The effects of CenteringPregnancy group prenatal care on postpartum visit attendance and contraception use

被引:15
|
作者
Heberlein, Emily [1 ]
Smith, Jessica [1 ]
Willis, Carla [1 ,3 ]
Hall, Wendasha [1 ]
Covington-Kolb, Sarah [2 ]
Crockett, Amy [2 ]
机构
[1] Georgia State Univ, Georgia Hlth Policy Ctr, 55 Pk Pl NE, Atlanta, GA 30303 USA
[2] Prisma Hlth, 890 W Faris Rd,Suite 420, Greenville, SC 29605 USA
[3] Georgia Dept Community Hlth, 2 Peachtree St NW, Atlanta, GA 30303 USA
关键词
Group prenatal care; CenteringPregnancy; Postpartum visits; Postpartum contraception choice; CESAREAN-SECTION; PREGNANCY; WOMEN; OUTCOMES; HEALTH; ADOLESCENTS; PREDICTORS; TRENDS; MODEL;
D O I
10.1016/j.contraception.2020.02.010
中图分类号
R71 [妇产科学];
学科分类号
100211 ;
摘要
Objective: We examined whether Medicaid-enrolled women in CenteringPregnancy group prenatal care had higher rates of (1) postpartum visit attendance and (2) postpartum uptake of contraceptives, compared to women in individual prenatal care. Study design: We linked birth certificates and Medicaid claims for women receiving group prenatal care in 18 healthcare practices and applied preferential-within cluster propensity score methods to identify a comparison group, accounting for the nested data structure by practice. We examined five standardized, claims-based outcomes: postpartum visit attendance; contraception within 3 days; and any contraception, long-acting reversible contraception (LARC), and permanent contraception within eight weeks. We assessed outcomes using logistic regression for two treatment levels: (1) any group attendance compared to no group attendance and (2) attendance at five or more group sessions to at least five prenatal care visits, including crossovers attending fewer than five group sessions (minimum threshold analysis). Results: Women attending at least five group sessions had higher rates of postpartum visit attendance (71.5% vs. 67.5%, p < .05). Women with any group attendance (N = 2834) were more likely than women with individual care only (N = 13,088) to receive contraception within 3 days (19.8% vs. 16.9%, p < .001) and to receive a LARC within eight weeks' postpartum (18.0% vs. 15.2%, p < .001). At both treatment levels, group participants were less likely to elect permanent contraception (5.9% vs. 7.8%, p < 0.001). Women meeting the five-visit group threshold were not more likely to initiate contraception or LARCs within 8 weeks' postpartum. Conclusion: Participation in at least five group compared to five individual prenatal care visits is associated with greater rates of postpartum visit attendance. Additional engagement and education in group prenatal care may influence postpartum visit attendance. (C) 2020 Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.
引用
收藏
页码:46 / 51
页数:6
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [31] Group Prenatal Care Attendance: Determinants and Relationship with Care Satisfaction
    Shayna D. Cunningham
    Stephanie Grilo
    Jessica B. Lewis
    Gina Novick
    Sharon Schindler Rising
    Jonathan N. Tobin
    Jeannette R. Ickovics
    Maternal and Child Health Journal, 2017, 21 : 770 - 776
  • [32] Group Prenatal Care Attendance: Determinants and Relationship with Care Satisfaction
    Cunningham, Shayna D.
    Grilo, Stephanie
    Lewis, Jessica B.
    Novick, Gina
    Rising, Sharon Schindler
    Tobin, Jonathan N.
    Ickovics, Jeannette R.
    MATERNAL AND CHILD HEALTH JOURNAL, 2017, 21 (04) : 770 - 776
  • [33] Group Multimodal Prenatal Care and Postpartum Outcomes
    Avalos, Lyndsay A.
    Oberman, Nina
    Gomez, Lizeth
    Quesenberry, Charles P.
    Sinclair, Fiona
    Kurtovich, Elaine
    Gunderson, Erica P.
    Hedderson, Monique M.
    Stark, Joanna
    JAMA NETWORK OPEN, 2024, 7 (05) : E2412280
  • [34] Neighborhood Predictors of Poor Prenatal Care and Well-Child Visit Attendance
    Elizabeth R. Wolf
    Alicia Richards
    Roy T. Sabo
    Steven H. Woolf
    Bergen B. Nelson
    Alex H. Krist
    Maternal and Child Health Journal, 2024, 28 : 798 - 803
  • [35] Promoting improved social support and quality of life with the CenteringPregnancy® group model of prenatal care
    Chae, Sung Y.
    Chae, Mark H.
    Kandula, Sridevi
    Winter, Robin O.
    ARCHIVES OF WOMENS MENTAL HEALTH, 2017, 20 (01) : 209 - 220
  • [36] The impact of CenteringPregnancy group prenatal care on preterm birth in a low-income population
    Picklesimer, Amy
    Blackhurst, Dawn
    Covington-Kolb, Sarah
    Hale, Nathan
    Billings, Deborah
    AMERICAN JOURNAL OF OBSTETRICS AND GYNECOLOGY, 2012, 206 (01) : S55 - S56
  • [37] Neighborhood Predictors of Poor Prenatal Care and Well-Child Visit Attendance
    Wolf, Elizabeth R.
    Richards, Alicia
    Sabo, Roy T.
    Woolf, Steven H.
    Nelson, Bergen B.
    Krist, Alex H.
    MATERNAL AND CHILD HEALTH JOURNAL, 2024, 28 (05) : 798 - 803
  • [38] The effect of CenteringPregnancy group prenatal care on Gestational Diabetes Mellitus-Cradle study
    Chen, Yixin
    Crockett, Amy H.
    Zhang, Lu
    Britt, Jessica
    Sun, Xiaoqian
    Heo, Moonseong
    Chen, Liwei
    AMERICAN JOURNAL OF OBSTETRICS AND GYNECOLOGY, 2022, 226 (01) : S405 - S405
  • [39] Effects of Protocol Changes on Postpartum Visit Attendance Rates and Patient Care at a Student-run Free Clinic
    Rosenberger, Marie
    Fagan, Taylor
    Heil, Cate
    Calkins, John William
    OBSTETRICS AND GYNECOLOGY, 2019, 133 : 11S - 11S
  • [40] Variation in effectiveness of planned postpartum contraception at two time points from prenatal to postpartum care
    Bhide, Sayuli
    Ascha, Mustafa
    Wilkinson, Barbara
    Verbus, Emily
    Montague, Mary
    Morris, Jane
    Arora, Kavita Shah
    CONTRACEPTION, 2020, 102 (04) : 246 - 250