Endoscopic ultrasound-guided fine needle aspiration biopsy of patients with suspected pancreatic cancer: Diagnostic accuracy and acute and 30-day complications

被引:315
|
作者
Eloubeidi, MA
Chen, VK
Eltoum, IA
Jhala, D
Chhieng, DC
Jhala, N
Vickers, SM
Wilcox, CM
机构
[1] Univ Alabama Birmingham, Dept Med, Div Gastroenterol & Hepatol, Endoscop Ultrasound Program, Birmingham, AL 35294 USA
[2] Univ Alabama Birmingham, Dept Surg, Birmingham, AL 35294 USA
[3] Univ Alabama Birmingham, Dept Pathol, Birmingham, AL 35294 USA
来源
AMERICAN JOURNAL OF GASTROENTEROLOGY | 2003年 / 98卷 / 12期
关键词
D O I
10.1016/S0002-9270(03)01699-X
中图分类号
R57 [消化系及腹部疾病];
学科分类号
摘要
Objectives: The aims of this study were to evaluate the diagnostic accuracy of endoscopic ultrasound-guided fine needle aspiration (EUS-FNA) in patients with suspected pancreatic cancer, and to assess immediate, acute, and 30-day complications related to EUS-FNA. Methods: All patients with suspected pancreatic cancer were prospectively evaluated. A single gastroenterologist performed all EUS-FNAs in the presence of a cytopathologist. Immediate complications were evaluated in all patients. An experienced nurse called patients 24-72 h and 30 days after the procedure. Reference standard for the classification of the final diagnosis included: surgery (n=48), clinical or imaging follow-up (n=63), or death from the disease (n=47). Results: A total of 158 patients (mean age 62.3 yr) underwent EUS-FNA during the study period. The mean tumor size was 32 X 26 mm. The median number of passes was three (range one to 10). Of these patients, 44% had at least one failed attempt at tissue diagnosis before EUS-FNA. The sensitivity, specificity, PPV, NPV, and accuracy of EUS-FNA in solid pancreatic masses were 84.3%, 97%, 99%, 64%, and 84%, respectively. Immediate self-limited complications occurred in 10 of the 158 EUS-FNAs (6.3%). Of 90 patients contacted at 24-72 h, 78 patients (87%) responded. Of the 90 patients, 20 (22%) reported at least one symptom, all of which were minor except in three cases (one self-limited acute pancreatitis and two emergency room visits, one of which led to admission). In all, 83 patients were contacted at 30 days, and 82% responded. No additional or continued complications were reported. Conclusions: EUS-FNA is highly accurate in identifying patients with suspected pancreatic cancer, especially when other modalities have failed. Major complications after EUS-FNA are rare, and minor complications are similar to those reported for upper endoscopy. It seems that follow-up at 1 wk might capture all of the adverse events related to EUS-FNA.
引用
收藏
页码:2663 / 2668
页数:6
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [41] Complications of endoscopic ultrasound-guided fine-needle aspiration biopsy (EUS-FNAB) for pancreatic lesions
    Kenji Yamao
    Journal of Gastroenterology, 2005, 40 : 921 - 923
  • [42] Endoscopic ultrasonography - Guided fine-needle aspiration biopsy of suspected pancreatic cancer
    Gress, F
    Gottlieb, K
    Sherman, S
    Lehman, G
    ANNALS OF INTERNAL MEDICINE, 2001, 134 (06) : 459 - 464
  • [43] Endoscopic ultrasound-guided fine needle aspiration of pancreatic mass
    Najmi, Maleka
    Manivannan, Meenakshi
    Hakim, Nawar
    Gilani, Syed M.
    Manglik, Niti
    CYTOPATHOLOGY, 2021, 32 (01) : 144 - 145
  • [44] Ultrasound-guided vs endoscopic ultrasound-guided fine-needle aspiration for pancreatic cancer diagnosis
    Masato Matsuyama
    Hiroshi Ishii
    Kensuke Kuraoka
    Seigo Yukisawa
    Akiyoshi Kasuga
    Masato Ozaka
    Sho Suzuki
    Kouichi Takano
    Yuko Sugiyama
    Takao Itoi
    World Journal of Gastroenterology, 2013, (15) : 2368 - 2373
  • [45] Accuracy of endoscopic ultrasound-guided fine-needle aspiration in the suspicion of pancreatic metastases
    José Celso Ardengh
    César Vivian Lopes
    Rafael Kemp
    Filadélfio Venco
    Eder Rios de Lima-Filho
    José Sebastião dos Santos
    BMC Gastroenterology, 13
  • [46] Complications Associated With Endoscopic Ultrasound-Guided Fine Needle Aspiration of Solid Pancreatic Lesions
    Miwa, H.
    Sugimori, K.
    Ishii, T.
    Kaneko, T.
    Numata, K.
    Tanaka, K.
    Maeda, S.
    PANCREAS, 2014, 43 (08) : 1391 - 1392
  • [47] Ultrasound-guided vs endoscopic ultrasound-guided fine-needle aspiration for pancreatic cancer diagnosis
    Matsuyama, Masato
    Ishii, Hiroshi
    Kuraoka, Kensuke
    Yukisawa, Seigo
    Kasuga, Akiyoshi
    Ozaka, Masato
    Suzuki, Sho
    Takano, Kouichi
    Sugiyama, Yuko
    Itoi, Takao
    WORLD JOURNAL OF GASTROENTEROLOGY, 2013, 19 (15) : 2368 - 2373
  • [48] Endoscopic Ultrasound-Guided Fine Needle Aspiration As the Definitive Diagnostic Or Staging Study in Patients with Suspected Or Known Lung Cancer
    Gupta, Parantap
    Zwischenberger, Joseph B.
    Chaya, Charles T.
    Bhutani, Manoop S.
    GASTROINTESTINAL ENDOSCOPY, 2006, 63 (05) : AB276 - AB276
  • [49] Accuracy of endoscopic ultrasound-guided fine-needle aspiration in the suspicion of pancreatic metastases
    Ardengh, Jose Celso
    Lopes, Cesar Vivian
    Kemp, Rafael
    Venco, Filadelfio
    de Lima-Filho, Eder Rios
    dos Santos, Jose Sebastiao
    BMC GASTROENTEROLOGY, 2013, 13
  • [50] Current Concept of Endoscopic Ultrasound-Guided Fine Needle Aspiration for Pancreatic Cancer
    Mizuno, Nobumasa
    Hara, Kazuo
    Hijioka, Susumu
    Bhatia, Vikram
    Shimizu, Yasuhiro
    Yatabe, Yasushi
    Yamao, Kenji
    PANCREATOLOGY, 2011, 11 : 40 - 46