The effect of prophylactic uterine artery embolization on reproductive outcomes in patients with cesarean scar pregnancy: a propensity score-matched study

被引:2
|
作者
Wang, Jiao [1 ]
Wang, Dandan [1 ]
Zhang, Xinyue [2 ]
Liu, Yuting [1 ]
Yang, Qing [1 ]
Zhang, Ningning [1 ]
机构
[1] China Med Univ, Dept Obstet & Gynecol, Shengjing Hosp, 36 Sanhao St, Shenyang 110004, Peoples R China
[2] Inner Mongolia Med Univ, Dept Obstet & Gynecol, Affiliated Hosp, Hohhot 010050, Peoples R China
基金
中国国家自然科学基金;
关键词
Uterine artery embolization; Cesarean scar pregnancy; Fertility; HYSTEROSCOPY; WOMEN;
D O I
10.1007/s00404-021-06347-6
中图分类号
R71 [妇产科学];
学科分类号
100211 ;
摘要
Purpose This study aimed to investigate the effect of prophylactic uterine artery embolization (UAE) on reproductive outcomes in patients with cesarean scar pregnancy (CSP). Methods A retrospective case-control study was conducted using the hospital records of all women diagnosed with CSP during a period of 6 years, between January 2014 and December 2019, at Shengjing Hospital of China Medical University. The clinical characteristics and different treatment modalities were analyzed. According to the inclusion and exclusion criteria, 181 patients with reproductive needs were selected and divided into a UAE group (n = 51) and a non-UAE group (n = 130) according to whether they received preventive UAE before their hysteroscopic or laparoscopic operation. The basic characteristics and pregnancy outcomes of patients in each group were compared, and a propensity score-matched (PSM) analysis was used to produce 37 matched pairs. Results Before PSM, the UAE group had a thinner muscle layer, larger mass size, and higher serum human chorionic gonadotropin level than the non-UAE group. The pregnancy rate and live birth rate of the UAE group were 54.9% and 61.9%, respectively, which were lower than those of the non-UAE group (61.5% and 66.7%), but no statistical differences were observed. Post-PSM, no significant differences between basic characteristics of the groups were observed. The pregnancy rate of the UAE group was 51.4%, which was lower than that of the non-UAE group (73.0%); the live birth rate of the UAE group was 64.3%, which was also lower than that of the non-UAE group (72.7%); however, the differences were not statistically significant with the P value of 0.077 and 0.716. Conclusion Prophylactic UAE did not induce a significant difference in pregnancy rate and live birth rate between the UAE group and the non-UAE group.
引用
收藏
页码:651 / 659
页数:9
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [21] Uterine artery embolization with and without local methotrexate infusion for the treatment of cesarean scar pregnancy
    Qi, Feng
    Zhou, Wei
    Wang, Mei-Fen
    Chai, Ze-Ying
    Zheng, Ling-Zhi
    TAIWANESE JOURNAL OF OBSTETRICS & GYNECOLOGY, 2015, 54 (04): : 376 - 380
  • [22] Uterine artery embolization compared with methotrexate for the management of pregnancy implanted within a cesarean scar
    Zhuang, YaLing
    Huang, LiLi
    AMERICAN JOURNAL OF OBSTETRICS AND GYNECOLOGY, 2009, 201 (02) : 152.e1 - 152.e3
  • [23] The Treatment of Cesarean Scar Pregnancy with Uterine Artery Embolization and Curettage as Compared to Transvaginal Hysterotomy
    Chen, Huihui
    Zhou, Jieru
    Wang, Husheng
    Tan, Weilin
    Yao, Min
    Wang, Xipeng
    EUROPEAN JOURNAL OF OBSTETRICS & GYNECOLOGY AND REPRODUCTIVE BIOLOGY, 2017, 214 : 44 - 49
  • [24] The effect of endometrial scratch on pregnancy outcomes of frozen-thawed embryo transfer: a propensity score-matched study
    Han, Xiao
    Hu, Linli
    GYNECOLOGICAL ENDOCRINOLOGY, 2022, 38 (01) : 39 - 44
  • [25] Comparison of outcome between intrauterine balloon tamponade and uterine artery embolization in the management of persistent postpartum hemorrhage: A propensity score-matched cohort study
    Ramler, Paul I.
    Henriquez, Dacia D. C. A.
    van den Akker, Thomas
    Caram-Deelder, Camila
    Groenwold, Rolf H. H.
    Bloemenkamp, Kitty W. M.
    van Roosmalen, Jos
    van Lith, Jan M. M.
    van der Bom, Johanna G.
    Cessie, S.
    Eikenboom, H. C. J.
    So-Osman, C.
    van de Watering, L. M. G.
    Zwaginga, J. J.
    Zwart, J. J.
    Loeff, R. M.
    van Goeverden, R. J.
    Eijlers, B.
    Hillebrand, A.
    Spelmin, S. E.
    Beunder, T. J.
    Harskamp, V
    Wind, M.
    Koning, M. D.
    Cramer, R. A.
    Veenstra, A.
    Smith, S. M.
    Ensing, E. E.
    van Brussel-de Groot, C. J.
    Zouitni, O.
    ACTA OBSTETRICIA ET GYNECOLOGICA SCANDINAVICA, 2019, 98 (11) : 1473 - 1482
  • [26] Association of menstrual blood volume and reproductive outcomes in patients with caesarean scar pregnancy managed using uterine artery embolization and curettage
    Cao, Guangshao
    Liu, Ruiqing
    Liu, Jianwen
    Liu, Jian
    Liu, Yuyan
    Li, Lupeng
    Zhao, Xiaoyang
    Li, Hui
    Cao, Huicun
    HUMAN FERTILITY, 2023, 26 (06) : 1491 - 1496
  • [27] Effect of malnutrition on outcomes in patients with heart failure: A large retrospective propensity score-matched cohort study
    Qian, Yunzhi
    Qian, Xinxuan
    Shen, Max
    Vu, Alexander
    Seres, David S.
    NUTRITION IN CLINICAL PRACTICE, 2022, 37 (01) : 130 - 136
  • [28] Differentiated thyroid cancer and adverse pregnancy outcomes: a propensity score-matched retrospective cohort study
    Li, Xin
    Mei, Fang
    Xiao, Wu-Cai
    Zhang, Fan
    Zhang, Shanghang
    Fu, Peng
    Chen, Jing
    Shan, Rui
    Sun, Bang-Kai
    Song, Shi-Bing
    Yuan, Chunhui
    Liu, Zheng
    FRONTIERS IN PEDIATRICS, 2024, 12
  • [29] Perioperative Blood Loss after Preoperative Prostatic Artery Embolization in Patients Undergoing Simple Prostatectomy: A Propensity Score-Matched Study
    Sare, Antony
    Kothari, Pankti
    Cieslak, John A., III
    Gantz, Owen
    Aly, Samuel
    Kumar, Abhishek
    Patel, Nitin
    Shukla, Pratik A.
    JOURNAL OF VASCULAR AND INTERVENTIONAL RADIOLOGY, 2021, 32 (08) : 1113 - 1118
  • [30] Impact of Pregnancy on Kidney Transplant Recipients: A Propensity Score-Matched Study
    Abe, T.
    Taniguchi, A.
    Kawamura, M.
    Nakazawa, S.
    Kato, T.
    Imamura, R.
    Nonomura, N.
    AMERICAN JOURNAL OF TRANSPLANTATION, 2020, 20 : 998 - 998