Review The ideal flap for reconstruction of circumferential pharyngeal defects: A systematic review and meta-analysis of surgical outcomes

被引:12
|
作者
Bouhadana, Gabriel [1 ]
Azzi, Alain J. [2 ]
Gilardino, Mirko S. [2 ]
机构
[1] McGill Univ, Fac Med, Montreal, PQ, Canada
[2] McGill Univ, Div Plast & Reconstruct Surg, Montreal, PQ H3G 1A4, Canada
关键词
Pharyngeal reconstruction; Free flaps; Microsurgery; Outcomes; ANTEROLATERAL THIGH FLAP; FREE JEJUNAL TRANSFER; FASCIOCUTANEOUS FREE-FLAP; RADIAL FOREARM; PHARYNGOESOPHAGEAL RECONSTRUCTION; HYPOPHARYNGEAL RECONSTRUCTION; FUNCTIONAL OUTCOMES; ESOPHAGEAL RECONSTRUCTION; SWALLOWING OUTCOMES; PHARYNGOLARYNGECTOMY;
D O I
10.1016/j.bjps.2021.03.042
中图分类号
R61 [外科手术学];
学科分类号
摘要
Background: There is a lack of consensus regarding the superiority of the common free flaps for the reconstruction of circumferential pharyngeal defects. Methods: A systematic literature search was conducted to identify studies reporting the complications of circumferential pharyngeal reconstruction between 2005 and 2020. Anterolateral thigh free flaps (ALTFF), jejunal free flaps (JFF), and radial forearm free flaps (RFFF) were compared. Various complications were compared by meta-analysis. Primary endpoints were fistula and stricture rates. Results: Forty studies were included (2230 patients). Stricture rate was similarly low with tubed ALTFF (13.3%, n = 36/270) and JFF (13.2%, n = 176/1334). Fistula rate was the lowest with JFF (9.2%, n = 58/634). ALTFF was associated with the lowest rates of partial and complete flap failure (3.8%, n = 6/157, and 2.8%, n = 5/178), infection (2.8%, n = 3/106), donor site morbidity (3.9%, n = 5/130), and mortality (0%, n = 0/101) within 30 days. A meta-analysis demonstrated that there was no statistically significant difference in stricture and fistula rates between ALTFF and JFF. Moreover, JFF was associated with a significantly lower fistula rate than that of RFFF ( p < 0.001). ALTFF was associated with a significantly lower infection rate than that of JFF ( p = 0.013). Conclusions: The data suggest the use of ALTFF for circumferential pharyngeal defects. In the absence of randomized, prospective data, the authors hope the results presented can be used as an evidence-based reference. (c) 2021 British Association of Plastic, Reconstructive and Aesthetic Surgeons. Published by Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.
引用
收藏
页码:1779 / 1790
页数:12
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [41] Surgical margins and outcomes for eyelid melanoma: a systematic review and meta-analysis
    Pisano, Catherine E.
    Trager, Megan H.
    Fan, Weijia
    Samie, Faramarz H.
    ARCHIVES OF DERMATOLOGICAL RESEARCH, 2024, 316 (04)
  • [42] Surgical Outcomes in Brainstem Arteriovenous Malformations: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis
    Khahera, Anadjeet Singh
    Ogunsola, Oludotun
    Sim, Justin
    Clarke, Alison
    Connolly, E. Sander
    NEUROSURGERY, 2019, 66 : 148 - 149
  • [43] Surgical Management for Complete Atrioventricular Septal Defects: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis
    Wu, Yuhao
    Kuang, Hongyu
    Wang, Gang
    Dai, Jiangtao
    Li, Yonggang
    Wei, Guanghui
    Wu, Chun
    PEDIATRIC CARDIOLOGY, 2020, 41 (07) : 1445 - 1457
  • [44] Ideal Fertility in Iran: A Systematic Review and Meta-analysis
    Nasrabad, Hajiieh Bibi Razeghi
    Abbasi-Shavazi, Mohammad Jalal
    INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF WOMENS HEALTH AND REPRODUCTION SCIENCES, 2020, 8 (01): : 10 - 18
  • [45] Surgical Management for Complete Atrioventricular Septal Defects: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis
    Yuhao Wu
    Hongyu Kuang
    Gang Wang
    Jiangtao Dai
    Yonggang Li
    Guanghui Wei
    Chun Wu
    Pediatric Cardiology, 2020, 41 : 1445 - 1457
  • [46] Effectiveness of Nasolabial Flap Versus Paramedian Forehead Flap for Nasal Reconstruction: A Systematic Review and Meta-analysis
    Chakraborty S.S.
    Goel A.D.
    Sahu R.K.
    Midya M.
    Acharya S.
    Shakrawal N.
    Aesthetic Plastic Surgery, 2023, 47 (1) : 313 - 329
  • [47] Effectiveness of Nasolabial Flap Versus Paramedian Forehead Flap for Nasal Reconstruction: A Systematic Review and Meta-analysis
    Chakraborty, Sourabh Shankar
    Goel, Akhil Dhanesh
    Sahu, Ranjit Kumar
    Midya, Manojit
    Acharya, Sudeshna
    Shakrawal, Neha
    AESTHETIC PLASTIC SURGERY, 2023, 47 (01) : 313 - 329
  • [48] Enhanced Recovery Pathways for Flap-Based Reconstruction: Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis
    Yan Yu Tan
    Frank Liaw
    Robert Warner
    Simon Myers
    Ali Ghanem
    Aesthetic Plastic Surgery, 2021, 45 : 2096 - 2115
  • [49] Management of Flap Failure After Head and Neck Reconstruction: A Systematic Review and Meta-analysis
    Walia, Amit
    Lee, Jake J.
    Jackson, Ryan S.
    Hardi, Angela C.
    Bollig, Craig A.
    Graboyes, Evan M.
    Zenga, Joseph
    Puram, Sidharth V.
    Pipkorn, Patrik
    OTOLARYNGOLOGY-HEAD AND NECK SURGERY, 2022, 167 (02) : 224 - 235
  • [50] FAMM flap in oral cavity and tongue defect reconstruction: A systematic review and meta-analysis
    Mattey, Luke R.
    Reyes, Daniella
    Rehman, Umar
    Gohari, Shireen S.
    Sarwar, Mohammad Sohaib
    Brennan, Peter A.
    JOURNAL OF PLASTIC RECONSTRUCTIVE AND AESTHETIC SURGERY, 2025, 102 : 75 - 92