Retrospective comparative analysis of intraocular lens calculation formulas after hyperopic refractive surgery

被引:11
|
作者
Francone, Anibal [1 ,2 ]
Lemanski, Nicole [2 ]
Charles, Martin [1 ]
Borboli-Gerogiannis, Sheila [2 ]
Chen, Sherleen [2 ]
Robert, Marie-Claude [2 ]
Pineda, Roberto, II [2 ]
机构
[1] Ctr Oftalmol Dr Charles Soc Anonima, Buenos Aires, DF, Argentina
[2] Harvard Med Sch, Massachusetts Eye & Ear Infirm, Boston, MA 02115 USA
来源
PLOS ONE | 2019年 / 14卷 / 11期
关键词
IN-SITU KERATOMILEUSIS; POWER CALCULATION METHODS; EYES; CATARACT; MYOPIA; ASTIGMATISM; ACCURACY;
D O I
10.1371/journal.pone.0224981
中图分类号
O [数理科学和化学]; P [天文学、地球科学]; Q [生物科学]; N [自然科学总论];
学科分类号
07 ; 0710 ; 09 ;
摘要
Purpose To compare the intraocular lens calculation formulas and evaluate postoperative refractive results of patients with previous hyperopic corneal refractive surgery. Design Retrospective, comparative, observational study. Setting Massachusetts Eye and Ear Infirmary, Harvard Medical School, Boston, Massachusetts, USA. Methods Clinical charts and optical biometric data of 39 eyes from 24 consecutive patients diagnosed with previous hyperopic laser vision correction and cataract surgery were reviewed and analyzed. The Intraocular lens (IOL) power calculation using the Holladay 2 formula (Lenstar) and the American Society of Cataract and Refractive Surgery (ASCRS) Post-Refractive IOL Calculator (version 4.9, 2017) were compared to the actual manifest refractive spherical equivalent (MRSE) following cataract surgery. No pre-Lasik / PRK or post-Lasik / PRK information was used in any of the calculations. The IOL prediction error, the mean IOL prediction error, the median absolute refractive prediction error, and the percentages of eyes within +/- 0.50 diopter (D) and +/- 1.00 D of the predicted refraction were calculated. Results The Holladay 2 formula produced a mean arithmetic IOL prediction error significantly different from zero (P = 0.003). Surprisingly, the mean arithmetic IOL prediction errors generated by Shammas, Haigis-L and Barret True K No History formulas were not significantly different from zero (P = 0.14, P = 0.49, P = 0.81, respectively).There were no significant differences in the median absolute refractive prediction error or percentage of eyes within +/- 0.50 D or +/- 1.00 D of the predicted refraction between formulas or methods. Conclusion In eyes with previous hyperopic LASIK/PRK and no prior data, there were no significant differences in the accuracy of IOL power calculation between the Holladay 2 formula and the ASCRS Post-refractive IOL calculator.
引用
收藏
页数:10
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [41] Infections after Intraocular Lens Surgery: Implications for Refractive Surgery
    Taneri, S.
    Heiligenhaus, A.
    [J]. KLINISCHE MONATSBLATTER FUR AUGENHEILKUNDE, 2012, 229 (09) : 910 - 916
  • [42] Refractive lens exchange with spherical diffractive intraocular lens implantation after hyperopic laser in situ keratomileusis
    Alfonso, Jose F.
    Fernandez-Vega, Luis
    Baamonde, Begona
    Madrid-Costa, David
    Montes-Mico, Robert
    [J]. JOURNAL OF CATARACT AND REFRACTIVE SURGERY, 2009, 35 (10): : 1744 - 1750
  • [43] Contrast sensitivity after refractive lens exchange with diffractive multifocal intraocular lens implantation in hyperopic eyes
    Ferrer-Blasco, Teresa
    Montes-Mico, Robert
    Cervino, Alejandro
    Alfonso, Jose F.
    Fernandez-Vega, Luis
    [J]. JOURNAL OF CATARACT AND REFRACTIVE SURGERY, 2008, 34 (12): : 2043 - 2048
  • [44] Update on Intraocular Lens Calculation Formulas
    Melles, Ronald B.
    Kane, Jack X.
    Olsen, Thomas
    Chang, William J.
    [J]. OPHTHALMOLOGY, 2019, 126 (09) : 1334 - 1335
  • [45] Accuracy of Intraocular Lens Calculation Formulas
    Melles, Ronald B.
    Holladay, Jack T.
    Chang, William J.
    [J]. OPHTHALMOLOGY, 2018, 125 (02) : 169 - 178
  • [46] A comparative analysis of 12 intraocular lens power formulas
    Austin Pereira
    Marko M. Popovic
    Yusuf Ahmed
    John C. Lloyd
    Sherif El-Defrawy
    John Gorfinkel
    Matthew B. Schlenker
    [J]. International Ophthalmology, 2021, 41 : 4137 - 4150
  • [47] A COMPARATIVE-STUDY OF 8 INTRAOCULAR-LENS CALCULATION FORMULAS
    ASCASO, FJ
    CASTILLO, JM
    CRISTOBAL, JA
    MINGUEZ, E
    PALOMAR, A
    [J]. OPHTHALMOLOGICA, 1991, 203 (03) : 148 - 153
  • [48] A comparative analysis of 12 intraocular lens power formulas
    Pereira, Austin
    Popovic, Marko M.
    Ahmed, Yusuf
    Lloyd, John C.
    El-Defrawy, Sherif
    Gorfinkel, John
    Schlenker, Matthew B.
    [J]. INTERNATIONAL OPHTHALMOLOGY, 2021, 41 (12) : 4137 - 4150
  • [49] Comparison of intraocular lens power calculation methods after myopic laser refractive surgery without previous refractive surgery data
    Yang, Ruibo
    Yeh, Annie
    George, Michael R.
    Rahman, Maria
    Boerman, Helen
    Wang, Ming
    [J]. JOURNAL OF CATARACT AND REFRACTIVE SURGERY, 2013, 39 (09): : 1327 - 1335
  • [50] Refractive outcomes of phacoemulsification after pars plana vitrectomy using traditional and new intraocular lens calculation formulas
    Lamson, Thomas L.
    Song, Jane
    Abazari, Azin
    Weissbart, Sarah B.
    [J]. JOURNAL OF CATARACT AND REFRACTIVE SURGERY, 2019, 45 (03): : 293 - 297