Fertility Benefits at Top US Medical Schools

被引:1
|
作者
Hoang, Kim [1 ,2 ]
Evans, Neal [3 ]
Aghajanova, Lusine [2 ,4 ]
Talib, Hina [5 ]
Linos, Eleni [2 ,6 ]
Gold, Jessica M. [1 ,2 ]
机构
[1] Stanford Univ, Sch Med, Acad Med Ctr, Dept Pediat, Pediat Hosp Med MC 5660,453 Quarry Rd, Palo Alto, CA 94304 USA
[2] Stanford Univ, Sch Med, Palo Alto, CA 94304 USA
[3] Stanford Univ, Univ Human Resources, Palo Alto, CA 94304 USA
[4] Stanford Univ, Sch Med, Dept Obstet & Gynecol, Palo Alto, CA 94304 USA
[5] Albert Einstein Coll Med, Dept Pediat, Bronx, NY 10467 USA
[6] Stanford Univ, Sch Med, Dept Dermatol, Palo Alto, CA 94304 USA
关键词
infertility benefits; medical schools; physicians; INSURANCE; COVERAGE;
D O I
10.1089/jwh.2021.0486
中图分类号
R1 [预防医学、卫生学];
学科分类号
1004 ; 120402 ;
摘要
Background: Female physicians have a higher prevalence of infertility compared with the general population. Physician well-being can be significantly impacted by the physical and emotional challenges associated with this, including the high cost of fertility treatments, which are often not covered by health insurance. There are limited data on the current state of fertility coverage available for physicians. This study examines fertility insurance benefits offered for faculty at top U.S. medical schools.Methods: Between March and April 2021, we reviewed fertility benefits at medical schools ranked in the top 14 for research as identified by the US News & World Report 2021. The summary plan descriptions of benefits were collected from each institution's human resources (HR) website and direct phone call to HR representatives. We examined descriptions of coverage for fertility services including evaluation, treatments, medications, maximum lifetime coverage, and whether a formal diagnosis of infertility was required for benefit eligibility.Results: Fourteen institutions offer benefits for fertility evaluation and 13 offer benefits for treatment. Of the 13 institutions that offer treatment coverage, 11 cover in vitro fertilization, with 6 having limits on the number of cycles. Twelve offer medication coverage. Ten institutions specified maximum lifetime coverage for treatments and medications, ranging from $10,000 to $100,000. Only 1 school provided coverage for elective fertility preservation, and none covered surrogacy expenses. Half of the schools are in states where fertility benefits are mandated.Conclusion: There is wide variation in fertility benefits offered at top medical schools across the country. Many schools offered coverage for fertility evaluation and treatments; however, majority had restrictions and limitations to the benefits, suggesting that there is still inadequate coverage provided. This study's selected sample also does not reflect other medical schools across the country, which may not be as well-resourced in their provision of fertility benefits.
引用
收藏
页码:1369 / 1373
页数:5
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [41] US CITIZENS AND FOREIGN MEDICAL-SCHOOLS
    EGAN, RL
    [J]. JAMA-JOURNAL OF THE AMERICAN MEDICAL ASSOCIATION, 1975, 232 (10): : 1028 - 1030
  • [42] Evaluating dermatology curricula in US medical schools
    Mirhossaini, Roya B.
    Flaten, Hania K.
    Dellavalle, Robert
    Dunnick, Cory
    [J]. JOURNAL OF THE AMERICAN ACADEMY OF DERMATOLOGY, 2019, 81 (04) : AB58 - AB58
  • [43] Social media policies at US medical schools
    Kind, Terry
    Genrich, Gillian
    Sodhi, Avneet
    Chretien, Katherine C.
    [J]. MEDICAL EDUCATION ONLINE, 2010, 15
  • [44] An update on biostatistics requirements in US medical schools
    Looney, SW
    Grady, CS
    Steiner, RP
    [J]. ACADEMIC MEDICINE, 1998, 73 (01) : 92 - 94
  • [45] US plans to boost number of medical schools
    Devi, Sharmila
    [J]. LANCET, 2010, 375 (9717): : 792 - 793
  • [46] Pain education at US medical and nursing schools
    Mongoven, J.
    Fishman, S.
    Young, H.
    Koebner, I.
    [J]. JOURNAL OF PAIN, 2014, 15 (04): : S38 - S38
  • [47] Admission of Asian Americans to US medical schools
    George, SA
    [J]. ACADEMIC MEDICINE, 1998, 73 (03) : 226 - 227
  • [48] One in Four - The Importance of Comprehensive Fertility Benefits for the Medical Workforce
    Kaye, Erica C.
    [J]. NEW ENGLAND JOURNAL OF MEDICINE, 2020, 382 (16): : 1491 - 1493
  • [49] The current status of medical genetics instruction in US and Canadian medical schools
    Thurston, Virginia Carol
    Wales, Paula Sue
    Bell, Mary Alice
    Torbeck, Laura
    Brokaw, James Joseph
    [J]. ACADEMIC MEDICINE, 2007, 82 (05) : 441 - 445
  • [50] The Prevalence and Practice of Academies of Medical Educators: A Survey of US Medical Schools
    Searle, Nancy S.
    Thompson, Britta M.
    Friedland, Joan A.
    Lomax, James W.
    Drutz, Jan E.
    Coburn, Michael
    Nelson, Elizabeth A.
    [J]. ACADEMIC MEDICINE, 2010, 85 (01) : 48 - 56