What can we learn from long-term studies on chronic low back pain? A scoping review

被引:2
|
作者
Dutmer, Alisa L. [1 ]
Soer, Remko [1 ,2 ,3 ]
Wolff, Andre P. [3 ,4 ]
Reneman, Michiel F. [1 ]
Coppes, Maarten H. [5 ]
Schiphorst Preuper, Henrica R. [1 ,3 ]
机构
[1] Univ Groningen, Univ Med Ctr Groningen, Dept Rehabil, Groningen, Netherlands
[2] Saxion Univ Appl Sci, Expertise Ctr Hlth & Movement, Enschede, Netherlands
[3] Univ Groningen, Univ Med Ctr Groningen, Pain Ctr, Groningen, Netherlands
[4] Univ Groningen, Univ Med Ctr Groningen, Dept Anesthesiol, Groningen, Netherlands
[5] Univ Groningen, Univ Med Ctr Groningen, Dept Neurosurg, Groningen, Netherlands
关键词
Scoping review; Chronic low back pain; Long-term follow-up; Disability; Quality of life; Work participation; TOTAL DISC REPLACEMENT; LUMBAR INTERBODY FUSION; 5-YEAR FOLLOW-UP; PRIMARY-CARE; SPINAL-FUSION; MULTIDISCIPLINARY REHABILITATION; COGNITIVE INTERVENTION; CLINICAL-OUTCOMES; CONTROLLED-TRIAL; ARTIFICIAL DISC;
D O I
10.1007/s00586-022-07111-3
中图分类号
R74 [神经病学与精神病学];
学科分类号
摘要
Purpose A scoping review was conducted with the objective to identify and map the available evidence from long-term studies on chronic non-specific low back pain (LBP), to examine how these studies are conducted, and to address potential knowledge gaps. Method We searched MEDLINE and EMBASE up to march 2021, not restricted by date or language. Experimental and observational study types were included. Inclusion criteria were: participants between 18 and 65 years old with non-specific sub-acute or chronic LBP, minimum average follow-up of > 2 years, and studies had to report at least one of the following outcome measures: disability, quality of life, work participation, or health care utilization. Methodological quality was assessed using the Effective Public Health Practice Project quality assessment. Data were extracted, tabulated, and reported thematically. Results Ninety studies met the inclusion criteria. Studies examined invasive treatments (72%), conservative (21%), or a comparison of both (7%). No natural cohorts were included. Methodological quality was weak (16% of studies), moderate (63%), or strong (21%) and generally improved after 2010. Disability (92%) and pain (86%) outcomes were most commonly reported, followed by work (25%), quality of life (15%), and health care utilization (4%). Most studies reported significant improvement at long-term follow-up (median 51 months, range 26 months-18 years). Only 10 (11%) studies took more than one measurement > 2 year after baseline. Conclusion Patients with persistent non-specific LBP seem to experience improvement in pain, disability and quality of life years after seeking treatment. However, it remains unclear what factors might have influenced these improvements, and whether they are treatment-related. Studies varied greatly in design, patient population, and methods of data collection. There is still little insight into the long-term natural course of LBP. Additionally, few studies perform repeated measurements during long-term follow-up or report on patient-centered outcomes other than pain or disability.
引用
收藏
页码:901 / 916
页数:16
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [1] What can we learn from long-term studies on chronic low back pain? A scoping review
    Alisa L. Dutmer
    Remko Soer
    André P. Wolff
    Michiel F. Reneman
    Maarten H. Coppes
    Henrica R. Schiphorst Preuper
    [J]. European Spine Journal, 2022, 31 : 901 - 916
  • [2] Long-term exercisers: What can we learn from them?
    Stone, WJ
    Klein, DA
    [J]. ACSMS HEALTH & FITNESS JOURNAL, 2004, 8 (02) : 11 - 14
  • [3] Low back pain: what is the long-term course? A review of studies of general patient populations
    Lise Hestbaek
    Charlotte Leboeuf-Yde
    Claus Manniche
    [J]. European Spine Journal, 2003, 12 : 149 - 165
  • [4] Low back pain: what is the long-term course? A review of studies of general patient populations
    Hestbaek, L
    Leboeuf-Yde, C
    Manniche, C
    [J]. EUROPEAN SPINE JOURNAL, 2003, 12 (02) : 149 - 165
  • [5] What Can We Learn from the Long-Term Users of a Social Robot?
    Kertesz, Csaba
    Turunen, Markku
    [J]. SOCIAL ROBOTICS, ICSR 2017, 2017, 10652 : 657 - 665
  • [6] Walking with chronic non-specific low back pain - A failed strategy: What can we learn from sports?
    Ertelt, Thomas
    [J]. MEDICAL HYPOTHESES, 2014, 82 (05) : 601 - 605
  • [7] Financing long-term care: What we can learn from the German experience
    von der Schulenburg, JMG
    [J]. LONG-TERM CARE FOR FRAIL OLDER PEOPLE: REACHING FOR THE IDEAL SYSTEM, 1999, 4 : 149 - 152
  • [8] Comparison of the efficacy and tolerability of new antiepileptic drugs: what can we learn from long-term studies?
    Zaccara, G.
    Messori, A.
    Cincotta, M.
    Burchini, G.
    [J]. ACTA NEUROLOGICA SCANDINAVICA, 2006, 114 (03): : 157 - 168
  • [9] What can we learn from long-term groundwater data to improve climate change impact studies?
    Stoll, S.
    Franssen, H. J. Hendricks
    Barthel, R.
    Kinzelbach, W.
    [J]. HYDROLOGY AND EARTH SYSTEM SCIENCES, 2011, 15 (12) : 3861 - 3875
  • [10] What can we learn from twin studies of pain and analgesia?
    Nielsen, Christopher Sivert
    [J]. PAIN, 2012, 153 (07) : 1346 - 1347