Varieties of agri-environmental schemes in China: A quantitative assessment

被引:0
|
作者
Zhu, Lanlan [1 ]
Zhang, Chunman [2 ]
Cai, Yinying [1 ]
机构
[1] Huazhong Agr Univ, Dept Publ Adm, Wuhan, Hubei, Peoples R China
[2] Johns Hopkins Univ, Dept Polit Sci, Baltimore, MD 21218 USA
基金
中国国家自然科学基金;
关键词
Agri-environmental scheme; China; Quantitative analyses; Policy development; ECOLOGICAL EFFECTIVENESS; CONSERVATION EASEMENTS; FARMERS PARTICIPATION; ECOSYSTEM SERVICES; PROTECTION SCHEME; COSTA-RICA; FARMLAND; PAYMENTS; BEHAVIOR; PROGRAM;
D O I
暂无
中图分类号
X [环境科学、安全科学];
学科分类号
08 ; 0830 ;
摘要
Agri-environmental schemes have become an effective policy measure to prompt farmers to protect rural farmland and landscapes. In recent years, 17 provincial governments including Sichuan, Jiangsu, Shanghai, Guangxi and Guangdong have shown increasing interest in promoting local experimentation with agri-enviromnental schemes. Based on two waves of farmer survey data in Eastern, Middle and Western China conducted in 2012 and 2015, this paper conducts a comparative study of three agricultural environmental policy models: the farmland protection fund model in Chengdu city (the Chengdu model), the farmland eco-compensation model in Suzhou city (the Suzhou model), and the conventional farmland protection model in Wuhan (the Wuhan model). Our quantitative analyses show that: agri-environmental schemes in China have significantly enhanced farmer enthusiasm toward farmland protection and lifted their policy satisfaction. Yet, the improvement in farmer knowledge of farmland ecological functions is limited; different agri-environmental models have diverse policy effects. Overall, the Chengdu model characterized by a combination of pension insurance and agricultural insurance benefits works better than the Suzhou model. Farmer participation in rural farmland and landscape protection is affected by multiple factors, among which education is the most significant.
引用
下载
收藏
页码:505 / 517
页数:13
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [21] Agri-environmental Schemes Require Improved Design for Better Outcomes
    Nguyen, Chi
    Latacz-Lohmann, Uwe
    Hanley, Nick
    EUROCHOICES, 2024,
  • [22] Implementation and acceptance of agri-environmental schemes in the EU member states
    Deblitz, C
    Buller, H
    Rohm, O
    Schramek, J
    Wilson, GA
    BERICHTE UBER LANDWIRTSCHAFT, 1998, 76 (01): : 55 - 73
  • [23] Using choice experiments to improve the design of agri-environmental schemes
    Latacz-Lohmann, Uwe
    Breustedt, Gunnar
    EUROPEAN REVIEW OF AGRICULTURAL ECONOMICS, 2019, 46 (03) : 495 - 528
  • [24] Payments by modelled results: A novel design for agri-environmental schemes
    Bartkowski, Bartosz
    Droste, Nils
    Liess, Mareike
    Sidemo-Holm, William
    Weller, Ulrich
    Brady, Mark, V
    LAND USE POLICY, 2021, 102
  • [25] Measuring private transaction costs of European agri-environmental schemes
    Mettepenningen, Evy
    Verspecht, Ann
    Van Huylenbroeck, Guido
    JOURNAL OF ENVIRONMENTAL PLANNING AND MANAGEMENT, 2009, 52 (05) : 649 - 667
  • [26] Farmer collectives for more effective agri-environmental schemes? An assessment framework based on the concept of 'professionalization'
    Dik, L.
    Runhaar, H. A. C.
    Termeer, C. J. A. M.
    INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF AGRICULTURAL SUSTAINABILITY, 2022, 20 (04) : 543 - 557
  • [27] Canada's environmental farm plans: transatlantic perspectives on agri-environmental schemes
    Robinson, Guy M.
    GEOGRAPHICAL JOURNAL, 2006, 172 : 206 - 218
  • [28] Effects on participation and biodiversity of reforming the implementation of agri-environmental schemes in the Netherlands
    Groeneveld, A. N.
    Peerlings, J. H. M.
    Bakker, M. M.
    Polman, N. B. P.
    Heijman, W. J. M.
    ECOLOGICAL COMPLEXITY, 2019, 40
  • [29] Assessment of Agri-Environmental Externalities at Regional Levels in Finland
    Chen, Qiuzhen
    Sipilainen, Timo
    Sumelius, John
    SUSTAINABILITY, 2014, 6 (06) : 3171 - 3191
  • [30] Integrating different understandings of landscape stewardship into the design of agri-environmental schemes
    Raymond, Christopher M.
    Reed, Mark
    Bieling, Claudia
    Robinson, Guy M.
    Plieninger, Tobias
    ENVIRONMENTAL CONSERVATION, 2016, 43 (04) : 350 - 358