On Reading God's Great Poem: A Delayed Response to Christopher Hookway

被引：3
|
作者：
Raposa, Michael L. [1 ]
机构：
[1] Lehigh Univ, Bethlehem, PA 18015 USA
来源：
TRANSACTIONS OF THE CHARLES S PEIRCE SOCIETY | 2018年 / 54卷 / 04期
关键词：
Charles S. Peirce; Christopher Hookway; Neglected Argument; Musement; Experiment; Reading;
D O I：
10.2979/trancharpeirsoc.54.4.04
中图分类号：
B [哲学、宗教];
学科分类号：
01 ; 0101 ;
摘要：
These brief comments constitute a long delayed response to Christopher Hook way's 1991 review essay (Semiotica, 1991) devoted to my book on Peirce's Philosophy of Religion (Indiana, 1989). Against the background of considerable agreement, Hookway and I disagree about precisely how to read Peirce's Neglected Argument, about exactly what Peirce is proposing to his readers in that article. I regard Peirce's recommendation of musement as supplying both the rubrics for a certain kind of experiment and as the desciption of a certain type of exercise in reading and rereading.
引用
收藏
页码：485 / 495
页数：11
相关论文
共 50 条
12345