Diaphragmatic and intercostal electromyographic activity during neostigmine, sugammadex and neostigmine-sugammadex-enhanced recovery after neuromuscular blockade A randomised controlled volunteer study

被引:15
|
作者
Cammu, Guy [1 ]
Schepens, Tom [2 ]
De Neve, Nikolaas [1 ]
Wildemeersch, Davina [2 ]
Foubert, Luc [1 ]
Jorens, Philippe G. [3 ]
机构
[1] Onze Lieve Vrouw Hosp, Dept Anaesthesiol & Crit Care Med, Moorselbaan 164, B-9300 Aalst, Belgium
[2] Univ Antwerp, Dept Anaesthesiol, Univ Antwerp Hosp, Antwerp, Belgium
[3] Univ Antwerp, Dept Crit Care Med, Univ Antwerp Hosp, Antwerp, Belgium
关键词
GENIOGLOSSUS MUSCLE-ACTIVITY; REVERSAL; FAILURE;
D O I
10.1097/EJA.0000000000000543
中图分类号
R614 [麻醉学];
学科分类号
100217 ;
摘要
BACKGROUND Electromyographic activity of the diaphragm (EMGdi) during weaning from mechanical ventilation is increased after sugammadex compared with neostigmine. OBJECTIVE To determine the effect of neostigmine on EMGdi and surface EMG (sEMG) of the intercostal muscles during antagonism of rocuronium block with neostigmine, sugammadex and neostigmine followed by sugammadex. DESIGN Randomised, controlled, double-blind study. SETTING Intensive care research unit. PARTICIPANTS Eighteen male volunteers. INTERVENTIONS A transoesophageal EMGdi recorder was inserted into three groups of six anaesthetised study participants, and sEMG was recorded on their intercostal muscles. To reverse rocuronium, volunteers received 50mg kg(-1) neostigmine, 2mg kg(-1) sugammadex or 50mg kg(-1) neostigmine, followed 3 min later by 2mg kg(-1) sugammadex. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES We examined the EMGdi and sEMG at the intercostal muscles during recovery enhanced by neostigmine or sugammadex or neostigmine-sugammadex as primary outcomes. Secondary objectives were the tidal volume, PaO2 recorded between the onset of spontaneous breathing and extubation of the trachea and SpO(2) during and after anaesthesia. RESULTS During weaning, median peak EMGdi was 0.76 (95% confidence interval: 1.20 to 1.80) mV in the neostigmine group, 1.00 (1.23 to 1.82) mV in the sugammadex group and 0.70 (0.91 to 1.21) mV in the neostigminesugammadex group (P<0.0001 with EMGdi increased after sugammadex vs. neostigmine and neostigmine-sugammadex). The median peak intercostal sEMG for the neostigmine group was 0.39 (0.65 to 0.93) mV vs. 0.77 (1.15 to 1.51) mV in the sugammadex group and 0.82 (1.28 to 2.38) mV in the neostigmine-sugammadex group (P<0.0001 with sEMG higher after sugammadex and after neostigmine-sugammadex vs. neostigmine). CONCLUSION EMGdi and sEMG on the intercostal muscles were increased after sugammadex alone compared with neostigmine. Adding sugammadex after neostigmine reduced the EMGdi compared with sugammadex alone. Unlike the diaphragm, intercostal EMG was preserved with neostigmine followed by sugammadex.
引用
收藏
页码:8 / 15
页数:8
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [31] Influence of reversal of neuromuscular blockade with sugammadex or neostigmine on postoperative quality of recovery following a single bolus dose of rocuronium: A prospective, randomized, double-blinded, controlled study
    Kim, Na Young
    Koh, Jae Chul
    Lee, Ki-Young
    Kim, Sung Soo
    Hong, Jung Hwa
    Nam, Hoon Jae
    Bai, Sun-Joon
    JOURNAL OF CLINICAL ANESTHESIA, 2019, 57 : 97 - 102
  • [32] Sugammadex versus neostigmine for reversal of residual neuromuscular blockade after surgery: a retrospective cohort analysis of postoperative side-effects
    Schmidt, Marc
    Li, Kai
    Yang, Dongsheng
    Turan, Alparslan
    Sessler, Daniel I.
    Ruetzler, Kurt
    SWISS MEDICAL WEEKLY, 2021, 151 : 11S - 11S
  • [33] Effect of magnesium sulphate on sugammadex reversal time for neuromuscular blockade: a randomised controlled study
    Germano Filho, P. A.
    Cavalcanti, I. L.
    Barrucand, L.
    Vercosa, N.
    ANAESTHESIA, 2015, 70 (08) : 956 - 961
  • [34] Successful Neuromuscular Blockade Reversal Using Sugammadex and Neostigmine Failed to Prevent Myasthenic Crisis After Emergency Surgery: A Case Report
    Haddad, Daniel
    Hanna, Adeeb J.
    Russo, Lori
    CUREUS JOURNAL OF MEDICAL SCIENCE, 2022, 14 (07)
  • [35] Effects of neuromuscular block reversal with neostigmine/glycopyrrolate versus sugammadex on bowel motility recovery after laparoscopic colorectal surgery: A randomized controlled trial
    Choi, Eun-Su
    Lee, Jiyoun
    Lee, Ji Hyeon
    Kim, Jin-Hee
    Han, Sung-Hee
    Park, Jin-Woo
    JOURNAL OF CLINICAL ANESTHESIA, 2024, 98
  • [36] Comparison of Effects of Sugammadex and Neostigmine on Postoperative Neuromuscular Blockade Recovery in Patients with Interstitial Lung Diseases Undergoing Transbronchial Cryobiopsy: A Randomized Trial
    Lu, Liya
    Chen, Xiaobo
    Li, Shiyue
    Cen, Yanyi
    MEDICAL SCIENCE MONITOR, 2024, 30
  • [37] Postoperative Risk of Transfusion After Reversal of Residual Neuromuscular Block With Sugammadex Versus Neostigmine: A Retrospective Cohort Study
    Schmidt, Marc T.
    Paredes, Stephania
    Rossler, Julian
    Mukhia, Rupashi
    Pu, Xuan
    Mao, Guangmei
    Turan, Alparslan
    Ruetzler, Kurt
    ANESTHESIA AND ANALGESIA, 2023, 136 (04): : 745 - 752
  • [38] Comparison of recovery after sugammadex or neostigmine reversal of rocuronium in geriatric patients undergoing spine surgery: a randomized controlled trial
    Mraovic, Boris
    Timko, Noah J.
    Choma, Theodore J.
    CROATIAN MEDICAL JOURNAL, 2021, 62 (06) : 606 - 613
  • [39] Sugammadex versus neostigmine for neuromuscular blockade reversal in outpatient surgeries: A randomized controlled trial to evaluate efficacy and associated healthcare cost in an academic center
    Diaz, Juan Fiorda
    Echeverria-Villalobos, Marco
    Gutierrez, Alan Esparza
    Dada, Olufunke
    Stoicea, Nicoleta
    Ackermann, Wiebke
    Abdel-Rasoul, Mahmoud
    Heard, Jarrett
    Uribe, Alberto
    Bergese, Sergio D. D.
    FRONTIERS IN MEDICINE, 2022, 9
  • [40] The Duration of Residual Neuromuscular Block After Administration of Neostigmine or Sugammadex at Two Visible Twitches During Train-of-Four Monitoring
    Illman, Hanna L.
    Laurila, Paivi
    Antila, Heikki
    Meretoja, Olli A.
    Alahuhta, Seppo
    Olkkola, Klaus T.
    ANESTHESIA AND ANALGESIA, 2011, 112 (01): : 63 - 68