Impacts of dietary silver nanoparticles and probiotic administration on the microbiota of an in-vitro gut model

被引:35
|
作者
Catto, Cristina [1 ]
Garuglieri, Elisa [1 ]
Borruso, Luigimaria [2 ]
Erba, Daniela [1 ]
Casiraghi, Maria Cristina [1 ]
Cappitelli, Francesca [1 ]
Villa, Federica [1 ]
Zecchin, Sarah [1 ]
Zanchi, Raffaella [1 ]
机构
[1] Univ Milan, Dept Food Environm & Nutr Sci, Via Celoria 2, I-20133 Milan, Italy
[2] Free Univ Bozen, Fac Sci & Technol, Piazza Univ 5, I-39100 Bolzano, Italy
关键词
Silver nanoparticles; Fecal microbiota; Gut model; Phylogenetic and functional profile; Toxicity; SITU HYBRIDIZATION; CONSUMER PRODUCTS; CELLULAR UPTAKE; NANO-SILVER; CYTOTOXICITY; BACTERIA; RELEASE; SIZE; GENOTOXICITY; FERMENTATION;
D O I
10.1016/j.envpol.2018.11.019
中图分类号
X [环境科学、安全科学];
学科分类号
08 ; 0830 ;
摘要
Ingestion of silver nanoparticles (AgNPs) is inevitable linked to their widespread use in food, medicines and other consumer products. However, their effects on human microbiota at non-lethal concentrations remain poorly understood. In this study, the interactions among 1 mu g mL(-1) AgNPs, the intestinal microbiota, and the probiotic Bacillus subtilis (BS) were tested using in-vitro batch fermentation models inoculated with human fecal matter. Results from metagenomic investigations revealed that the core bacterial community was not affected by the exposure of AgNPs and BS at the later stage of fermentation, while the proportions of rare species changed drastically with the treatments. Furthermore, shifts in the Firmicutes/Bacteriodetes (F/B) ratios were observed after 24 h with an increase in the relative abundance of Firmicutes species and a decrease in Bacteroidetes in all fermentation cultures. The co-exposure to AgNPs and BS led to the lowest F/B ratio. Fluorescent in-situ hybridization analyses indicated that non-lethal concentration of AgNPs negatively affected the relative percentage of Faecalibacterium prausnitzii and Clostridium coccoides/Eubacterium rectales taxa in the fermentation cultures after 24 h. However, exposure to single and combined treatments of AgNPs and BS did not change the overall diversity of the fecal microflora. Functional differences in cell motility, translation, transport. and xenobiotics degradation occurred in AgNPs-treated fermentation cultures but not in AgNPs+BS-treated samples. Compared to the control samples, treated fecal cultures showed no significant statistical differences in terms of short-chain fatty acids profiles, cytotoxic and genotoxic effects on Caco-2 cell monolayers. Overall, AgNPs did not affect the composition and diversity of the core fecal microflora and its metabolic and toxic profiles. This work indicated a chemopreventive role of probiotic on fecal microflora against AgNPs, which were shown by the decrease of F/B ratio and the unaltered state of some key metabolic pathways. (C) 2018 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.
引用
收藏
页码:754 / 763
页数:10
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [21] Effect of endocrine disrupting chemicals on gut microbiota in the in-vitro model of enteric nervous system
    Balaguer-Trias, J.
    Deepika, D.
    Blanco, J.
    Schuhmacher, M.
    Kumar, V.
    TOXICOLOGY LETTERS, 2022, 368 : S151 - S151
  • [22] Probiotic Administration in an Endometriosis Animal Model Can Influence the Gut Microbiota and Gut-Brain Axis to Counteract the Effects of Stress
    Chompre, Gladys
    Cruz, Myrella L.
    Arroyo, Gerardo A.
    Rivera, Raquel M.
    Colon, Maria C.
    Appleyard, Caroline B.
    FASEB JOURNAL, 2018, 32 (01):
  • [23] The effect of administration of probiotic bacteria on the composition of the mucosal gut microbiota in IBS patients
    Sundin, J.
    Brummer, J. R.
    Vos, W. D.
    Fuentes, S.
    Rangel, I.
    NEUROGASTROENTEROLOGY AND MOTILITY, 2012, 24 : 56 - 56
  • [24] Sex dependent effects of silver nanoparticles on the zebrafish gut microbiota
    Ma, Yanbo
    Song, Liyan
    Lei, Yu
    Jia, Panpan
    Lu, Chunjiao
    Wu, Jianfeng
    Xi, Chuanwu
    Strauss, Phyllis R.
    Pei, De-Sheng
    ENVIRONMENTAL SCIENCE-NANO, 2018, 5 (03) : 740 - 751
  • [25] A DYNAMIC IN VITRO MODEL OF THE HUMAN GUT MICROBIOTA
    Biagini, Francesco
    Calvigioni, Marco
    Botte, Ermes
    De Maria, Carmelo
    Montemurro, Francesca
    Magliaro, Chiara
    Celandroni, Francesco
    Mazzantini, Diletta
    Ghelardi, Emilia
    Vozzi, Giovanni
    TISSUE ENGINEERING PART A, 2022, 28 : S158 - S158
  • [26] Effect of Dietary Fiber Sources on In-Vitro Fermentation and Microbiota in Monogastrics
    Ngalavu, Asavela
    Jiang, Hailong
    El-Ashram, Saeed
    Tellez-Isaias, Guillermo
    Farouk, Mohammed Hamdy
    Nyingwa, Pakama Siphelele
    Seidu, Adams
    Tyasi, Thobela Louis
    ANIMALS, 2020, 10 (04):
  • [27] Perspective: Leveraging the Gut Microbiota to Predict Personalized Responses to Dietary, Prebiotic, and Probiotic Interventions
    Gibbons, Sean M.
    Gurry, Thomas
    Lampe, Johanna W.
    Chakrabarti, Anirikh
    Dam, Veerle
    Everard, Amandine
    Goas, Almudena
    Gabriele, Gross
    Kleerebez, Michiel
    Lane, Jonathan
    Maukonen, Johanna
    Penna, Ana Lucia Barretto
    Pot, Bruno
    Valdes, Ana M.
    Walton, Gemma
    Weiss, Adrienne
    Zanzer, Yoghatama Cindya
    Venlet, Naomi V.
    Miani, Michela
    ADVANCES IN NUTRITION, 2022, 13 (05) : 1450 - 1461
  • [28] The Gut-Brain Axis. Dietary, Probiotic, and Prebiotic Interventions on the Microbiota.
    Hyland, N.
    Stanton, C.
    ANTICANCER RESEARCH, 2024, 44 (04)
  • [29] At-hatch administration of probiotic to chickens can introduce beneficial changes in gut microbiota
    Baldwin, Stephen
    Hughes, Robert J.
    Thi Thu Hao Van
    Moore, Robert J.
    Stanley, Dragana
    PLOS ONE, 2018, 13 (03):
  • [30] In-vitro dynamic fermentation simulation colon reactor for gut microbiota incubation
    Li, Zhi-tao
    Wang, Yu-ying
    Ji, Hang-yan
    Jiang, Yun
    Gao, Min-jie
    Zhan, Xiao-bei
    Jin, Zhengyu
    BIOCHEMICAL ENGINEERING JOURNAL, 2023, 193