Geochemical evidence for reworking of the juvenile crust in the Neoarchean for felsic magmatism in the Yunzhongshan area, the North China Craton

被引:6
|
作者
Wang, Xi [1 ,2 ]
Zheng, Yong-Fei [3 ]
Zhu, Wen-Bin [4 ]
机构
[1] China Univ Petr East China, China Univ Petr, Sch Geosci, Key Lab Deep Oil & Gas Geol & Geophys, Qingdao 266580, Shandong, Peoples R China
[2] Qingdao Natl Lab Marine Sci & Technol, Lab Marine Mineral Resources, Qingdao 266071, Shandong, Peoples R China
[3] Univ Sci & Technol China, Sch Earth & Space Sci, CAS Key Lab Crust Mantle Mat & Environm, Hefei 230026, Anhui, Peoples R China
[4] Nanjing Univ, State Key Lab Mineral Deposits Res, Sch Earth Sci & Engn, Nanjing 210093, Jiangsu, Peoples R China
基金
中国国家自然科学基金;
关键词
TTG gneisses; Felsic volcanics; high-K granite; Neoarchean; Arc magmatism; Crustal reworking; North China Craton; ZIRCON U-PB; GRANITE-GREENSTONE BELT; LIAO-JI BELT; TRONDHJEMITE-GRANODIORITE TTG; PRESSURE PELITIC GRANULITES; EARLY CONTINENTAL-CRUST; HF ISOTOPE COMPOSITION; LUSHAN-TAIHUA COMPLEX; CENTRAL OROGENIC BELT; LULIANG COMPLEX;
D O I
10.1016/j.precamres.2019.105493
中图分类号
P [天文学、地球科学];
学科分类号
07 ;
摘要
The North China Craton experienced two phases of tectonothermal events at ca. 2.8-2.7 Ga and ca. 2.6-2.5 Ga, respectively. Although 2.6-2.5 Ga granitic gneisses and metavolcano-sedimentary sequences are widespread in the craton, the major stage of crustal growth has been determined to occur at 2.8-2.7 Ga in terms of whole-rock Sm-Nd and zircon Lu-Hf isotope studies. It has been intriguing how the vast 2.8-2.7 Ga juvenile mafic crust would have differentiated into the 2.6-2.5 Ga felsic crust. This issue is addressed in the present study by investigating zircon U-Pb ages and Lu-Hf isotopes as well as whole-rock major-trace elements and Sm-Nd isotopes in Neoarchean felsic igneous rocks from the Yunzhongshan area in the central part of the North China Craton. Zircon U-Pb dating of felsic volcanics, TTG gneisses and high-K granites yields three groups of crystallization ages at 2562-2508 Ma, 2537-2504 Ma and 2518-2508 Ma, respectively, consistent with ages for mafic volcanics in the target area. Zircon Lu-Hf and whole-rock Sm-Nd isotope data indicate that all these rocks were ultimately originated from the ca. 2.8-2.7 Ga juvenile mafic crust. The felsic volcanics are subdivided into low-Si and highSi suites. The low-Si rocks have higher MgO and FeO contents and contain abundant 2.8-2.7 Ga relict zircons with an age peak of similar to 2.72 Ga, and were produced by partial melting of similar to 2.72 Ga TTG at similar to 730 to 750 degrees C. The high-Si volcanics were derived from partial melting of mafic restites after extraction of the similar to 2.72 Ga TTG, with significant amounts of garnet and amphibole, but no or rare plagioclase as residual phases, corresponding to a melting pressure at similar to 15 kbar. The TTG gneisses were produced by partial melting of similar to 2.8 to 2.7 Ga garnet amphibolites at similar to 10 to 15 kbar with variable amounts of garnet, amphibole and plagioclase in the residue. The high-K granites were produced by partial melting of similar to 2.8 to 2.7 Ga medium-high K mafic rocks at pressures of < 10 to 12 kbar with a considerable amount of plagioclase in the residue. The TTG rocks and high-Si volcanics require a subduction origin to account for their enrichment in LILE, so that they were mostly likely derived from partial melting of the older arc crust with moderate enrichment in LILE and LREE. By contrast, the ultimate sources of the high-K granites would be the similar to 2.8 to 2.7 Ga medium-high K basalts, which have lower Zr/Sm ratios than the TTG gneisses and felsic volcanics, and even lower than the bulk continental crust, but consistent with modern island arc basalts. It is possible that the 2.8-2.7 Ga magmatism was subduction-related, with a compositional change of the mafic arc crust from relatively sodic to more potassic at around 2.7 Ga. This may be caused by accretion of the ancient oceanic arc onto the ancient continental margin. It was followed by both growth of the juvenile crust and reworking of the older arc crust in the late Neoarchean. Such series of magmatic processes can account for the voluminous generation of the 2.56-2.50 Ga felsic and mafic igneous rocks in the central part of the North China Craton. Taken together, both growth and reworking of the juvenile crust were realized through accretionary and rifting orogeneses, marking the operation of plate tectonics in the Neoarchean.
引用
收藏
页数:24
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [41] Late Neoarchean to Paleoproterozoic arc magmatism in the Shandong Peninsula, North China Craton and its tectonic implications
    Yang, Fan
    Santosh, M.
    Kim, Sung Won
    Zhou, Hongying
    PRECAMBRIAN RESEARCH, 2021, 358
  • [42] Ultrahigh-temperature metamorphism of the felsic granulites in the eastern North China Craton and their implications on the Neoarchean tectonic regime
    Guo, Minjie
    Zhang, Jian
    Qian, Jiahui
    Yin, Changqing
    Gao, Peng
    Hsia, Juiyen
    Zhang, Shuhui
    Yu, Chenying
    LITHOS, 2024, 468
  • [43] Origin of the Mesozoic magmatism in the North China Craton: constraints from petrological and geochemical data
    Chen, B.
    Zhai, M. -G.
    Tian, W.
    MESOZOIC SUB-CONTINENTAL LITHOSPHERIC THINNING UNDER EASTERN ASIA, 2007, 280 : 131 - +
  • [44] Zircon Lu-Hf isotopes and granite geochemistry of the Murchison Domain of the Yilgarn Craton: Evidence for reworking of Eoarchean crust during Meso-Neoarchean plume-driven magmatism
    Ivanic, Timothy J.
    Van Kranendonk, Martin J.
    Kirkland, Christopher L.
    Wyche, Stephen
    Wingate, Michael T. D.
    Belousova, Elena A.
    LITHOS, 2012, 148 : 112 - 127
  • [45] Diverse middle Neoarchean granitoids and the delamination of thickened crust in the Western Shandong Terrane, North China Craton
    Hu, Yalu
    Liu, Shuwen
    Gao, Lei
    Sun, Guozheng
    Guo, Rongrong
    Fu, Jinghao
    Wang, Maojiang
    Hu, Fangyang
    LITHOS, 2019, 348
  • [46] Neoarchean reworking of TTG-like crust in the southernmost portion of the Sao Francisco Craton: U-Pb zircon dating and geochemical evidence from the Sao Tiago Batholith
    Simon, Mauricio Bulhoes
    Bongiolo, Everton Marques
    Avila, Ciro Alexandre
    Oliveira, Elson Paiva
    Teixeira, Wilson
    Stohler, Romulo Campos
    Soares de Oliveira, Filipe Vidal
    PRECAMBRIAN RESEARCH, 2018, 314 : 353 - 376
  • [47] Crustal growth and reworking of the eastern North China Craton: Constraints from the age and geochemistry of the Neoarchean Taishan TTG gneisses
    Chen, Ying
    Zhang, Jian
    Liu, Jin
    Han, Yigui
    Yin, Changqing
    Qian, Jiahui
    Liu, Xiaoguang
    PRECAMBRIAN RESEARCH, 2020, 343
  • [48] Reworking of Eoarchean to Mesoarchean Continental Crust in the Anshan-Benxi Area, North China Craton-Evidence from Lianshanguan ca. 2.5 Ga Syenogranites
    Zhang, Wen
    Wang, Wei
    Du, Lilin
    Liu, Pinghua
    Xu, Wang
    MINERALS, 2024, 14 (01)
  • [49] Geochemical constraints on the origin of Neoarchean magmatic rocks in the Luliang Complex, North China Craton: Tectonic implications
    Wang, Xi
    Zheng, Yong-Fei
    Zhu, Wen-Bin
    PRECAMBRIAN RESEARCH, 2019, 327 : 212 - 231
  • [50] Reworking of juvenile crust: Element and isotope evidence from Neoproterozoic granodiorite in South China
    Wu, Rong-Xin
    Zheng, Yong-Fei
    Wu, Yuan-Bao
    Zhao, Zi-Fu
    Zhang, Shao-Bing
    Liu, Xiaoming
    Wu, Fu-Yuan
    PRECAMBRIAN RESEARCH, 2006, 146 (3-4) : 179 - 212