Does dropping day 5 PEP follow-up affect outcomes? An audit of HIV post-exposure prophylaxis at a central London sexual health clinic

被引:0
|
作者
O'Keeffe, C. [1 ]
Nwokolo, N. [1 ]
McOwan, A. [1 ]
Whitlock, G. [1 ]
机构
[1] Chelsea & Westminster Hosp NHS Fdn Trust, London W1D 6AQ, England
关键词
High-risk behaviour; HIV; AIDS; treatment; prevention; post-exposure prophylaxis; PEP; follow-up; audit;
D O I
10.1177/0956462414547090
中图分类号
R392 [医学免疫学]; Q939.91 [免疫学];
学科分类号
100102 ;
摘要
UK post-exposure prophylaxis (PEP) guidelines were updated by the British Association for Sexual Health and HIV (BASHH) in 2011. In 2013, we changed policy to omit day 5 PEP follow-up at 56 Dean Street as it was felt clinically unnecessary. This audit compares our performance against BASHH standards for PEP attenders during June 2012 and June 2013. We identified 162 PEP prescriptions; PEP assessment and appropriate sexually transmitted infection testing was done well. PEP completion rates and post-PEP HIV testing were lower than BASHH standards. Following omission of day 5 review, documentation that results have been checked was poor; however, attendance at follow-up was not adversely affected.
引用
收藏
页码:590 / 592
页数:3
相关论文
共 21 条
  • [21] Interim position statement on doxycycline post-exposure prophylaxis (Doxy-PEP) for the prevention of bacterial sexually transmissible infections in Australia and Aotearoa New Zealand - the Australasian Society for HIV, Viral Hepatitis and Sexual Health Medicine (ASHM)
    Cornelisse, Vincent J.
    Ong, Jason J.
    Ryder, Nathan
    Ooi, Catriona
    Wong, Arthur
    Kenchington, Penny
    Giola, Massimo
    Donovan, Basil
    Dean, Judith A.
    Molina, Jean-Michel
    Medland, Nicholas A.
    [J]. SEXUAL HEALTH, 2023, 20 (02) : 99 - 104