Food safety assurance system for fresh produce production in Thailand: a review

被引:12
|
作者
Wongprawmas, R. [1 ]
Canavari, M. [1 ]
Waisarayutt, C. [2 ]
机构
[1] Alma Mater Studiorum Univ Bologna, Dept Agr Sci, I-40127 Bologna, Italy
[2] Kasetsart Univ, Dept Agroind Technol, Bangkok 10900, Thailand
关键词
good agricultural practices; perceptual map; standards; QUALITY; CERTIFICATION; STANDARDS; ADOPTION; TRACEABILITY; PERCEPTIONS; VEGETABLES; FRUITS; MODEL;
D O I
10.3920/QAS2013.0255
中图分类号
TS2 [食品工业];
学科分类号
0832 ;
摘要
In 2004, the Thai government enacted a food safety policy, 'from-farm-to-table', to ensure food safety throughout the food chain. Several food safety assurance systems such as good agricultural practices (GAP) are employed to control and monitor food safety. Nevertheless, a lack of confidence in food safety of products in the domestic market still exists. This study aimed to describe and analyse the current situation of GAP standards implemented in fresh produce production in Thailand. A mixed explorative and descriptive approach was used by reviewing literature and using multidimensional scaling to draw a subjective perceptual map of the relative position of the set of GAP standards adopted in Thailand. Food safety law and regulations were discussed with a comparative analysis of the three kinds of GAP standards applied in Thailand. The subjective perceptual map of the different GAP standards shows that the standards may be positioned with reference to two dimensions: 'trustworthiness' and 'usefulness for the business'. The problem of GAP implementation in Thailand is rooted in a lack of knowledge and understanding of principles and the perception of advantages of GAP adoption among stakeholders. The national GAP of Thailand, Q-GAP, is the most widely adopted standard. However, improvement of credibility of this standard is urgently required.
引用
收藏
页码:73 / 88
页数:16
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [41] Understanding the Fresh Produce Safety Challenges
    Hussain, Malik Altaf
    Gooneratne, Ravi
    FOODS, 2017, 6 (03)
  • [42] Improving the safety of fresh produce with antimicrobials
    Cherry, JP
    FOOD TECHNOLOGY, 1999, 53 (11) : 54 - +
  • [43] The key role of intermediaries in Thailand's fresh food distribution system
    Endo, Gen
    INTERNATIONAL REVIEW OF RETAIL DISTRIBUTION AND CONSUMER RESEARCH, 2014, 24 (05): : 544 - 563
  • [44] A review of microbial biofilms of produce: Future challenge to food safety
    Iqbal Kabir Jahid
    Sang-Do Ha
    Food Science and Biotechnology, 2012, 21 : 299 - 316
  • [45] Produce Growers' On-Farm Food Safety Education: A Review
    Chen, Han
    Kinchla, Amanda J.
    Richard, Nicole
    Shaw, Angela
    Feng, Yaohua
    JOURNAL OF FOOD PROTECTION, 2021, 84 (04) : 704 - 716
  • [46] Food Safety Risks of Harvesting Dropped and Drooping Produce: A Review
    Doren, Johanna
    Hadad, Robert
    McKEAG, Lisa
    Tucker, Caitlin
    Newbold, Elizabeth
    JOURNAL OF FOOD PROTECTION, 2022, 85 (04) : 571 - 582
  • [47] A review of microbial biofilms of produce: Future challenge to food safety
    Jahid, Iqbal Kabir
    Ha, Sang-Do
    FOOD SCIENCE AND BIOTECHNOLOGY, 2012, 21 (02) : 299 - 316
  • [48] Does a food safety label matter? Consumer heterogeneity and fresh produce risk perceptions under the Food Safety Modernization Act
    Neill, Clinton L.
    Holcomb, Rodney B.
    FOOD POLICY, 2019, 85 : 7 - 14
  • [49] Factors affecting the status of food safety management systems in the global fresh produce chain
    Kirezieva, Klementina
    Luning, Pieternel A.
    Jacxsens, Liesbeth
    Allende, Ana
    Johannessen, Gro S.
    Tondo, Eduardo Cesar
    Rajkovic, Andreja
    Uyttendaele, Mieke
    van Boekel, Martinus A. J. S.
    FOOD CONTROL, 2015, 52 : 85 - 97
  • [50] Food safety training and evaluation of handwashing intention among fresh produce farm workers
    Soon, J. M.
    Baines, R. N.
    FOOD CONTROL, 2012, 23 (02) : 437 - 448