Neural Substrates of Approach-Avoidance Conflict Decision-Making

被引:119
|
作者
Aupperle, Robin L. [1 ,2 ,3 ]
Melrose, Andrew J. [1 ]
Francisco, Alex [3 ]
Paulus, Martin P. [1 ,2 ]
Stein, Murray B. [1 ,2 ,4 ]
机构
[1] Univ Calif San Diego, Dept Psychiat, La Jolla, CA 92093 USA
[2] VA San Diego Healthcare Syst, Psychiat Serv, San Diego, CA USA
[3] Univ Missouri, Dept Psychol, Kansas City, MO 64114 USA
[4] Univ Calif San Diego, La Jolla, CA 92093 USA
关键词
prefrontal cortex; anterior cingulate cortex; insula; caudate; striatum; emotion; reward; punishment; ANTERIOR CINGULATE CORTEX; ORBITOFRONTAL CORTEX; PREFRONTAL CORTEX; FUNCTIONAL SPECIALIZATION; COGNITIVE CONTROL; VENTRAL STRIATUM; PREMOTOR AREAS; REWARD SIGNALS; AMYGDALA; BRAIN;
D O I
10.1002/hbm.22639
中图分类号
Q189 [神经科学];
学科分类号
071006 ;
摘要
Animal approach-avoidance conflict paradigms have been used extensively to operationalize anxiety, quantify the effects of anxiolytic agents, and probe the neural basis of fear and anxiety. Results from human neuroimaging studies support that a frontal-striatal-amygdala neural circuitry is important for approach-avoidance learning. However, the neural basis of decision-making is much less clear in this context. Thus, we combined a recently developed human approach-avoidance paradigm with functional magnetic resonance imaging (fMRI) to identify neural substrates underlying approach-avoidance conflict decision-making. Fifteen healthy adults completed the approach-avoidance conflict (AAC) paradigm during fMRI. Analyses of variance were used to compare conflict to nonconflict (avoid-threat and approach-reward) conditions and to compare level of reward points offered during the decision phase. Trial-by-trial amplitude modulation analyses were used to delineate brain areas underlying decision-making in the context of approach/avoidance behavior. Conflict trials as compared to the nonconflict trials elicited greater activation within bilateral anterior cingulate cortex, anterior insula, and caudate, as well as right dorsolateral prefrontal cortex (PFC). Right caudate and lateral PFC activation was modulated by level of reward offered. Individuals who showed greater caudate activation exhibited less approach behavior. On a trial-by-trial basis, greater right lateral PFC activation related to less approach behavior. Taken together, results suggest that the degree of activation within prefrontal-striatal-insula circuitry determines the degree of approach versus avoidance decision-making. Moreover, the degree of caudate and lateral PFC activation related to individual differences in approach-avoidance decision-making. Therefore, the approach-avoidance conflict paradigm is ideally suited to probe anxiety-related processing differences during approach-avoidance decision-making. Hum Brain Mapp 36:449-462, 2015. (c) 2014 Wiley Periodicals, Inc.
引用
收藏
页码:449 / 462
页数:14
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [21] Neural and Behavioral Correlates of Approach-Avoidance Conflict in a Large Transdiagnostic Sample
    Kirlic, Namik
    McDermott, Tim
    Aupperle, Robin
    Paulus, Martin
    NEUROPSYCHOPHARMACOLOGY, 2018, 43 : S272 - S272
  • [22] Elucidating medial temporal and frontal lobe contributions to approach-avoidance conflict decision-making using functional MRI and the hierarchical drift diffusion model
    Chu, Sonja
    Hutcherson, Cendri
    Ito, Rutsuko
    Lee, Andy C. H.
    CEREBRAL CORTEX, 2023, 33 (12) : 7797 - 7815
  • [23] TRACKING THE TEMPORAL DYNAMICS OF REWARD AND PUNISHMENT INFORMATION DURING APPROACH-AVOIDANCE DECISION-MAKING UNDER THREAT
    Klaassen, Felix
    Bramson, Bob
    Schoffelen, Jan-Mathijs
    de Voogd, Linda
    Roelofs, Karin
    PSYCHOPHYSIOLOGY, 2023, 60 : S5 - S5
  • [24] The ventral hippocampus is necessary for cue-elicited, but not outcome driven approach-avoidance conflict decisions: a novel operant choice decision-making task
    Cavdaroglu, Bilgehan
    Riaz, Sadia
    Yeung, Elton H. L.
    Lee, Andy C. H.
    Ito, Rutsuko
    NEUROPSYCHOPHARMACOLOGY, 2021, 46 (03) : 632 - 642
  • [25] The Neurocircuitry of Approach-Avoidance Decisions in Depression: I. Neuroeconomic Modeling of Reward and Utility in Decision-Making
    Kang, Min Su
    Ironside, Maria
    Amemori, Ken-ichi
    Curry, Jeffrey
    Mehta, Malavika
    McGrath, Callie
    Graybiel, Ann
    Pizzagalli, Diego
    NEUROPSYCHOPHARMACOLOGY, 2017, 42 : S193 - S194
  • [26] The ventral hippocampus is necessary for cue-elicited, but not outcome driven approach-avoidance conflict decisions: a novel operant choice decision-making task
    Bilgehan Çavdaroğlu
    Sadia Riaz
    Elton H. L. Yeung
    Andy C. H. Lee
    Rutsuko Ito
    Neuropsychopharmacology, 2021, 46 : 632 - 642
  • [27] Probing the neural substrates of decision-making processes
    Paulus, MP
    Stein, MB
    Feinstein, JS
    Miller, D
    Rogalsky, C
    BIOLOGICAL PSYCHIATRY, 2003, 53 (08) : 101S - 101S
  • [28] Human Hippocampus Arbitrates Approach-Avoidance Conflict
    Bach, Dominik R.
    Guitart-Masip, Marc
    Packard, Pau A.
    Miro, Julia
    Falip, Merce
    Fuentemilla, Lluis
    Dolan, Raymond J.
    CURRENT BIOLOGY, 2014, 24 (05) : 541 - 547
  • [29] Dispositional Anger and the Resolution of the Approach-Avoidance Conflict
    Robinson, Michael D.
    Boyd, Ryan L.
    Persich, Michelle R.
    EMOTION, 2016, 16 (06) : 838 - 849