Does the Heterogeneity of Project Implementers Affect the Programme Participation of Beneficiaries?: Evidence from Rural Cambodia

被引:2
|
作者
Wakano, Ayako [1 ]
Yamada, Hiroyuki [2 ]
Shimamoto, Daichi [3 ]
机构
[1] Osaka Univ, Grad Sch Econ, 1-7 Machikaneyama, Toyonaka, Osaka 5600043, Japan
[2] Keio Univ, Fac Econ, Tokyo, Japan
[3] Waseda Univ, Waseda Inst Polit Econ, Tokyo, Japan
来源
JOURNAL OF DEVELOPMENT STUDIES | 2017年 / 53卷 / 01期
关键词
SOCIAL PREFERENCES; IMPURE ALTRUISM; ECONOMICS; FIELD; INCENTIVES; DECISIONS; DONATIONS; NETWORKS; BEHAVIOR; WORLD;
D O I
10.1080/00220388.2016.1171847
中图分类号
F0 [经济学]; F1 [世界各国经济概况、经济史、经济地理]; C [社会科学总论];
学科分类号
0201 ; 020105 ; 03 ; 0303 ;
摘要
This study employs the dataset collected for the assessment of a post-harvest technology project in rural Cambodia and focuses on the heterogeneous preferences of project implementers, frequently overlooked in the literature on programme evaluation studies. We focus on the implementer effect' on the programme participation of the treated farmers. We demonstrate that the heterogeneous programme participation of ordinary farmers could be induced due to heterogeneity in the characteristics of the project staff. In particular, we indicate that the baseline altruism of the project staff, measured by the dictator game, consistently increases the participation rate and the number of participations in the training sessions of beneficiaries. This type of heterogeneity in project staffs' preferences across treatment sites could be a source of treatment heterogeneity for programmes conducted at a certain cluster level. While few studies have focused on the heterogeneity of programme implementers, our empirical results indicate that the preference of implementers could be a source of treatment heterogeneity and imply the importance of implementation of an actual project.
引用
收藏
页码:49 / 67
页数:19
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [21] Does participation in CSA affect consciousness and sustainable behavior of consumers? The evidence from a longitudinal study
    Glinska-Newes, Aldona
    Brzustewicz, Pawel
    Escher, Iwona
    Fu, Yusheng
    Singh, Anupam
    FOOD QUALITY AND PREFERENCE, 2025, 127
  • [22] Does birth spacing affect female labor market participation? Evidence from urban China
    Pan, Zheng
    Jiang, Xiandeng
    Zhao, Ningru
    CHINA ECONOMIC REVIEW, 2021, 68
  • [23] Does Welfare Participation Affect Adolescent Educational Aspiration? Evidence from Panel Data in China
    Huo, Xuan
    Han, Huawei
    Gao, Qin
    CHILD INDICATORS RESEARCH, 2023, 16 (03) : 1171 - 1202
  • [24] How does perceptions of social justice affect farmers' political participation?-Evidence from China
    He, Zijian
    PLOS ONE, 2023, 18 (12):
  • [25] Does participation in mining activities affect the profitability of food crops production? Evidence from Ghana
    Wongnaa, Camillus Abawiera
    Kudzinawu, Christopher
    Nti, Emmanuel Kwame
    Babu, Suresh
    MINERAL ECONOMICS, 2024, 37 (04) : 771 - 786
  • [26] Does Welfare Participation Affect Adolescent Educational Aspiration? Evidence from Panel Data in China
    Xuan Huo
    Huawei Han
    Qin Gao
    Child Indicators Research, 2023, 16 : 1171 - 1202
  • [27] Does Welfare Participation Improve Life Satisfaction? Evidence from Panel Data in Rural China
    Huawei Han
    Qin Gao
    Journal of Happiness Studies, 2020, 21 : 1795 - 1822
  • [28] Does Welfare Participation Improve Life Satisfaction? Evidence from Panel Data in Rural China
    Han, Huawei
    Gao, Qin
    JOURNAL OF HAPPINESS STUDIES, 2020, 21 (05) : 1795 - 1822
  • [29] Does household participation in food markets increase dietary diversity? Evidence from rural Malawi
    Matita, Mirriam
    Chirwa, Ephraim W.
    Johnston, Deborah
    Mazalale, Jacob
    Smith, Richard
    Walls, Helen
    GLOBAL FOOD SECURITY-AGRICULTURE POLICY ECONOMICS AND ENVIRONMENT, 2021, 28
  • [30] Does User Participation Lead to Sense of Ownership for Rural Water Systems? Evidence from Kenya
    Marks, Sara J.
    Davis, Jennifer
    WORLD DEVELOPMENT, 2012, 40 (08) : 1569 - 1576