A progressive entrainment runout model for debris flow analysis and Check for its application

被引:13
|
作者
Kang, Chao [1 ]
Chan, Dave [1 ,2 ]
机构
[1] Univ Alberta, Dept Civil & Environm Engn, Edmonton, AB T6G 2R3, Canada
[2] Three Gorges Univ, China Coll Civil Engn & Architecture, Yichang 443003, Hubei, Peoples R China
基金
加拿大自然科学与工程研究理事会;
关键词
Debris flow; Entrainment; Tsingshan debris flow; Runout modeling; Landslides; granular flow; ELEMENT METHOD; BED; LANDSLIDES; PRESSURE; BEHAVIOR; SLIDES; AREA;
D O I
10.1016/j.geomorph.2018.09.003
中图分类号
P9 [自然地理学];
学科分类号
0705 ; 070501 ;
摘要
A progressive entrainment model has been incorporated into an energy-based runout model to calculate the kinematic characteristics of debris flow. The progressive entrainment model considers both rolling and sliding motions of erodible material. To study the effect of the controlling parameters in the entrainment model, sensitivity analyses have been carried out by varying model parameters such as the internal friction angle of the debris, the basal friction angle of the channel, the turbulent flow coefficient, and the mean value of the probabilistic density function (PDF) for the resting angle. The results are evaluated by calculating the change of the maximum entrainment rate, the maximum frontal velocity, the final total volume, the longitudinal length of deposition, the maximum debris flow height, and the runout distance of the debris. The progressive entrainment runout model is sensitive to the characteristic particle size, basal friction angle and turbulent coefficient. Measurements from the 1990 Tsingshan debris flow, Hong Kong, China, are used to validate the model. Velocities at different channel sections estimated using the super-elevation method and entrainment depth are used to evaluate the simulation results. Comparing the results between simulated and observed maximum velocity and entrainment depth indicate that the progressive entrainment model together with the runout model can capture the erosion characteristics of the granular material. The results are also compared with that using a dynamic entrainment model. The results demonstrate that the progressive entrainment model provides a more realistic calculation of entrainment for this case compared with the dynamic entrainment model. (C) 2018 Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.
引用
收藏
页码:25 / 40
页数:16
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [21] Post-wildfire debris-flow runout mapping using geospatial analysis
    Praskievicz, Sarah
    Sigdel, Rajesh
    NATURAL HAZARDS, 2024, 120 (13) : 12545 - 12558
  • [22] A numerical simulation of debris flow and its application
    Shieh, CL
    Jan, CD
    Tsai, YF
    NATURAL HAZARDS, 1996, 13 (01) : 39 - 54
  • [23] Analysis of debris flow surges using the theory of uniformly progressive flow
    Hungr, O
    EARTH SURFACE PROCESSES AND LANDFORMS, 2000, 25 (05) : 483 - 495
  • [24] Optimizing and validating the Gravitational Process Path model for regional debris-flow runout modelling
    Goetz, Jason
    Kohrs, Robin
    Hormazabal, Eric Parra
    Morales, Manuel Bustos
    Riquelme, Maria Belen Araneda
    Henriquez, Cristian
    Brenning, Alexander
    NATURAL HAZARDS AND EARTH SYSTEM SCIENCES, 2021, 21 (08) : 2543 - 2562
  • [25] Runout analysis of a potential debris flow in the Dongwopu gully based on a well-balanced numerical model over complex topography
    Han, Xudong
    Chen, Jianping
    Xu, Peihua
    Niu, Cencen
    Zhan, Jiewei
    BULLETIN OF ENGINEERING GEOLOGY AND THE ENVIRONMENT, 2018, 77 (02) : 679 - 689
  • [26] Runout analysis of a potential debris flow in the Dongwopu gully based on a well-balanced numerical model over complex topography
    Xudong Han
    Jianping Chen
    Peihua Xu
    Cencen Niu
    Jiewei Zhan
    Bulletin of Engineering Geology and the Environment, 2018, 77 : 679 - 689
  • [27] Simulation analysis of dynamic process of debris flow based on different entrainment models
    Wu Feng-yuan
    Fan Yun-yun
    Chen Jian-ping
    Li Jun
    ROCK AND SOIL MECHANICS, 2019, 40 (08) : 3236 - 3246
  • [28] Application of two layer simulation model for unifying debris flow and sediment sheet flow and its improvement
    Takahama, J
    Fujita, Y
    Hachiya, K
    Yoshino, K
    DEBRIS-FLOW HAZARDS MITIGATION: MECHANICS, PREDICTION, AND ASSESSMENT, VOLS 1 AND 2, 2003, : 515 - 526
  • [29] SPH model for fluid–structure interaction and its application to debris flow impact estimation
    Zili Dai
    Yu Huang
    Hualin Cheng
    Qiang Xu
    Landslides, 2017, 14 : 917 - 928
  • [30] Predicting Debris Flow Runout with SFLOW Model: Case Study of Datong and Taicun Gullies, Lijiang, China
    Mehmood, Qaiser
    Qing, Wang
    Chen, Jianping
    Rahman, Gohar
    GEOTECHNICAL AND GEOLOGICAL ENGINEERING, 2025, 43 (01)