Fertility Benefits at Top US Medical Schools

被引:1
|
作者
Hoang, Kim [1 ,2 ]
Evans, Neal [3 ]
Aghajanova, Lusine [2 ,4 ]
Talib, Hina [5 ]
Linos, Eleni [2 ,6 ]
Gold, Jessica M. [1 ,2 ]
机构
[1] Stanford Univ, Sch Med, Acad Med Ctr, Dept Pediat, Pediat Hosp Med MC 5660,453 Quarry Rd, Palo Alto, CA 94304 USA
[2] Stanford Univ, Sch Med, Palo Alto, CA 94304 USA
[3] Stanford Univ, Univ Human Resources, Palo Alto, CA 94304 USA
[4] Stanford Univ, Sch Med, Dept Obstet & Gynecol, Palo Alto, CA 94304 USA
[5] Albert Einstein Coll Med, Dept Pediat, Bronx, NY 10467 USA
[6] Stanford Univ, Sch Med, Dept Dermatol, Palo Alto, CA 94304 USA
关键词
infertility benefits; medical schools; physicians; INSURANCE; COVERAGE;
D O I
10.1089/jwh.2021.0486
中图分类号
R1 [预防医学、卫生学];
学科分类号
1004 ; 120402 ;
摘要
Background: Female physicians have a higher prevalence of infertility compared with the general population. Physician well-being can be significantly impacted by the physical and emotional challenges associated with this, including the high cost of fertility treatments, which are often not covered by health insurance. There are limited data on the current state of fertility coverage available for physicians. This study examines fertility insurance benefits offered for faculty at top U.S. medical schools.Methods: Between March and April 2021, we reviewed fertility benefits at medical schools ranked in the top 14 for research as identified by the US News & World Report 2021. The summary plan descriptions of benefits were collected from each institution's human resources (HR) website and direct phone call to HR representatives. We examined descriptions of coverage for fertility services including evaluation, treatments, medications, maximum lifetime coverage, and whether a formal diagnosis of infertility was required for benefit eligibility.Results: Fourteen institutions offer benefits for fertility evaluation and 13 offer benefits for treatment. Of the 13 institutions that offer treatment coverage, 11 cover in vitro fertilization, with 6 having limits on the number of cycles. Twelve offer medication coverage. Ten institutions specified maximum lifetime coverage for treatments and medications, ranging from $10,000 to $100,000. Only 1 school provided coverage for elective fertility preservation, and none covered surrogacy expenses. Half of the schools are in states where fertility benefits are mandated.Conclusion: There is wide variation in fertility benefits offered at top medical schools across the country. Many schools offered coverage for fertility evaluation and treatments; however, majority had restrictions and limitations to the benefits, suggesting that there is still inadequate coverage provided. This study's selected sample also does not reflect other medical schools across the country, which may not be as well-resourced in their provision of fertility benefits.
引用
收藏
页码:1369 / 1373
页数:5
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [1] FERTILITY BENEFITS FOR RESIDENTS: PUBLICLY AVAILABLE INFORMATION AT THE TOP 50 US MEDICAL SCHOOLS
    Rasouli, Melody A.
    Barrett, Francesca
    Levy, Morgan S.
    Kim, Ashley S.
    Roytman, Maya
    Cumbo, Nicole
    Talib, Hina
    Kaye, Erica C.
    [J]. FERTILITY AND STERILITY, 2022, 118 (04) : E195 - E195
  • [2] Publicly available information about fertility benefits for trainees at medical schools in the US
    Melody A. Rasouli
    Francesca Barrett
    Morgan S. Levy
    Ashley S. Kim
    Maya Roytman
    Nicole Cumbo
    Hina Talib
    Erica C. Kaye
    [J]. Journal of Assisted Reproduction and Genetics, 2023, 40 : 1313 - 1316
  • [3] Publicly available information about fertility benefits for trainees at medical schools in the US
    Rasouli, Melody A.
    Barrett, Francesca
    Levy, Morgan S.
    Kim, Ashley S.
    Roytman, Maya
    Cumbo, Nicole
    Talib, Hina
    Kaye, Erica C.
    [J]. JOURNAL OF ASSISTED REPRODUCTION AND GENETICS, 2023, 40 (06) : 1313 - 1316
  • [4] Paid Family and Childbearing Leave Policies at Top US Medical Schools
    Riano, Nicholas S.
    Linos, Eleni
    Accurso, Erin C.
    Sung, Dawn
    Linos, Elizabeth
    Simard, Julia F.
    Mangurian, Christina
    [J]. JAMA-JOURNAL OF THE AMERICAN MEDICAL ASSOCIATION, 2018, 319 (06): : 611 - 614
  • [5] Increasing Latinx representation in the US medical schools: A top-ranked medical school's experience
    Corsino, Leonor
    Chinea, Felix M.
    Yee, Linton
    Fuller, Anthony T.
    [J]. FRONTIERS IN PUBLIC HEALTH, 2022, 10
  • [6] Implementation of Federal Dependent Care Policies for Physician Scientists at Top US Medical Schools
    Ormseth, C.
    Jagsi, R.
    Lowenstein, D.
    Hsia, R.
    [J]. ANNALS OF EMERGENCY MEDICINE, 2019, 74 (04) : S25 - S25
  • [7] Sabbaticals in US Medical Schools
    Robiner, William N.
    Buum, Heather Thompson
    Eckerstorfer, Margaret
    Kim, Michael H.
    Kirsch, Jonathan D.
    [J]. AMERICAN JOURNAL OF MEDICINE, 2023, 136 (03): : 322 - 328
  • [8] Assessment of Paid Childbearing and Family Leave Policies for Administrative Staff at Top US Medical Schools
    Vance, Mary C.
    Riano, Nicholas S.
    Jagsi, Reshina
    Guzman, Marlene J.
    Beeler, Whitney
    Linos, Eleni
    Mangurian, Christina
    [J]. JAMA INTERNAL MEDICINE, 2020, 180 (04) : 589 - 592
  • [9] Employment benefits across US allopathic medical schools: National norms and relationships with institutional wealth
    Goldberg, Brian J.
    Ferrigno, Christopher
    Schundler, Sabrina F.
    Norrell, Eric S.
    Fox, Leah
    Woods, Sabrina
    Wilson, Adam B.
    [J]. ANATOMICAL SCIENCES EDUCATION, 2024, 17 (03) : 529 - 538
  • [10] Changes in the US Medical Licensure Examination and impact on US medical schools
    Wartman, SA
    Littlefield, JH
    [J]. JAMA-JOURNAL OF THE AMERICAN MEDICAL ASSOCIATION, 2005, 293 (04): : 424 - 425