The impact of dynamic roughness elements on marginally separated boundary layers

被引:2
|
作者
Servini, P. [1 ]
Smith, F. T. [1 ]
Rothmayer, A. P. [2 ]
机构
[1] UCL, Dept Math, Gower St, London WC1E 6BT, England
[2] Iowa State Univ, Dept Aerosp Engn, Ames, IA 50011 USA
关键词
boundary layer control; boundary layer separation; flow-structure interactions; REYNOLDS-NUMBER; FLOW; OBSTACLES; SINGULARITY;
D O I
10.1017/jfm.2018.589
中图分类号
O3 [力学];
学科分类号
08 ; 0801 ;
摘要
It has been shown experimentally that dynamic roughness elements - small bumps embedded within a boundary layer, oscillating at a fixed frequency - are able to increase the angle of attack at which a laminar boundary layer will separate from the leading edge of an airfoil (Grager et al., in 6th AIAA Flow Control Conference, 2012, pp. 25-28). In this paper, we attempt to verify that such an increase is possible by considering a two-dimensional dynamic roughness element in the context of marginal separation theory, and suggest the mechanisms through which any increase may come about. We will show that a dynamic roughness element can increase the value of Gamma(c) as compared to the clean airfoil case; Gamma(c) represents, mathematically, the critical value of the parameter Gamma below which a solution exists in the governing equations and, physically, the maximum angle of attack possible below which a laminar boundary layer will remain predominantly attached to the surface. Furthermore, we find that the dynamic roughness element impacts on the perturbation pressure gradient in two possible ways: either by decreasing the magnitude of the adverse pressure peak or by increasing the streamwise extent in which favourable pressure perturbations exist. Finally, we discover that the marginal separation bubble does not necessarily have to exist at Gamma = Gamma(c) in the time-averaged flow and that full breakaway separation can therefore occur as a result of the bursting of transient bubbles existing within the length scale of marginal separation theory.
引用
收藏
页码:351 / 370
页数:20
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [31] Kinematic and acoustic similarities of separated turbulent boundary layers
    Suryadi, Alexandre
    AIAA Journal, 2019, 57 (06): : 2435 - 2446
  • [32] Kinematic and Acoustic Similarities of Separated Turbulent Boundary Layers
    Suryadi, Alexandre
    AIAA JOURNAL, 2019, 57 (06) : 2435 - 2446
  • [33] PREDICTION OF TRANSITIONAL AND SEPARATED BOUNDARY LAYERS IN A COMPRESSOR CASCADE
    Kamin, Manu
    Mathew, Joseph
    PROCEEDINGS OF THE ASME TURBO EXPO: TURBINE TECHNICAL CONFERENCE AND EXPOSITION, 2014, VOL 2B, 2014,
  • [34] A geometrical criterion for absolute instability in separated boundary layers
    Avanci, Mateus P.
    Rodriguez, Daniel
    Alves, Leonardo S. de B.
    PHYSICS OF FLUIDS, 2019, 31 (01)
  • [35] UNSTEADY BOUNDARY-LAYERS, SEPARATED AND ATTACHED - REVIEW
    TELIONIS, DP
    JOURNAL OF FLUIDS ENGINEERING-TRANSACTIONS OF THE ASME, 1979, 101 (01): : 29 - 43
  • [36] THE SEPARATED SHEAR LAYERS ASSOCIATED WITH HEMISPHERICAL BODIES IN TURBULENT BOUNDARY-LAYERS
    SAVORY, E
    TOY, N
    JOURNAL OF WIND ENGINEERING AND INDUSTRIAL AERODYNAMICS, 1988, 28 (1-3) : 291 - 300
  • [37] Impact of the Wall-Parallel Length Scale of Roughness on the Development of Turbulent Boundary Layers in Turbines
    Berhane, Abigail M.
    Longley, John P.
    JOURNAL OF TURBOMACHINERY-TRANSACTIONS OF THE ASME, 2025, 147 (02):
  • [38] IMPACT OF THE WALL-PARALLEL LENGTH SCALE OF ROUGHNESS ON THE DEVELOPMENT OF TURBULENT BOUNDARY LAYERS IN TURBINES
    Berhane, Abigail M.
    Longley, John P.
    PROCEEDINGS OF ASME TURBO EXPO 2024: TURBOMACHINERY TECHNICAL CONFERENCE AND EXPOSITION, GT2024, VOL 12B, 2024,
  • [39] Reynolds number and roughness effects on turbulent stresses in sandpaper roughness boundary layers
    Morrill-Winter, C.
    Squire, D. T.
    Klewicki, J. C.
    Hutchins, N.
    Schultz, M. P.
    Marusic, I.
    PHYSICAL REVIEW FLUIDS, 2017, 2 (05):
  • [40] Roughness-Induced Transition of Hypervelocity Boundary Layers
    Wise, Dylan J.
    Smart, Michael K.
    JOURNAL OF SPACECRAFT AND ROCKETS, 2014, 51 (03) : 847 - 854