Goodness-of-Fit of Conditional Regression Models for Multiple Imputation

被引:2
|
作者
Cabras, Stefano [1 ]
Eugenia Castellanos, Maria [1 ]
Quiros, Alicia [1 ]
机构
[1] Univ Cagliari, Dipartimento Matemat & Informat, I-09124 Cagliari, Italy
来源
BAYESIAN ANALYSIS | 2011年 / 6卷 / 03期
关键词
Calibrated posterior predictive p-value; Discrepancy measure; Minimum training sample; Missing at random; Predictive distribution; Sequential regression multiple imputation; P-VALUES; CHECKING;
D O I
10.1214/ba/1339616471
中图分类号
O1 [数学];
学科分类号
0701 ; 070101 ;
摘要
We propose the calibrated posterior predictive p-value (cppp) as an interpretable goodness-of-fit (GOP) measure for regression models in sequential regression multiple imputation (SRMI). The cppp is uniformly distributed under the assumed model, while the posterior predictive p-value (ppp) is not in general and in particular when the percentage of missing data, pm, increases. Uniformity of cppp allows the analyst to evaluate properly the evidence against the assumed model. We show the advantages of cppp over ppp in terms of power in detecting common departures from the assumed model and, more importantly, in terms of robustness with respect to pm. In the imputation phase, which provides a complete database for general statistical analyses, default and improper priors are usually needed, whereas the cppp requires a proper prior on regression parameters. We avoid this problem by introducing the use of a minimum training sample that turns the improper prior into a proper distribution. The dependency on the training sample is naturally accounted for by changing the training sample at each step of the SRMI. Our results come from theoretical considerations together with simulation studies and an application to a real data set of anthropometric measures.
引用
收藏
页码:429 / 456
页数:28
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [21] A Goodness-of-Fit Test for a Class of Autoregressive Conditional Duration Models
    Perera, Indeewara
    Hidalgo, Javier
    Silvapulle, Mervyn J.
    [J]. ECONOMETRIC REVIEWS, 2016, 35 (06) : 1111 - 1141
  • [22] On the conditional distribution of goodness-of-fit tests
    O'Reilly, F
    Gracia-Medrano, L
    [J]. COMMUNICATIONS IN STATISTICS-THEORY AND METHODS, 2006, 35 (03) : 541 - 549
  • [23] Goodness-of-fit test for monotonous nonlinear regression models.
    Fontez, B
    Ducharme, GR
    [J]. COMPTES RENDUS MATHEMATIQUE, 2004, 338 (04) : 317 - 320
  • [24] A goodness-of-fit test for regression models with spatially correlated errors
    Meilan-Vila, Andrea
    Opsomer, Jean D.
    Francisco-Fernandez, Mario
    Crujeiras, Rosa M.
    [J]. TEST, 2020, 29 (03) : 728 - 749
  • [25] Rejoinder on: An updated review of Goodness-of-Fit tests for regression models
    Wenceslao González-Manteiga
    Rosa M. Crujeiras
    [J]. TEST, 2013, 22 : 442 - 447
  • [26] On Graphically Checking Goodness-of-fit of Binary Logistic Regression Models
    Gillmann, G.
    Minder, C. E.
    [J]. METHODS OF INFORMATION IN MEDICINE, 2009, 48 (03) : 306 - 310
  • [27] Testing goodness-of-fit for nonlinear regression models with heterogeneous variances
    Caouder, N
    Huet, S
    [J]. COMPUTATIONAL STATISTICS & DATA ANALYSIS, 1997, 23 (04) : 491 - 507
  • [28] Comments on: An updated review of Goodness-of-Fit tests for regression models
    Simos G. Meintanis
    [J]. TEST, 2013, 22 : 432 - 436
  • [29] A comprehensive comparison of goodness-of-fit tests for logistic regression models
    Liu, Huiling
    Li, Xinmin
    Chen, Feifei
    Haerdle, Wolfgang
    Liang, Hua
    [J]. STATISTICS AND COMPUTING, 2024, 34 (05)
  • [30] Global goodness-of-fit tests for group testing regression models
    Chen, Peng
    Tebbs, Joshua M.
    Bilder, Christopher R.
    [J]. STATISTICS IN MEDICINE, 2009, 28 (23) : 2912 - 2928