Adversarial Top-K Ranking

被引:13
|
作者
Suh, Changho [1 ]
Tan, Vincent Y. F. [2 ,3 ]
Zhao, Renbo [2 ,3 ,4 ]
机构
[1] Korea Adv Inst Sci & Technol, Sch Elect Engn, Taejon 305701, South Korea
[2] Natl Univ Singapore, Dept Elect & Comp Engn, Singapore 117583, Singapore
[3] NUS, Dept Math, Singapore 119076, Singapore
[4] NUS, Dept Ind & Syst Engn, Singapore 117576, Singapore
基金
新加坡国家研究基金会;
关键词
Adversarial population; Bradley-Terry-Luce model; crowdsourcing; minimax optimality; sample complexity; top-K ranking; tensor decompositions;
D O I
10.1109/TIT.2017.2659660
中图分类号
TP [自动化技术、计算机技术];
学科分类号
0812 ;
摘要
We study the top-K ranking problem where the goal is to recover the set of top-K ranked items out of a large collection of items based on partially revealed preferences. We consider an adversarial crowdsourced setting where there are two population sets, and pairwise comparison samples drawn from one of the populations follow the standard Bradley-Terry-Luce model (i.e., the chance of item i beating item j is proportional to the relative score of item i to item j), while in the other population, the corresponding chance is inversely proportional to the relative score. When the relative size of the two populations is known, we characterize the minimax limit on the sample size required (up to a constant) for reliably identifying the top-K items, and demonstrate how it scales with the relative size. Moreover, by leveraging a tensor decomposition method for disambiguating mixture distributions, we extend our result to the more realistic scenario, in which the relative population size is unknown, thus establishing an upper bound on the fundamental limit of the sample size for recovering the top-K set.
引用
收藏
页码:2201 / 2225
页数:25
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [1] Is Top-k Sufficient for Ranking?
    Lan, Yanyan
    Niu, Shuzi
    Guo, Jiafeng
    Cheng, Xueqi
    [J]. PROCEEDINGS OF THE 22ND ACM INTERNATIONAL CONFERENCE ON INFORMATION & KNOWLEDGE MANAGEMENT (CIKM'13), 2013, : 1261 - 1270
  • [2] Top-k Ranking Bayesian Optimization
    Quoc Phong Nguyen
    Tay, Sebastian
    Low, Bryan Kian Hsiang
    Jaillet, Patrick
    [J]. THIRTY-FIFTH AAAI CONFERENCE ON ARTIFICIAL INTELLIGENCE, THIRTY-THIRD CONFERENCE ON INNOVATIVE APPLICATIONS OF ARTIFICIAL INTELLIGENCE AND THE ELEVENTH SYMPOSIUM ON EDUCATIONAL ADVANCES IN ARTIFICIAL INTELLIGENCE, 2021, 35 : 9135 - 9143
  • [3] Competitive analysis of the top-K ranking problem
    Chen, Xi
    Gopi, Sivakanth
    Mao, Jieming
    Schneider, Jon
    [J]. PROCEEDINGS OF THE TWENTY-EIGHTH ANNUAL ACM-SIAM SYMPOSIUM ON DISCRETE ALGORITHMS, 2017, : 1245 - 1264
  • [4] Answering Definition Question: Ranking for Top-k
    Shen, Chao
    Qiu, Xipeng
    Huang, Xuanjing
    Wu, Lide
    [J]. ECAI 2008, PROCEEDINGS, 2008, 178 : 839 - +
  • [5] On Pruning for Top-K Ranking in Uncertain Databases
    Wang, Chonghai
    Yuan, Li Yan
    You, Jia-Huai
    Zaiane, Osmar R.
    Pei, Jian
    [J]. PROCEEDINGS OF THE VLDB ENDOWMENT, 2011, 4 (10): : 598 - 609
  • [6] Learning Ordered Top-k Adversarial Attacks via Adversarial Distillation
    Zhang, Zekun
    Wu, Tianfu
    [J]. 2020 IEEE/CVF CONFERENCE ON COMPUTER VISION AND PATTERN RECOGNITION WORKSHOPS (CVPRW 2020), 2020, : 3364 - 3373
  • [7] FA*IR: A Fair Top-k Ranking Algorithm
    Zehlike, Meike
    Bonchi, Francesco
    Castillo, Carlos
    Hajian, Sara
    Megahed, Mohamed
    Baeza-Yates, Ricardo
    [J]. CIKM'17: PROCEEDINGS OF THE 2017 ACM CONFERENCE ON INFORMATION AND KNOWLEDGE MANAGEMENT, 2017, : 1569 - 1578
  • [8] Top-K Ranking: An Information-theoretic Perspective
    Chen, Yuxin
    Suh, Changho
    [J]. 2015 IEEE INFORMATION THEORY WORKSHOP - FALL (ITW), 2015, : 212 - 213
  • [9] On the semantics of top-k ranking for objects with uncertain data
    Wang, Chonghai
    Yuan, Li Yan
    You, Jia-Huai
    [J]. COMPUTERS & MATHEMATICS WITH APPLICATIONS, 2011, 62 (07) : 2812 - 2823
  • [10] Fair Top-k Ranking with multiple protected groups
    Zehlike, Meike
    Suehr, Tom
    Baeza-Yates, Ricardo
    Bonchi, Francesco
    Castillo, Carlos
    Hajian, Sara
    [J]. INFORMATION PROCESSING & MANAGEMENT, 2022, 59 (01)