Technology and everyday functioning in people with intellectual disabilities: a Rasch analysis of the Everyday Technology Use Questionnaire (ETUQ)

被引:38
|
作者
Hallgren, M. [1 ,2 ,3 ]
Nygard, L. [1 ]
Kottorp, A. [1 ]
机构
[1] Karolinska Inst, Dept Neurobiol Care Sci & Soc, Div Occupat Therapy, Stockholm, Sweden
[2] County Council Vasterbotten, LSS, Disabil Serv Support According Act Concerning Sup, Lycksele, Sweden
[3] County Council Vasterbotten, LSS, Serv Persons Gertain Funct Impairments, Lycksele, Sweden
关键词
everyday technology; intellectual disability; occupational therapy; questionnaire; Rasch; PSYCHOMETRIC EVALUATION; PERFORMANCE;
D O I
10.1111/j.1365-2788.2011.01419.x
中图分类号
G76 [特殊教育];
学科分类号
040109 ;
摘要
Background As people with intellectual disabilities (ID) today live integrated in society and use different technological artefacts and services in their everyday life, more in-depth evaluation methods are crucial to detect strengths and limitations of their everyday technology use. The Everyday Technology Use Questionnaire (ETUQ) was originally designed to investigate the extent to which older adults with cognitive limitations can use the everyday technology that is of relevance to them. The purpose of this study was to explore and evaluate evidence of the validity of ETUQ among adult persons with ID. Methods The original 93-item ETUQ was used to interview 120 adult participants with ID, recruited from a region in northern Sweden. A Rasch model was used to analyse the psychometric properties of the rating scale, scale validity, person response validity and person separation. Results The ETUQ rating scale displayed sound psychometric properties when used with this sample. The goodness-of-fit statistics showed that 15 (16%) of the 93 items demonstrated higher values than expected. A step-by-step removal process of items not demonstrating fit to the model resulted in an ETUQ version with 46 items (49%) that met all the criteria for scale validity. Fifteen participants (12%), primarily with mild ID, still demonstrated a higher number of unexpected responses included in ETUQ. Conclusions The results of this study indicate that the ETUQ generates a valid measure of perceived difficulty in using everyday technology including adult persons with ID.
引用
收藏
页码:610 / 620
页数:11
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [1] Gender and diagnostic impact on everyday technology use: a differential item functioning (DIF) analysis of the Everyday Technology Use Questionnaire (ETUQ)
    Kottorp, Anders
    Malinowsky, Camilla
    Larsson-Lund, Maria
    Nygard, Louise
    [J]. DISABILITY AND REHABILITATION, 2019, 41 (22) : 2688 - 2694
  • [2] Use of everyday technology to promote ambulation in people with intellectual and multiple disabilities
    Lancioni, Giulio E.
    Singh, Nirbhay N.
    O'Reilly, Mark F.
    Sigafoos, Jeff
    Alberti, Gloria
    Chiariello, Valeria
    Desideri, Lorenzo
    [J]. TECHNOLOGY AND DISABILITY, 2021, 33 (03) : 229 - 236
  • [3] A transactional perspective on the everyday use of technology by people with learning disabilities
    Barlott, Tim
    MacKenzie, Paige
    Le Goullon, Damian
    Campbell, Liam
    Setchell, Jenny
    [J]. JOURNAL OF OCCUPATIONAL SCIENCE, 2023, 30 (02) : 218 - 234
  • [4] Test-retest reliability of the short version of the everyday technology use questionnaire (S-ETUQ)
    Malinowsky, Camilla
    Nygard, Louise
    Pantzar, Monica
    Kottorp, Anders
    [J]. SCANDINAVIAN JOURNAL OF OCCUPATIONAL THERAPY, 2020, 27 (08) : 567 - 576
  • [5] Everyday Technology to Support Leisure and Daily Activities in People with Intellectual and Other Disabilities
    Lancioni, Giulio E.
    Singh, Nirbhay N.
    O'Reilly, Mark F.
    Sigafoos, Jeff
    Alberti, Gloria
    Chiariello, Valeria
    Carrella, Luigina
    [J]. DEVELOPMENTAL NEUROREHABILITATION, 2020, 23 (07) : 431 - 438
  • [6] Validation of the Everyday Technology Use Questionnaire in a Japanese context
    Malinowsky, Camilla
    Kottorp, Anders
    Tanemura, Rumi
    Asaba, Eric
    Nagao, Toru
    Noda, Kazue
    Sagara, Jiro
    Bontje, Peter
    Rosenberg, Lena
    Nygard, Louise
    [J]. HONG KONG JOURNAL OF OCCUPATIONAL THERAPY, 2015, 26 : 1 - 8
  • [7] The perceived challenge of everyday technologies in Sweden, the United States and England: Exploring differential item functioning in the everyday technology use questionnaire
    Wallcook, Sarah
    Malinowsky, Camilla
    Nygard, Louise
    Charlesworth, Georgina
    Lee, Jenica
    Walsh, Ryan
    Gaber, Sophie
    Kottorp, Anders
    [J]. SCANDINAVIAN JOURNAL OF OCCUPATIONAL THERAPY, 2020, 27 (08) : 554 - 566
  • [8] Neuropsychological predictors of everyday functioning in adults with intellectual disabilities
    Su, C. -Y.
    Chen, C. -C.
    Wuang, Y. P.
    Lin, Y. -H.
    Wu, Y. -Y.
    [J]. JOURNAL OF INTELLECTUAL DISABILITY RESEARCH, 2008, 52 : 18 - 28
  • [9] Everyday Technology Use Questionnaire: Psychometric Evaluation of a New Assessment of Competence in Technology Use
    Rosenberg, Lena
    Nygard, Louise
    Kottorp, Anders
    [J]. OTJR-OCCUPATION PARTICIPATION AND HEALTH, 2009, 29 (02) : 52 - 62
  • [10] Perceived difficulty in the use of everyday technology: relationships with everyday functioning in people with acquired brain injury with a special focus on returning to work
    Lund, Maria Larsson
    Nygard, Louise
    Kottorp, Anders
    [J]. DISABILITY AND REHABILITATION, 2014, 36 (19) : 1618 - 1625