Technology and everyday functioning in people with intellectual disabilities: a Rasch analysis of the Everyday Technology Use Questionnaire (ETUQ)

被引:38
|
作者
Hallgren, M. [1 ,2 ,3 ]
Nygard, L. [1 ]
Kottorp, A. [1 ]
机构
[1] Karolinska Inst, Dept Neurobiol Care Sci & Soc, Div Occupat Therapy, Stockholm, Sweden
[2] County Council Vasterbotten, LSS, Disabil Serv Support According Act Concerning Sup, Lycksele, Sweden
[3] County Council Vasterbotten, LSS, Serv Persons Gertain Funct Impairments, Lycksele, Sweden
关键词
everyday technology; intellectual disability; occupational therapy; questionnaire; Rasch; PSYCHOMETRIC EVALUATION; PERFORMANCE;
D O I
10.1111/j.1365-2788.2011.01419.x
中图分类号
G76 [特殊教育];
学科分类号
040109 ;
摘要
Background As people with intellectual disabilities (ID) today live integrated in society and use different technological artefacts and services in their everyday life, more in-depth evaluation methods are crucial to detect strengths and limitations of their everyday technology use. The Everyday Technology Use Questionnaire (ETUQ) was originally designed to investigate the extent to which older adults with cognitive limitations can use the everyday technology that is of relevance to them. The purpose of this study was to explore and evaluate evidence of the validity of ETUQ among adult persons with ID. Methods The original 93-item ETUQ was used to interview 120 adult participants with ID, recruited from a region in northern Sweden. A Rasch model was used to analyse the psychometric properties of the rating scale, scale validity, person response validity and person separation. Results The ETUQ rating scale displayed sound psychometric properties when used with this sample. The goodness-of-fit statistics showed that 15 (16%) of the 93 items demonstrated higher values than expected. A step-by-step removal process of items not demonstrating fit to the model resulted in an ETUQ version with 46 items (49%) that met all the criteria for scale validity. Fifteen participants (12%), primarily with mild ID, still demonstrated a higher number of unexpected responses included in ETUQ. Conclusions The results of this study indicate that the ETUQ generates a valid measure of perceived difficulty in using everyday technology including adult persons with ID.
引用
收藏
页码:610 / 620
页数:11
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [31] Promoting physical activity in everyday life of people with intellectual disabilities: An intervention overview
    Nutsch, Niklas
    Bruland, Dirk
    Latteck, Anne-Dorte
    [J]. JOURNAL OF INTELLECTUAL DISABILITIES, 2022, 26 (04) : 990 - 1014
  • [32] Comparing everyday autonomy and adult identity in young people with and without intellectual disabilities
    Salt, Emily
    Jahoda, Andrew
    [J]. JOURNAL OF APPLIED RESEARCH IN INTELLECTUAL DISABILITIES, 2020, 33 (06) : 1318 - 1327
  • [33] Challenging "The Hands of Technology": An Analysis of Independent Living for People with Intellectual Disabilities
    Moya-Kohler, Joan
    Domenech, Miquel
    [J]. INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF ENVIRONMENTAL RESEARCH AND PUBLIC HEALTH, 2022, 19 (03)
  • [34] Stability of person ability measures in people with acquired brain injury in the use of everyday technology: the test-retest reliability of the Management of Everyday Technology Assessment (META)
    Malinowsky, Camilla
    Kassberg, Ann-Charlotte
    Larsson-Lund, Maria
    Kottorp, Anders
    [J]. DISABILITY AND REHABILITATION-ASSISTIVE TECHNOLOGY, 2016, 11 (05) : 395 - 399
  • [35] Urban Analysis and Smart Communities: An Approach to the Use of Technology in Everyday Mobility
    Severiche Maury, Zurisaddai De la Cruz
    Fernandez Vilas, Ana
    [J]. INGE CUC, 2015, 11 (01) : 9 - 24
  • [36] The development of a questionnaire to assess everyday multidomain cognitive functioning in people with Parkinson's disease: The Parkinson's disease everyday cognition questionnaire (PDECQ)
    McDonald, K. R.
    Poliakoff, E.
    Dick, J. P.
    Kellett, M. W.
    Crossman, A. R.
    [J]. MOVEMENT DISORDERS, 2010, 25 (07) : S322 - S322
  • [37] Access to and use of everyday technology among older people: An occupational justice issue - but for whom?
    Kottorp, Anders
    Nygard, Louise
    Hedman, Annicka
    Ohman, Annika
    Malinowsky, Camilla
    Rosenberg, Lena
    Lindqvist, Eva
    Ryd, Charlotta
    [J]. JOURNAL OF OCCUPATIONAL SCIENCE, 2016, 23 (03) : 382 - 388
  • [38] The Use of Technology by Adolescents With Intellectual and Developmental Disabilities
    Burke, Susan M.
    [J]. JOURNAL OF PEDIATRIC NURSING-NURSING CARE OF CHILDREN & FAMILIES, 2017, 37 : 134 - 135
  • [39] An Approach for the Provision of Assistive Technology for People with Intellectual Disabilities
    van der Pijl, Dick
    Verdonschot, Manon
    Adriaens, Leon
    [J]. CHALLENGES FOR ASSISTIVE TECHNOLOGY, 2007, 20 : 593 - 597
  • [40] Assistive technology supporting employability for people with intellectual disabilities
    Aspinall, A.
    [J]. JOURNAL OF APPLIED RESEARCH IN INTELLECTUAL DISABILITIES, 2006, 19 (03) : 269 - 269