A comparative evaluation of antimicrobial efficacy and flow properties for Epiphany, Guttaflow and AH-Plus sealer

P>Aim To test the antimicrobial efficacy and flow properties of Guttaflow, Epiphany sealer and AH-Plus sealer. Methodology With the use of Enterococcus faecalis ATCC 29212 as a test organism, both the agar diffusion test (ADT) and direct contact test (DCT) were performed. For DCT, sealers were mixed and placed over the bottom of sterile screw-capped test tubes. A 50 mu L bacterial suspension was placed on the tested material samples. Bacteria were allowed to directly come in contact with the sealers for 1 h at 37 degrees C in one group and for 24 h in the other group. The suspensions were then diluted and inoculated over blood agar plates, and bacterial colony counts were determined with the use of a digital colony counter. The data in both 1- and24-h groups were individually analysed using repeated measures ANOVA. Kruskal Wallis tests were further used to obtain comparison between 1- and 24-h results for all three sealers. In the flow assay, the sealers were placed between two glass slides, and a weight of 500 g was placed on the top of the glass. The diameters of the formed discs were recorded. Results For both the ADT and DCT tests, Epiphany and AH-Plus sealer reduced the bacterial counts significantly (P = 0.000). Epiphany produced a greater reduction in bacterial counts when compared to AH-Plus in both the tests (P = 0.000). Guttaflow paste failed to show any antibacterial activity in both ADT & DCT. According to the flow test, all root canal sealers flowed; Epiphany sealer had the maximum flow under the given conditions, followed by AH-Plus sealer and Guttaflow paste. Conclusions Antimicrobial activity of the sealers was greatest for Epiphany followed by AH-Plus sealer and Guttaflow. Epiphany sealer had the maximum flow followed by AH-Plus sealer and Guttaflow.