community Health Worker Interventions Improve Rates of Screening Mammography in the United States? A Systematic Review

被引:112
|
作者
Wells, Kristen J. [1 ,2 ]
Luque, John S. [2 ,3 ]
Miladinovic, Branko [1 ]
Vargas, Natalia [2 ]
Asvat, Yasmin [1 ,2 ]
Roetzheim, Richard G. [1 ,2 ]
Kumar, Ambuj [1 ,2 ]
机构
[1] Univ S Florida, Tampa, FL 33612 USA
[2] Univ S Florida, H Lee Moffitt Canc Ctr, Tampa, FL 33682 USA
[3] Georgia So Univ, Statesboro, GA 30460 USA
关键词
CLUSTER RANDOMIZED-TRIALS; AFRICAN-AMERICAN WOMEN; BREAST-CANCER; PROMOTE MAMMOGRAPHY; DISPARITIES; INCOME; IMPACT; RACE; CARE; POPULATION;
D O I
10.1158/1055-9965.EPI-11-0276
中图分类号
R73 [肿瘤学];
学科分类号
100214 ;
摘要
Background: Community health workers (CHW) are lay individuals who are trained to serve as liaisons between members of their communities and health care providers and services. Methods: A systematic review was conducted to synthesize evidence from all prospective controlled studies on effectiveness of CHW programs in improving screening mammography rates. Studies reported in English and conducted in the United States were included if they: (i) evaluated a CHW intervention designed to increase screening mammography rates in women 40 years of age or older without a history of breast cancer; (ii) were a randomized controlled trial (RCT), case-controlled study, or quasi-experimental study; and (iii) evaluated a CHW intervention outside of a hospital setting. Results: Participation in a CHW intervention was associated with a statistically significant increase in receipt of screening mammography [risk ratio (RR): 1.06 (favoring intervention); 95% CI: 1.02-1.11, P = 0.003]. The effect remained when pooled data from only RCTs were included in meta-analysis (RR: 1.07; 95% CI: 1.03-1.12, P = 0.0005) but was not present using pooled data from only quasi-experimental studies (RR: 1.03; 95% CI: 0.89-1.18, P = 0.71). In RCTs, participants recruited from medical settings (RR: 1.41; 95% CI: 1.09-1.82, P = 0.008), programs conducted in urban settings (RR: 1.23; 95% CI: 1.09, 1.39, P = 0.001), and programs where CHWs were matched to intervention participants on race or ethnicity (RR: 1.58, 95% CI: 1.29-1.93, P = 0.0001) showed stronger effects on increasing mammography screening rates. Conclusions: CHW interventions are effective for increasing screening mammography in certain settings and populations. Impact: CHW interventions are especially associated with improvements in rate of screening mammography in medical settings, urban settings, and in participants who are racially or ethnically concordant with the CHW. Cancer Epidemiol Biomarkers Prev; 20(8); 1580-98. (C)2011 AACR.
引用
收藏
页码:1580 / 1598
页数:19
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [1] Systematic Review of Mammography Screening Educational Interventions for Hispanic Women in the United States
    Luque, John S.
    Logan, Ayaba
    Soulen, Grace
    Armeson, Kent E.
    Garrett, Danielle M.
    Davila, Caroline B.
    Ford, Marvella E.
    [J]. JOURNAL OF CANCER EDUCATION, 2019, 34 (03) : 412 - 422
  • [2] Systematic Review of Mammography Screening Educational Interventions for Hispanic Women in the United States
    John S. Luque
    Ayaba Logan
    Grace Soulen
    Kent E. Armeson
    Danielle M. Garrett
    Caroline B. Davila
    Marvella E. Ford
    [J]. Journal of Cancer Education, 2019, 34 : 412 - 422
  • [3] Interventions to Improve Health Among Refugees in the United States: A Systematic Review
    Bitterfeld, Leandra
    Ozkaynak, Mustafa
    Denton, Andrea H.
    Normeshie, Cornelius A.
    Valdez, Rupa S.
    Sharif, Noor
    Caldwell, Priscilla A.
    Hauck, Fern R.
    [J]. JOURNAL OF COMMUNITY HEALTH, 2024,
  • [4] Mental Health Interventions with Community Health Workers in the United States: A Systematic Review
    Weaver, Addie
    Lapidos, Adrienne
    [J]. JOURNAL OF HEALTH CARE FOR THE POOR AND UNDERSERVED, 2018, 29 (01) : 159 - 180
  • [5] Outcomes and Costs of Community Health Worker Interventions A Systematic Review
    Viswanathan, Meera
    Kraschnewski, Jennifer L.
    Nishikawa, Brett
    Morgan, Laura C.
    Honeycutt, Amanda A.
    Thieda, Patricia
    Lohr, Kathleen N.
    Jonas, Daniel E.
    [J]. MEDICAL CARE, 2010, 48 (09) : 792 - 808
  • [6] A systematic review of rural community-based mental health interventions in the United States
    Mengell, Kirsten A.
    Chikawa, Muchaneta M. N.
    Weinstein, Jenna N.
    Welch, RoShonda
    Smallwood, Stacy W.
    Hansen, Andrew R.
    [J]. JOURNAL OF MENTAL HEALTH, 2024,
  • [7] A Scoping Review of the Community Health Worker Model Used for Food Systems Interventions Within the United States
    DeNunzio, Maria
    Miller, Makenzie
    Chase, Melissa
    Kraak, Vivica
    Serrano, Elena
    Misyak, Sarah
    [J]. AMERICAN JOURNAL OF HEALTH PROMOTION, 2023, 37 (03) : 401 - 419
  • [8] Social capital and screening mammography rates in the United States
    Huang, Tracy
    Ekenga, Christine
    [J]. CANCER RESEARCH, 2024, 84 (06)
  • [9] Community Health Worker Interventions to Improve Glycemic Control in People with Diabetes: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis
    Palmas, Walter
    March, Dana
    Darakjy, Salima
    Findley, Sally E.
    Teresi, Jeanne
    Carrasquillo, Olveen
    Luchsinger, Jose A.
    [J]. JOURNAL OF GENERAL INTERNAL MEDICINE, 2015, 30 (07) : 1004 - 1012
  • [10] Community Health Worker Interventions to Improve Glycemic Control in People with Diabetes: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis
    Walter Palmas
    Dana March
    Salima Darakjy
    Sally E. Findley
    Jeanne Teresi
    Olveen Carrasquillo
    José A. Luchsinger
    [J]. Journal of General Internal Medicine, 2015, 30 : 1004 - 1012