Online training in evidence-based medicine and research methods for GP registrars: a mixed-methods evaluation of engagement and impact

被引:8
|
作者
Rahimi-Ardabili, Hania [1 ]
Spooner, Catherine [1 ]
Harris, Mark F. [1 ]
Magin, Parker [2 ,3 ]
Tam, Chun Wah Michael [4 ]
Liaw, Siaw-Teng [5 ]
Zwar, Nicholas [6 ]
机构
[1] UNSW Sydney, Ctr Primary Hlth Care & Equ, Sydney, NSW 2052, Australia
[2] GP Synergy, Res & Evaluat Unit, Sydney, NSW 2304, Australia
[3] Univ Newcastle, Sch Med & Publ Hlth, Callaghan, NSW 2304, Australia
[4] South Western Sydney Local Hlth Dist, Primary & Integrated Care Unit, Liverpool, NSW 2170, Australia
[5] UNSW Sydney, Sch Populat Hlth, WHO Collaborating Ctr eHlth, Sydney, NSW 2052, Australia
[6] Bond Univ, Fac Hlth Sci & Med, Gold Coast 4229, Australia
关键词
Evidence-based medicine; Online education; GP; Clinical practice; Mixed methods; RESPIRATORY-TRACT INFECTIONS; GENERAL-PRACTICE; TRAINEES; BARRIERS;
D O I
10.1186/s12909-021-02916-0
中图分类号
G40 [教育学];
学科分类号
040101 ; 120403 ;
摘要
Background Evidence-based medicine (EBM) is a core skillset for enhancing the quality and safety of patients' care. Online EBM education could improve clinicians' skills in EBM, particularly when it is conducted during vocational training. There are limited studies on the impact of online EBM training on clinical practice among general practitioner (GP) registrars (trainees in specialist general practice). We aimed to describe and evaluate the acceptability, utility, satisfaction and applicability of the GP registrars experience with the online course. The course was developed by content-matter experts with educational designers to encompass effective teaching methods (e.g. it was interactive and used multiple teaching methods). Methods Mixed-method data collection was conducted after individual registrars' completion of the course. The course comprised six modules that aimed to increase knowledge of research methods and application of EBM skills to everyday practice. GP registrars who completed the online course during 2016-2020 were invited to complete an online survey about their experience and satisfaction with the course. Those who completed the course within the six months prior to data collection were invited to participate in semi-structured phone interviews about their experience with the course and the impact of the course on clinical practice. A thematic analysis approach was used to analyse the data from qualitative interviews. Results The data showed the registrars were generally positive towards the course and the concept of EBM. They stated that the course improved their confidence, knowledge, and skills and consequently impacted their practice. The students perceived the course increased their understanding of EBM with a Cohen's d of 1.6. Registrars identified factors that influenced the impact of the course. Of those, some were GP-related including their perception of EBM, and being comfortable with what they already learnt; some were work-place related such as time, the influence of supervisors, access to resources; and one was related to patient preferences. Conclusions This study showed that GP registrars who attended the online course reported that it improved their knowledge, confidence, skill and practice of EBM over the period of three months. The study highlights the supervisor's role on GP registrars' ability in translating the EBM skills learnt in to practice and suggests exploring the effect of EBM training for supervisors.
引用
收藏
页数:14
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [21] Mixed-methods evaluation of a novel online STI results service
    Gibbs, Jo
    Aicken, Catherine R. H.
    Sutcliffe, Lorna J.
    Gkatzidou, Voula
    Tickle, Laura J.
    Hone, Kate
    Sadiq, S. Tariq
    Sonnenberg, Pam
    Estcourt, Claudia S.
    SEXUALLY TRANSMITTED INFECTIONS, 2018, 94 (08) : 622 - 624
  • [22] HIV cure research community engagement in North Carolina: a mixed-methods evaluation of a crowdsourcing contest
    Mathews, Allison
    Farley, Samantha
    Blumberg, Meredith
    Knight, Kimberley
    Hightow-Weidman, Lisa
    Muessig, Kate
    Rennie, Stuart
    Tucker, Joseph
    JOURNAL OF VIRUS ERADICATION, 2017, 3 (04) : 223 - 228
  • [23] The knowledge base for evidence-based nursing - A role for mixed methods research?
    Flemming, Kate
    ADVANCES IN NURSING SCIENCE, 2007, 30 (01) : 41 - 51
  • [24] Methods Braiding: A Technique for Arts-Based and Mixed-Methods Research
    Watson, Ashleigh
    SOCIOLOGICAL RESEARCH ONLINE, 2020, 25 (01): : 66 - 83
  • [25] A Mixed-Methods Evaluation of Social Work Learning Outcomes in Interprofessional Training with Medicine and Pharmacy Students
    Wharton, Tracy
    Burg, Mary Ann
    JOURNAL OF SOCIAL WORK EDUCATION, 2017, 53 : S87 - S96
  • [26] Oncology mental health providers' adaptation of an evidence-based intervention: A mixed-methods study
    Conley, Claire C.
    Ryba, Marlena M.
    Brothers, Brittany M.
    Lo, Stephen B.
    Andersen, Barbara L.
    PSYCHO-ONCOLOGY, 2024, 33 (01)
  • [27] A Mixed-Methods Approach to Investigating the Adoption of Evidence-Based Pain Practices in Nursing Homes
    Ersek, Mary
    Jablonski, Anita
    JOURNAL OF GERONTOLOGICAL NURSING, 2014, 40 (07): : 52 - 60
  • [28] Physiotherapists’ opinions, barriers, and enablers to providing evidence-based care: a mixed-methods study
    Connor Gleadhill
    Katarzyna Bolsewicz
    Simon R. E. Davidson
    Steven J. Kamper
    Amanda Tutty
    Emma Robson
    Priscilla Viana Da Silva
    Bruce Donald
    Katherine Dooley
    Joshua Manvell
    Nicole Manvell
    Andrew Delbridge
    Christopher M. Williams
    BMC Health Services Research, 22
  • [29] A Mixed-Methods Study of Training in Evidence-Based Practice in Psychology Among Students, Faculty, and Practitioners in India and the United States
    Luebbe, Aaron M.
    Gopal, Baiju
    Aggarwal, Pankhuri
    Hay, M. Cameron
    Moosath, Harishankar
    Kumar, Aneesh
    Painadath, Viju
    Reddy, K. Jayasankara
    Rangaswamy, Madhavi
    Raval, Vaishali V.
    PROFESSIONAL PSYCHOLOGY-RESEARCH AND PRACTICE, 2024, 55 (04) : 363 - 374
  • [30] Physiotherapists' opinions, barriers, and enablers to providing evidence-based care: a mixed-methods study
    Gleadhill, Connor
    Bolsewicz, Katarzyna
    Davidson, Simon R. E.
    Kamper, Steven J.
    Tutty, Amanda
    Robson, Emma
    Da Silva, Priscilla Viana
    Donald, Bruce
    Dooley, Katherine
    Manvell, Joshua
    Manvell, Nicole
    Delbridge, Andrew
    Williams, Christopher M.
    BMC HEALTH SERVICES RESEARCH, 2022, 22 (01)