Indexable Bayesian Personalized Ranking for Effiicient Top-k Recommendation

被引:11
|
作者
Le, Dung D. [1 ]
Lauw, Hady W. [1 ]
机构
[1] Singapore Management Univ, 80 Stamford Rd, Singapore 178902, Singapore
基金
新加坡国家研究基金会;
关键词
D O I
10.1145/3132847.3132913
中图分类号
TP [自动化技术、计算机技术];
学科分类号
0812 ;
摘要
Top-k recommendation seeks to deliver a personalized recommendation list of k items to a user. The dual objectives are (1) accuracy in identifying the items a user is likely to prefer, and (2) efficiency in constructing the recommendation list in real time. One direction towards retrieval efficiency is to formulate retrieval as approximate k nearest neighbor (kNN) search aided by indexing schemes, such as locality-sensitive hashing, spatial trees, and inverted index. These schemes, applied on the output representations of recommendation algorithms, speed up the retrieval process by automatically discarding a large number of potentially irrelevant items when given a user query vector. However, many previous recommendation algorithms produce representations that may not necessarily align well with the structural properties of these indexing schemes, eventually resulting in a significant loss of accuracy post-indexing. In this paper, we introduce Indexable Bayesian Personalized Ranking (INDEXABLE BPR) that learns from ordinal preference to produce representation that is inherently compatible with the aforesaid indices. Experiments on publicly available datasets show superior performance of the proposed model compared to state-of-the-art methods on top-k recommendation retrieval task, achieving significant speedup while maintaining high accuracy.
引用
收藏
页码:1389 / 1398
页数:10
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [1] Top-k Ranking Bayesian Optimization
    Quoc Phong Nguyen
    Tay, Sebastian
    Low, Bryan Kian Hsiang
    Jaillet, Patrick
    [J]. THIRTY-FIFTH AAAI CONFERENCE ON ARTIFICIAL INTELLIGENCE, THIRTY-THIRD CONFERENCE ON INNOVATIVE APPLICATIONS OF ARTIFICIAL INTELLIGENCE AND THE ELEVENTH SYMPOSIUM ON EDUCATIONAL ADVANCES IN ARTIFICIAL INTELLIGENCE, 2021, 35 : 9135 - 9143
  • [2] Classification, Ranking, and Top-K Stability of Recommendation Algorithms
    Adomavicius, Gediminas
    Zhang, Jingjing
    [J]. INFORMS JOURNAL ON COMPUTING, 2016, 28 (01) : 129 - 147
  • [3] Differentiable Ranking Metric Using Relaxed Sorting for Top-K Recommendation
    Lee, Hyunsung
    Cho, Sangwoo
    Jang, Yeongjae
    Kim, Jaekwang
    Woo, Honguk
    [J]. IEEE ACCESS, 2021, 9 : 114649 - 114658
  • [4] Differentiable Ranking Metric Using Relaxed Sorting for Top-K Recommendation
    Lee, Hyunsung
    Cho, Sangwoo
    Jang, Yeongjae
    Kim, Jaekwang
    Woo, Honguk
    [J]. IEEE Access, 2021, 9 : 114649 - 114658
  • [5] Is Top-k Sufficient for Ranking?
    Lan, Yanyan
    Niu, Shuzi
    Guo, Jiafeng
    Cheng, Xueqi
    [J]. PROCEEDINGS OF THE 22ND ACM INTERNATIONAL CONFERENCE ON INFORMATION & KNOWLEDGE MANAGEMENT (CIKM'13), 2013, : 1261 - 1270
  • [6] Adversarial Top-K Ranking
    Suh, Changho
    Tan, Vincent Y. F.
    Zhao, Renbo
    [J]. IEEE TRANSACTIONS ON INFORMATION THEORY, 2017, 63 (04) : 2201 - 2225
  • [7] On Sampling Top-K Recommendation Evaluation
    Li, Dong
    Jin, Ruoming
    Gao, Jing
    Liu, Zhi
    [J]. KDD '20: PROCEEDINGS OF THE 26TH ACM SIGKDD INTERNATIONAL CONFERENCE ON KNOWLEDGE DISCOVERY & DATA MINING, 2020, : 2114 - 2124
  • [8] Collaborative Personalized Top-k Processing
    Bai, Xiao
    Guerraoui, Rachid
    Kermarrec, Anne-Marie
    Leroy, Vincent
    [J]. ACM TRANSACTIONS ON DATABASE SYSTEMS, 2011, 36 (04):
  • [9] Answering Definition Question: Ranking for Top-k
    Shen, Chao
    Qiu, Xipeng
    Huang, Xuanjing
    Wu, Lide
    [J]. ECAI 2008, PROCEEDINGS, 2008, 178 : 839 - +
  • [10] Competitive analysis of the top-K ranking problem
    Chen, Xi
    Gopi, Sivakanth
    Mao, Jieming
    Schneider, Jon
    [J]. PROCEEDINGS OF THE TWENTY-EIGHTH ANNUAL ACM-SIAM SYMPOSIUM ON DISCRETE ALGORITHMS, 2017, : 1245 - 1264