Effectiveness and Safety of Insulin Glargine 300 U/ml in Comparison with Insulin Degludec 100 U/ml Evaluated with Continuous Glucose Monitoring in Adults with Type 1 Diabetes and Suboptimal Glycemic Control in Routine Clinical Practice: The OneCARE Study

被引:13
|
作者
Conget, Ignacio [1 ]
Angel Mangas, Miguel [2 ]
Morales, Cristobal [3 ,4 ]
Caro, Juan [5 ]
Gimenez, Margarita [1 ]
Borrell, Mireia [6 ]
Delgado, Elias [7 ,8 ,9 ,10 ]
机构
[1] Hosp Clin Barcelona, C Villarroel 170, Barcelona 08036, Spain
[2] Hosp Univ Virgen Rocio, Ave Manuel Siurot S-N, Seville 41013, Spain
[3] Hosp Univ Virgen Macarena, Calle Dr Fedriani 3, Seville 41009, Spain
[4] Hosp Vithas Sevilla, Avda Placido Fernandez Viagas S-N, Seville 41950, Spain
[5] Clin MediNorte, Av Marques Sotelo 13,1 2, Valencia 46002, Spain
[6] C Josep Pla 2, Barcelona 08019, Spain
[7] Univ Oviedo, Oviedo, Spain
[8] Hosp Univ Cent Asturias, Ave Roma S-N, Oviedo 33011, Spain
[9] Inst Invest Biomed Principado Asturias, Oviedo, Spain
[10] CIBERER, Oviedo, Spain
关键词
CGM; Gla-300; Glycemic control; T1D; LESS HYPOGLYCEMIA; PEOPLE; VARIABILITY; UNITS/ML; TRIAL; MULTICENTER; PROTRACTION; INJECTIONS; AWARENESS; PROFILES;
D O I
10.1007/s13300-021-01153-4
中图分类号
R5 [内科学];
学科分类号
1002 ; 100201 ;
摘要
Introduction Data regarding efficacy of second-generation basal insulins (BI) using continuous glucose monitoring (CGM) come from clinical trials. We evaluated the effectiveness of insulin glargine 300 U/ml (Gla-300) compared to insulin degludec 100 U/ml (IDeg-100) in terms of percentage of time in range (TIR); 70-180 mg/dl was obtained from CGM in sub-optimally controlled patients with type 1 diabetes (T1D) in routine clinical practice. Methods This observational, multicenter, cross-sectional study included patients with T1D (> 3 years diabetes duration, HbA(1c) >= 7.5%) who had switched from first-generation BI to Gla-300/IDeg-100 within the past 24 months according to physician discretion. Clinical and laboratory data were obtained from clinical records and during study visit, and CGM data were collected prior to the visit. Results One hundred ninety-nine people with T1D were included [42.6 +/- 13.4 (mean +/- SD) years, 18.4 +/- 10.4 years diabetes duration]; 104 received Gla-300, 95 IDeg-100. TIR 70-180 throughout whole day was similar in both groups, 52.4 +/- 14.0 vs. 49.3 +/- 13.9% Gla-300/IDeg-100, respectively. At night, TIR 70-180 and TIR 70-140 were significantly higher in the Gla-300 group compared to the IDeg-100 (52.4 vs. 46.2 and 31.8 vs. 26.9%, respectively, p = 0.0209 and p = 0.0182), and time above range (180) was significantly lower in the Gla-300 group (40.1% vs. 47.2%, p = 0.0199). Additional CGM glucometric data were comparable in both groups. Patient treatment satisfaction score assessed through the Diabetes Treatment Satisfaction Questionnaire (DTSQ) was high and similar for both insulins. Conclusion This real-world study shows the effectiveness and safety of Gla-300 are more similar to than different from IDeg-100, with a slightly better nocturnal glucose profile, in sub-optimally controlled T1D patients switching from a first-generation BI.
引用
收藏
页码:2993 / 3009
页数:17
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [31] Clinical relevance of pharmacokinetic and pharmacodynamic profiles of insulin degludec (100, 200 U/mL) and insulin glargine (100, 300 U/mL) - a review of evidence and clinical interpretation
    Owens, D. R.
    Bailey, T. S.
    Fanelli, C. G.
    Yale, J. -F.
    Bolli, G. B.
    DIABETES & METABOLISM, 2019, 45 (04) : 330 - 340
  • [32] Comparison of insulin glargine 300 U/mL and insulin degludec using flash glucose monitoring: A randomized cross-over study
    Yamabe, Mizuho
    Kuroda, Mami
    Hirosawa, Yasuyo
    Kamino, Hiromi
    Ohno, Haruya
    Yoneda, Masayasu
    JOURNAL OF DIABETES INVESTIGATION, 2019, 10 (02) : 352 - 357
  • [33] Comment on "a comparative effectiveness study of degludec and insulin glargine 300 U/mL in insulin-naive patients with type 2 diabetes"
    Freemantle, Nick
    Jourdan, Sophie
    DIABETES OBESITY & METABOLISM, 2019, 21 (07): : 1758 - 1759
  • [34] Cost-effectiveness analysis of once-daily insulin glargine 300 U/mL versus insulin degludec 100 U/mL using the BRAVO diabetes model
    Shao, Hui
    Shi, Lizheng
    Fonseca, Vivian
    Alsaleh, Abdul Jabbar Omar
    Gill, Jasvinder
    Nicholls, Charlie
    DIABETIC MEDICINE, 2023, 40 (09)
  • [35] Outcomes of glycemic control in type 1 diabetic patients switched from basal insulin glargine 100 U/ml to glargine 300 U/ml in real life
    Oriot, Philippe
    Jeremie, Wawrzyniak
    Buysschaert, Martin
    EXPERT REVIEW OF ENDOCRINOLOGY & METABOLISM, 2018, 13 (03) : 167 - 171
  • [36] Glycaemic variability and risk for hypoglycaemia on insulin glargine 300 U/ml versus insulin glargine 100 U/ml in people with type 2 diabetes
    Kovatchev, B.
    Meng, Z.
    Breton, M.
    Leroy, B.
    Cali, A.
    Perfetti, R.
    DIABETOLOGIA, 2017, 60 : S36 - S37
  • [37] BUDGET IMPACT MODEL FOR INSULIN GLARGINE-300U/ ML (GLA-300) VS INSULIN DEGLUDEC 100 U/ML IN THE TREATMENT OF TYPE 1 DIABETES MELLITUS BASED ON THE INRANGE STUDY
    Safia, M.
    Hachelaf, Z.
    Aissaoui, A.
    Mahieu, A.
    Jabbar, O. A. Abdul
    VALUE IN HEALTH, 2024, 27 (12)
  • [38] CONFIRM: a comparative effectiveness study of insulin degludec and insulin glargine 300 units/ ml (glargine U300) in insulin-naive patients with type 2 diabetes
    Tibaldi, J.
    Haldrup, S.
    Sandberg, V.
    Wolden, M. L.
    Rodbard, H. W.
    DIABETOLOGIA, 2018, 61 : S44 - S44
  • [39] Continuous Glucose Monitoring During Basal–Bolus Therapy Using Insulin Glargine 300 U mL−1 and Glargine 100 U mL−1 in Japanese People with Type 1 Diabetes Mellitus: A Crossover Pilot Study
    Hideaki Jinnouchi
    Masayoshi Koyama
    Atsushi Amano
    Yoshinori Takahashi
    Akira Yoshida
    Kunio Hieshima
    Seigo Sugiyama
    Noboru Kurinami
    Tomio Jinnouchi
    Reinhard Becker
    Diabetes Therapy, 2015, 6 : 143 - 152
  • [40] Insulin Glargine 300 U/mL and Insulin Glulisine Treatment in Patients with Type 2 Diabetes: A Non-Interventional Study of Effectiveness in Routine Clinical Practice
    Hidvegi, Tibor
    Balogh, Zoltan
    Vass, Viktor
    Kovacs, Gabor
    Stella, Peter
    DIABETES THERAPY, 2020, 11 (02) : 467 - 478