A comparison of two methods for fitting the INDCLUS model

被引:5
|
作者
Ten Berge, JMF [1 ]
Kiers, HAL [1 ]
机构
[1] Univ Groningen, Heijmans Inst Psychol Res, NL-9712 TS Groningen, Netherlands
关键词
binary clustering; binary least squares fitting; proximity matrices;
D O I
10.1007/s00357-005-0017-4
中图分类号
O1 [数学];
学科分类号
0701 ; 070101 ;
摘要
Chaturvedi and Carroll have proposed the SINDCLUS method for fitting the INDCLUS model. It is based on splitting the two appearances of the cluster matrix in the least squares fit function and relying on convergence to a solution where both cluster matrices coincide. Kiers has proposed an alternative method which preserves equality of the cluster matrices throughout. This paper shows that the latter method is generally to be preferred. However, because the method has a serious local minimum problem, alternative approaches should be contemplated.
引用
收藏
页码:273 / 285
页数:13
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [21] A COMPARISON OF 3 METHODS OF FITTING THE NORMAL OGIVE
    CRAMER, EM
    PSYCHOMETRIKA, 1962, 27 (02) : 183 - 192
  • [22] A comparison of methods of fitting models to twin data
    Huggins, RM
    Loesch, DZ
    Hoang, NH
    AUSTRALIAN & NEW ZEALAND JOURNAL OF STATISTICS, 1998, 40 (02) : 129 - 140
  • [23] Methods for anaerobic digestion model fitting-comparison between heuristic and automatic approach
    Postawa, Karol
    Szczygiel, Jerzy
    Kulazynski, Marek
    BIOMASS CONVERSION AND BIOREFINERY, 2022, 12 (09) : 4049 - 4059
  • [24] Comparison of two fitting methods for ring diagram analysis of very high l solar oscillations
    Patron, J
    Hernandez, IG
    Chou, DY
    Sun, MT
    Mu, TM
    Loudagh, S
    Bala, B
    Chou, YP
    Lin, CH
    Huang, IJ
    Jimenez, A
    RabelloSoares, MC
    Ai, G
    Wang, GP
    Zirin, H
    Marquette, W
    Nenow, J
    Ehgamberdiev, S
    Khalikov, S
    ASTROPHYSICAL JOURNAL, 1997, 485 (02): : 869 - 874
  • [25] Comparison of two model-based Bayesian fitting methods for pharmaco-kinetic adaptive control of gentamicin dosage regimens in geriatrics
    Goutelle, S.
    Mauguen, B.
    Maire, P.
    Bourguignon, L.
    FUNDAMENTAL & CLINICAL PHARMACOLOGY, 2010, 24 : 61 - 61
  • [26] A comparison of algorithms for fitting the PARAFAC model
    Tomasi, G
    Bro, R
    COMPUTATIONAL STATISTICS & DATA ANALYSIS, 2006, 50 (07) : 1700 - 1734
  • [27] Optimization methods for tensor decomposition: A comparison of new algorithms for fitting the CP(CANDECOMP/PARAFAC) model
    Yu, Huiwen
    Larsen, Kasper Green
    Christiansen, Ove
    CHEMOMETRICS AND INTELLIGENT LABORATORY SYSTEMS, 2025, 257
  • [28] A comparison of statistical methods for fitting telescope pointing models
    Meeks, RL
    MODELING AND SYSTEMS ENGINEERING FOR ASTRONOMY, 2004, 5497 : 486 - 496
  • [29] Methods for fitting CSG models to point clouds and their comparison
    Rabbani, T
    van den Heuvel, F
    PROCEEDINGS OF THE SEVENTH IASTED INTERNATIONAL CONFERENCE ON COMPUTER GRAPHICS AND IMAGING, 2004, : 279 - 284
  • [30] Comparison between three Cluster Expansion fitting methods
    Herder, Laura
    ABSTRACTS OF PAPERS OF THE AMERICAN CHEMICAL SOCIETY, 2013, 246