Productivity benefits of industrial energy efficiency measures

被引:239
|
作者
Worrell, E
Laitner, JA
Ruth, M
Finman, H
机构
[1] Lawrence Berkeley Natl Lab, Energy Anal Dept, Berkeley, CA 94720 USA
[2] US EPA, Washington, DC 20460 USA
关键词
All Open Access; Green;
D O I
10.1016/S0360-5442(03)00091-4
中图分类号
O414.1 [热力学];
学科分类号
摘要
We review the relationship between energy efficiency improvement measures and productivity in industry. We review over 70 industrial case studies from widely available published databases, followed by an analysis of the representation of productivity benefits in energy modeling. We propose a method to include productivity benefits in the economic assessment of the potential for energy efficiency improvement. The case-study review suggests that energy efficiency investments can provide a significant boost to overall productivity within industry. If this relationship holds, the description of energy-efficient technologies as opportunities for larger productivity improvements has significant implications for conventional economic assessments. The paper explores the implications this change in perspective on the evaluation of energy-efficient technologies for a study of the iron and steel industry in the US. This examination shows that including productivity benefits explicitly in the modeling parameters would double the cost-effective potential for energy efficiency improvement, compared to an analysis excluding those benefits. We provide suggestions for future research in this important area. Published by Elsevier Science Ltd.
引用
收藏
页码:1081 / 1098
页数:18
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [21] Assessment of retrofit measures for industrial halls: energy efficiency and renovation budget estimation
    Simson, Raimo
    Fadejev, Jevgeni
    Kurnitski, Jarek
    Kesti, Jyrki
    Lautso, Petteri
    [J]. Sustainable Built Environment Tallinn and Helsinki Conference SBE16 Build Green and Renovate Deep, 2016, 96 : 124 - 133
  • [22] Implementation of energy efficiency measures in compressed air systems: barriers, drivers and non-energy benefits
    Therese Nehler
    Ricardo Parra
    Patrik Thollander
    [J]. Energy Efficiency, 2018, 11 : 1281 - 1302
  • [23] Implementation of energy efficiency measures in compressed air systems: barriers, drivers and non-energy benefits
    Nehler, Therese
    Parra, Ricardo
    Thollander, Patrik
    [J]. ENERGY EFFICIENCY, 2018, 11 (05) : 1281 - 1302
  • [24] Increase Energy Efficiency and Productivity
    Maurer-Fritz, Kirsten
    [J]. WOCHENBLATT FUR PAPIERFABRIKATION, 2015, 143 (04): : 218 - 223
  • [25] Low-Cost Industrial Monitoring Platform for Energy Efficiency and Optimized Plant Productivity
    Marellapudi, Aniruddh
    Kulkarni, Shreyas
    Liptak, Szilard
    Jayaraman, Sathish
    Divan, Deepak
    [J]. 45TH ANNUAL CONFERENCE OF THE IEEE INDUSTRIAL ELECTRONICS SOCIETY (IECON 2019), 2019, : 5532 - 5537
  • [26] A Systematic Literature Review of Methods for Improved Utilisation of the Non-Energy Benefits of Industrial Energy Efficiency
    Nehler, Therese
    [J]. ENERGIES, 2018, 11 (12)
  • [27] PROGNOSTICATION OF MEASURES EFFICIENCY ON THE WELLS PRODUCTIVITY CHANGE
    KAZAKOV, AA
    [J]. NEFTYANOE KHOZYAISTVO, 1983, (09): : 62 - 65
  • [28] Efficiency and productivity measures for high contact services
    Klassen, KJ
    Russell, RM
    Chrisman, JJ
    [J]. SERVICE INDUSTRIES JOURNAL, 1998, 18 (04): : 1 - 18
  • [29] A simultaneous optimization approach for efficiency measures regarding design and operation of industrial energy systems
    Hofmann, Rene
    Panuschka, Sophie
    Beck, Anton
    [J]. COMPUTERS & CHEMICAL ENGINEERING, 2019, 128 : 246 - 260
  • [30] Carbon reductions and health co-benefits from US residential energy efficiency measures
    Levy, Jonathan I.
    Woo, May K.
    Penn, Stefani L.
    Omary, Mohammad
    Tambouret, Yann
    Kim, Chloe S.
    Arunachalam, Saravanan
    [J]. ENVIRONMENTAL RESEARCH LETTERS, 2016, 11 (03):