Aggregation of Interacting Criteria in Land Combat Vehicle Selection by Using Fuzzy Measures

被引:5
|
作者
Beliakov, Gleb [1 ]
Cao, Thang [2 ]
Mak-Hau, Vicky [1 ]
机构
[1] Deakin Univ, Sch Informat Technol, Geelong, Vic 3220, Australia
[2] Dept Def, Joint & Operat Anal Div, Def Sci & Technol Grp, Canberra, ACT 2610, Australia
关键词
Optimization; Force; Australia; Numerical models; Investment; Indexes; Numerical simulation; Capacity; Choquet integral; dependent criteria; fuzzy measure; multicriteria decision-making (MCDM); MULTIOBJECTIVE OPTIMIZATION; PARETO SETS; INTERPOLATION; CAPACITIES; OPERATORS;
D O I
10.1109/TFUZZ.2021.3135972
中图分类号
TP18 [人工智能理论];
学科分类号
081104 ; 0812 ; 0835 ; 1405 ;
摘要
We address the problems of multiple criteria decision-making and multiobjective optimization in which the criteria are mutually dependent. A practical application of land combat vehicle selection and its potential extension to force design for Australian Defence is considered. The criteria dependencies are modeled and formalised using the theory of fuzzy measures. The main challenge is an exponentially large set of parameters that quantify all criteria interactions. We develop a number of strategies to 1) simplify the model construction and reduce the number of parameters; 2) elicit preferences from numerical simulations and from decision makers; and 3) translate these preferences into a fuzzy measure learning problem from unlabeled data. We formulate and test a mathematical programming problem to determine fuzzy measure parameters for a relatively large number of decision criteria.
引用
收藏
页码:3979 / 3989
页数:11
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [31] Fuzzy Aggregation for Rule Selection in Imbalanced Datasets Classification using Choquet Integral
    Abdellatif, Safa
    Ben Hassine, Mohamed Ali
    Ben Yahia, Sadok
    Bouzeghoub, Amel
    2018 IEEE INTERNATIONAL CONFERENCE ON FUZZY SYSTEMS (FUZZ-IEEE), 2018,
  • [32] An Extended Shapley TODIM Approach Using Novel Exponential Fuzzy Divergence Measures for Multi-Criteria Service Quality in Vehicle Insurance Firms
    Mishra, Arunodaya Raj
    Rani, Pratibha
    Mardani, Abbas
    Kumari, Reetu
    Zavadskas, Edmundas Kazimieras
    Kumar Sharma, Dilip
    SYMMETRY-BASEL, 2020, 12 (09):
  • [33] MULTI-CRITERIA UNIVERSITY SELECTION:FORMULATION AND IMPLEMENTATION USING A FUZZY AHP
    Negin Salimi
    Jafar Rezaei
    Journal of Systems Science and Systems Engineering, 2015, 24 (03) : 293 - 315
  • [34] Using fuzzy multiple criterion methods for fourth party logistics criteria selection
    Cheng, Jao-Hong
    Chen, Shiuann-Shuoh
    Chuang, Yu-Wei
    ADVANCES ON ARTIFICIAL INTELLIGENCE, KNOWLEDGE ENGINEERING AND DATA BASES, PROCEEDINGS, 2008, : 282 - +
  • [35] Finding theWeights of the Criteria in the Flight Selection Problem Using Fuzzy Linear Programming
    Akin, Erdem
    Oztaysi, Basar
    Kabak, Ozgur
    INTELLIGENT AND FUZZY SYSTEMS, VOL 2, INFUS 2024, 2024, 1089 : 411 - 419
  • [36] Multi-criteria university selection: Formulation and implementation using a fuzzy AHP
    Salimi, Negin
    Rezaei, Jafar
    JOURNAL OF SYSTEMS SCIENCE AND SYSTEMS ENGINEERING, 2015, 24 (03) : 293 - 315
  • [37] Prioritizing Green Supplier Selection Criteria using Fuzzy Analytical Network Process
    Galankashi, Masoud Rahiminezhad
    Chegeni, Ali
    Soleimanynanadegany, Amin
    Memari, Ashkan
    Anjomshoae, Ali
    Helmi, Syed Ahmad
    Dargi, Ahmad
    12TH GLOBAL CONFERENCE ON SUSTAINABLE MANUFACTURING - EMERGING POTENTIALS, 2015, 26 : 689 - 694
  • [38] Multi-criteria university selection: Formulation and implementation using a fuzzy AHP
    Negin Salimi
    Jafar Rezaei
    Journal of Systems Science and Systems Engineering, 2015, 24 : 293 - 315
  • [39] Selection of Commercially Available Electric Vehicle using Fuzzy AHP-MABAC
    Biswas T.K.
    Das M.C.
    Journal of The Institution of Engineers (India): Series C, 2019, 100 (03): : 531 - 537
  • [40] Evaluation of tanker vehicle selection using a novel hybrid fuzzy MCDM technique
    Görçün O.F.
    Senthil S.
    Küçükönder H.
    Decision Making: Applications in Management and Engineering, 2021, 4 (02): : 140 - 162