A comparison between methods to compute Lyapunov exponents

被引:89
|
作者
Tancredi, G
Sánchez, A
Roig, F
机构
[1] Univ Republica, Fac Ciencias, Dept Astron, Montevideo 11400, Uruguay
[2] Univ Sao Paulo, Inst Astron & Geofis, BR-04301904 Sao Paulo, Brazil
来源
ASTRONOMICAL JOURNAL | 2001年 / 121卷 / 02期
关键词
methods : numerical; solar system : general;
D O I
10.1086/318732
中图分类号
P1 [天文学];
学科分类号
0704 ;
摘要
Lyapunov characteristic exponents measure the rate of exponential divergence between neighboring trajectories in the phase space. For a given autonomous dynamical system, the maximum Lyapunov characteristic exponent (hereafter LCE) is computed from the solution of the variational equations of the system. There are many dynamical systems in which the formulation and solution of the variational equations is a cumbersome task. In those cases an alternative procedure, first introduced by Benettin et al., is to replace the variational solution by computing two neighbor trajectories (the test particle and its shadow) and calculating the mutual distance. In this paper, we deal with a comparison between these two different techniques for the calculation of LCE: the variational method and the two-particle method. We point out a problem that can appear when the two-particle method is used, which can lead to a false estimation of a positive LCE. The explanation of this phenomenon can be analyzed in two different situations: (1) for relatively large initial separations the two-particle method is not a good approximation to the solution of the variational equations, and (2) for small initial separations the two-particle method have problems related to the machine precision, even when the separation can be many order of magnitudes larger than the machine precision. We show some examples of false estimates of the LCE that have already appeared in the literature using the two-particle method, and finally we present some suggestions to be taken into account when this method has to be used.
引用
收藏
页码:1171 / 1179
页数:9
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [21] Lyapunov exponents for the differences between quantum and classical dynamics
    Ballentine, L.E.
    Physical Review A - Atomic, Molecular, and Optical Physics, 2001, 63 (02): : 024101 - 024101
  • [22] On the relation between Lyapunov exponents and exponential decay of correlations
    Slipantschuk, Julia
    Bandtlow, Oscar F.
    Just, Wolfram
    JOURNAL OF PHYSICS A-MATHEMATICAL AND THEORETICAL, 2013, 46 (07)
  • [23] LYAPUNOV EXPONENTS - A SURVEY
    ARNOLD, L
    WIHSTUTZ, V
    LECTURE NOTES IN MATHEMATICS, 1986, 1186 : 1 - 26
  • [24] STABILITY OF LYAPUNOV EXPONENTS
    LEDRAPPIER, F
    YOUNG, LS
    ERGODIC THEORY AND DYNAMICAL SYSTEMS, 1991, 11 : 469 - 484
  • [25] On quantum Lyapunov exponents
    Majewski, Wladyslaw A.
    Marciniak, Marcin
    JOURNAL OF PHYSICS A-MATHEMATICAL AND GENERAL, 2006, 39 (31): : L523 - L528
  • [26] Differentiability of Lyapunov Exponents
    Ferraiol, Thiago F.
    San Martin, Luiz A. B.
    JOURNAL OF DYNAMICAL AND CONTROL SYSTEMS, 2020, 26 (02) : 289 - 310
  • [27] EXTENDED LYAPUNOV EXPONENTS
    WIESEL, WE
    PHYSICAL REVIEW A, 1992, 46 (12): : 7480 - 7491
  • [28] Parametric Lyapunov exponents
    De Thelin, Henry
    Gauthier, Thomas
    Vigny, Gabriel
    BULLETIN OF THE LONDON MATHEMATICAL SOCIETY, 2021, 53 (03) : 660 - 672
  • [29] INTEGRABILITY AND LYAPUNOV EXPONENTS
    Hammerlindl, Andy
    JOURNAL OF MODERN DYNAMICS, 2011, 5 (01) : 107 - 122
  • [30] Flexibility of Lyapunov exponents
    Bochi, J.
    Katok, A.
    Hertz, F. Rodriguez
    ERGODIC THEORY AND DYNAMICAL SYSTEMS, 2022, 42 (02) : 554 - 591